Page 86 - IJB-7-2
P. 86

A Scientometric Analysis
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17198-0          In Vitro Stabilized Skin Model and In Vivo Pre-vascularized
           45.  Tomasina C, Bodet  T, Mota C,  et al., 2019, Bioprinting   Skin  Patch  Using  Tissue-specific  Extracellular  Matrix
               Vasculature:  Materials, Cells and Emergent  Techniques.   Bioink: A Step towards Advanced Skin Tissue Engineering.
               Materials (Basel), 12:2701.                         Biomaterials, 168:38–53.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172701                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.040
           46.  Miri  AK, Khalilpour  A, Cecen B,  et al., 2019, Multiscale   57.  Skardal A, Murphy SV, Crowell K, et al., 2017, A Tunable
               Bioprinting of Vascularized Models. Biomaterials, 198:204–16.  Hydrogel System for Long-term Release of Cell-secreted
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.006  Cytokines and Bioprinted  In Situ  Wound Cell Delivery.
           47.  Thomas A, Orellano I, Lam T, et al., 2020, Vascular Bioprinting   J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 105:1986–2000.
               with Enzymatically Degradable Bioinks  Via Multi-material      https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33736
               Projection-based Stereolithography. Acta Biomater, 117:121–32.   58.  Jorgensen AM, Varkey M, Gorkun A, et al., 2020, Bioprinted
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.033.       Skin Recapitulates  Normal Collagen Remodeling  in Full-
           48.  Ouyang L, Armstrong JPK, Chen Q, et al., 2020,Void-Free 3D   Thickness Wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:512–26.
               Bioprinting  for  In Situ  Endothelialization  and  Microfluidic      https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0319
               Perfusion. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1908349.         59.  Chen S, Nakamoto T, Kawazoe N, et al., 2015, Engineering
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201908349              Multi-layered  Skeletal  Muscle  Tissue by Using 3D
           49.  Song  KH,  Highley  CB,  Rouff  A,  et  al., 2018, Complex   Microgrooved Collagen Scaffolds. Biomaterials, 73:23–31.
               3D-Printed  Microchannels  within  Cell-Degradable     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.010
               Hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater, 28:1–10.            60.  Mozetic P, Giannitelli SM, Gori M, et al., 2017, Engineering
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801331              Muscle Cell Alignment  through 3D Bioprinting.  J Biomed
           50.  Hakimi  N, Cheng  R,  Leng  L,  et  al.,  2018,  Handheld  Skin   Mater Res Part A, 105:2582–8.
               Printer: In Situ Formation of Planar Biomaterials and Tissues.      https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36117
               Lab Chip, 18:1440–51.                           61.  Kim JH, Kim I, Seol YJ, et al., 2020, Neural Cell Integration
               https://doi.org/10.1039/C7LC01236E                  into 3D Bioprinted Skeletal Muscle Constructs Accelerates
           51.  Shamloo A, Aghababaie Z, Afjoul H, et al., 2021, Fabrication   Restoration of Muscle Function. Nat Commun, 11:1–12.
               and  Evaluation  of  Chitosan/Gelatin/PVA  Hydrogel     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14930-9
               Incorporating  Honey for  Wound Healing Applications: An   62.  Baltazar  T, Merola J, Catarino C,  et al.,  2020, Three
               In Vitro, In Vivo Study. Int J Pharm, 592:120068.   Dimensional Bioprinting of a  Vascularized and Perfusable
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120068       Skin Graft Using Human Keratinocytes, Fibroblasts, Pericytes,
           52.  Yeo  M,  Kim  G,  2018,  Three-Dimensional  Microfibrous   and Endothelial Cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 26:227–38.
               Bundle Structure Fabricated Using an Electric Field-Assisted/  63.  Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-concept:
               Cell Printing Process for Muscle Tissue Regeneration. ACS   3D Bioprinting  of Pigmented  Human Skin Constructs.
               Biomater Sci Eng, 4:728–38.                         Biofabrication, 10:25005.
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00983     https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9e1e
           53.  Merceron TK, Burt M, Seol YJ, et al., 2015, A 3D Bioprinted   64.  Kageyama  T, Yan  L, Shimizu A,  et  al., 2019, Preparation
               Complex Structure for Engineering the Muscle-tendon Unit.   of Hair  Beads  and  Hair  Follicle  Germs  for Regenerative
               Biofabrication, 7:35003.                            Medicine. Biomaterials, 212:55–63.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035003        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.003
           54.  Venus M, Waterman J, McNab I, 2010, Basic Physiology of   65.  Frías-Sánchez  A, Quevedo-Moreno  D, Samandari  M,
               the Skin. Surgery, 28:469–72.                       et al., 2021, Biofabrication of Muscle Fibers Enhanced with
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2010.07.011         Plant  Viral  Nanoparticles  Using Surface  Chaotic  Flows.
           55.  García-Lizarribar  A, Fernández-Garibay  X,  Velasco-  Biofabrication. 2021:abd9d7.
               Mallorquí F, et al., 2018, Composite Biomaterials as Long-     https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/abd9d7
               Lasting  Scaffolds  for  3D  Bioprinting  of  Highly  Aligned   66.  Ceballos-González  CF, Bolívar-Monsalve EJ, Quevedo-
               Muscle Tissue. Macromol Biosci, 18:1800167.         Moreno  DA,  et  al.,  2020, Micro-biogeography  Greatly
               http://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201800167               Matters  for Competition:  Continuous  Chaotic  Bioprinting
           56.  Kim BS, Kwon YW, Kong JS, et al., 2018, 3D Cell Printing of   of Spatially-controlled  Bacterial  Microcosms.  BioRxiv,

           82                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91