Page 91 - IJB-7-2

González, et al.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103129 Resolution Stereolithography-based 3D Bioprinting System
153. de Ruijter M, Ribeiro A, Dokter I, et al., 2019, Simultaneous Using Visible Light Crosslinkable Bioinks. Biofabrication,
Micropatterning of Fibrous Meshes and Bioinks for the 7:45009.
Fabrication of Living Tissue Constructs. Adv Healthc Mater, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
8:e1800418. 164. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, et al., 2015, A Multimaterial
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800418 Bioink Method for 3D Printing Tunable, Cell-Compatible
154. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27:1607–14.
Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications of Gelatin https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73:254–71 165. Shin JH, Kang HW, 2018, The Development of Gelatin-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 Based Bio-Ink for Use in 3D Hybrid Bioprinting. Int J Precis
155. Lee BH, Lum N, Seow LY, et al., 2016, Synthesis and Eng Manuf, 19:767–71.
Characterization of Types A and B Gelatin Methacryloyl for https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0092-1
Bioink Applications. Materials (Basel), 9:4–7. 166. Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al., 2010, Cell-laden
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9100797 Microengineered Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogels.
156. Chen X, Du W, Cai Z, et al., 2020, Uniaxial Stretching of Biomaterials, 31:5536–44.
Cell-Laden Microfibers for Promoting C2C12 Myoblasts https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
Alignment and Myofibers Formation. ACS Appl Mater 167. Peak CW, Stein J, Gold KA, et al., 2018, Nanoengineered
Interfaces, 12:2162–70. Colloidal Inks for 3D Bioprinting. Langmuir, 34:917–25.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22103 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02540
157. Wang Z, Tian Z, Menard F, et al., 2017, Comparative Study 168. Nemir S, Hayenga HN, West JL, 2010, PEGDA Hydrogels with
of Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogels from Different Sources Patterned Elasticity: Novel Tools for the Study of Cell Response
for Biofabrication Applications. Biofabrication, 9:44101. to Substrate Rigidity. Biotechnol Bioeng, 105:636–44.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa83cf https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22574
158. Offengenden M, Chakrabarti S, Wu J, 2018, Chicken Collagen 169. López-Marcial GR, Zeng AY, Osuna C, et al., 2018, Agarose-
Hydrolysates Differentially Mediate Anti-inflammatory Based Hydrogels as Suitable Bioprinting Materials for Tissue
Activity and Type I Collagen Synthesis on Human Dermal Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 4:3610–6.
Fibroblasts. Food Sci Hum Wellness, 7:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.02.002 170. Abelseth E, Abelseth L, De la Vega L, et al., 2019, 3D Printing
159. Lee J, Park CH, Kim CS, 2018, Microcylinder-laden Gelatin- of Neural Tissues Derived from Human Induced Pluripotent
based Bioink Engineered for 3D Bioprinting. Mater Lett, Stem Cells Using a Fibrin-Based Bioink. ACS Biomater Sci
233:24–7. Eng, 5:234–3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.08.138 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01235
160. Ying GL, Jiang N, Maharjan S, et al., 2018, Aqueous Two- 171. Cappelletti RM, 2012, Fibrinogen and Fibrin: Structure and
Phase Emulsion Bioink-Enabled 3D Bioprinting of Porous Functional Aspects. J Thromb Haemost, 3:1894–904.
Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 30:1805460. 172. de Melo BAG, Jodat YA, Cruz EM, et al., 2020, Strategies
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805460 to Use Fibrinogen as Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Fibrin-based
161. Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Low- Soft and Hard Tissues. Acta Biomater, 117:60–76.
Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.024
Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy. ACS Appl 173. Chameettachal S, Midha S, Ghosh S, 2016, Regulation of
Mater Interfaces, 10:6849–57. Chondrogenesis and Hypertrophy in Silk Fibroin-Gelatin-
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16059 Based 3D Bioprinted Constructs. ACS Biomater Sci Eng,
162. Na K, Shin S, Lee H, et al., Effect of Solution Viscosity on 2:1450–63.
Retardation of Cell Sedimentation in DLP 3D Printing of https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00152
Gelatin Methacrylate/Silk Fibroin Bioink. J Ind Eng Chem, 174. Rodriguez MJ, Dixon TA, Cohen E, et al., 2018, 3D Freeform
61:340–7. Printing of Silk Fibroin. Acta Biomater, 71:379–87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.032 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.035
163. Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, et al., 2015, A Simple and High- 175. Chawla S, Midha S, Sharma A, et al., 2018, Silk-Based

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2 87