Page 85 - IJB-7-2

González, et al.
24. Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, et al., 2018, Collagen-alginate as Bioink to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo. Adv Mater,
for Three-Dimensional (3D) Cell Printing Based Cartilage 29:1–7.
Tissue Engineering. Mater Sci Eng C, 83:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701089
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002 34. Kilian D, Ahlfeld T, Akkineni AR, et al., 2020, 3D Bioprinting
25. Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY, et al., 2012, Bioprinting of a of Osteochondral Tissue Substitutes In Vitro-Chondrogenesis
Mechanically Enhanced Three-dimensional Dual Cell-laden in Multi-Layered Mineralized Constructs. Sci Rep, 10:1–17.
Construct for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering Using a https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65050-9
Multi-head Tissue/Organ Building System. J Micromech 35. Zhang H, Huang H, Hao G, et al., 2021, 3D Printing Hydrogel
Microeng, 22:85014. Scaffolds with Nanohydroxyapatite Gradient to Effectively
https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/8/085014 Repair Osteochondral Defects in Rats. Adv Funct Mater,
26. Lee JY, Koo Y, Kim G, 2018, Innovative Cryopreservation 31:1–13.
Process Using a Modified Core/Shell Cell-Printing with a https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202006697
Microfluidic System for Cell-Laden Scaffolds. ACS Appl 36. Ashammakhi N, Hasan A, Kaarela O, et al., 2019, Advancing
Mater Interfaces, 10:9257–68. Frontiers in Bone Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 8:1801048.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18360 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801048
27. Kim YB, Lee H, Kim GH, 2016, Strategy to Achieve Highly 37. Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, et al., 2017, Bioprinted
Porous/Biocompatible Macroscale Cell Blocks, Using Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D
a Collagen/Genipin-bioink and an Optimal 3D Printing Bone Tissue. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1700015.
Process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8:32230–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11669 38. Li L, Yu F, Shi J, et al., 2017, In Situ Repair of Bone and
28. Baldwin P, Li DJ, Auston DA, et al., 2019, Autograft, Cartilage Defects Using 3D Scanning and 3D Printing. Sci
Allograft, and Bone Graft Substitutes: Clinical Evidence and Rep, 7:1–12.
Indications for Use in the Setting of Orthopaedic Trauma https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10060-3
Surgery. J Orthop Trauma, 33:203–13. 39. Cui X, Boland T, 2009, Human Microvasculature Fabrication
https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 Using Thermal Inkjet Printing Technology. Biomaterials,
29. Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Hannon CP, et al., 2019, Cartilage 30:6221–7.
Restoration Surgery: Incidence Rates, Complications, and http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.056
Trends as Reported by the American Board of Orthopaedic 40. Stratesteffen H, Köpf M, Kreimendahl F, et al., 2017, GelMA-
Surgery Part II Candidates. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg, collagen Blends Enable Drop-on-demand 3D Printablility
35:171–8. and Promote Angiogenesis. Biofabrication, 9:45002.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.08.028 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c
30. Cartilage Repair Market Size, Share. Global Industry Report, 41. Jia W, Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Zhang YS, et al., 2016, Direct
2025, n.d. viewed September 16, 2020. Available from: 3D Bioprinting of Perfusable Vascular Constructs Using a
https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ Blend Bioink. Biomaterials, 106:58–68.
cartilage-repair-regeneration-market. [Last accessed on 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.038
Oct 20]. 42. Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A, 2016, Vascularization and
31. Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, et al., 2017, The Bio in the Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static
Ink: Cartilage Regeneration with Bioprintable Hydrogels and Networks. Trends Biotechnol, 34:733–45.
Articular Cartilage-derived Progenitor Cells. Acta Biomater, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002
61:41–53. 43. Auger FA, Gibot L, Lacroix D, 2013, The Pivotal Role of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005 Vascularization in Tissue Engineering. Annu Rev Biomed
32. You F, Eames BF, Chen X, 2017, Application of Extrusion- Eng, 15:177–200.
based Hydrogel Bioprinting for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152428
Int J Mol Sci, 18:8–14. 44. Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, et al., 2017, A Highly
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071597 Printable and Biocompatible Hydrogel Composite for Direct
33. Shi W, Sun M, Hu X et al., 2017, Structurally and Functionally Printing of Soft and Perfusable Vasculature-Like Structures.
Optimized Silk-Fibroin-Gelatin Scaffold Using 3D Printing Sci Rep, 7:1–11.

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 2 81