Page 154 - IJB-7-3
P. 154

A Dual-Sensitive Hydrogel for 3D Printing
           4. Conclusions                                      4.   Bedell ML, Navara  AM, Du  Y,  et al., 2020, Polymeric

           In summary, a thermo-sensitive  and photo-sensitive     Systems for Bioprinting. Chem Rev, 120:10744–92.
           hydrogel based on the triblock copolymers PLGA-PEG-  5.   Li  X, Liu  B, Pei  B,  et  al., 2020, Inkjet  Bioprinting  of
           PLGA was developed for 3D printing. Aqueous solutions   Biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120:10793–833.
           of the copolymers exhibited  thermo-induced  sol-gel   6.   Valot L, Martinez J, Mehdi A, et al., 2019, Chemical Insights
           transition accompanied by the increase of the viscosity.   Into Bioinks for 3D Printing. Chem Soc Rev, 48:4049–86.
           The resulted hydrogels showed excellent shear-thinning      https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00718c
           properties  and  fast  elastic  recovery  properties,  which   7.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and
           rendered  the  thermogels  with good extrudability  while
           maintaining  the predesigned  structures. Furthermore,   Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–85.
           the thermogels allowed for UV photopolymerization       https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
           to stabilize the printed scaffolds, with storage modulus   8.   Jin Y, Liu C, Chai W, et al., 2017, Self-Supporting Nanoclay
           dramatically increased. Through a two-step crosslinking   as  Internal  Scaffold  Material  for  Direct  Printing  of  Soft
           strategy, complicated constructs with high shape fidelity   Hydrogel Composite Structures in  Air.  ACS Appl  Mater
           can be printed. Moreover, the self-supporting printed   Interfaces, 9:17456–65.
           scaffolds  could  be  picked  up  by  hand.  The  synthesis      https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b03613
           process of the dual-sensitive hydrogels was simple and
           low-cost, meaning that large-scale production in industrial   9.   Lee A, Hudson AR, Shiwarski DJ, et al., 2019, 3D Bioprinting
           manufacture was possible. The dual-sensitive hydrogels   of Collagen to Rebuild  Components of the Human Heart.
           were expected to be promising bioinks, development of   Science, 365:482–7.
           cell-laden inks and their applications in tissue engineering   10.  Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, et al., 2018, 3D Bioprinting of Low-
           will be explored in future studies.                     Concentration  Cell-Laden  Gelatin Methacrylate  (GelMA)

           Acknowledgments                                         Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy. ACS Appl
                                                                   Mater Interfaces, 10:6849–57.
           This  work  was  financially  supported  by  the  National      https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16059.s001
           Key  Research  and  Development  Program  of  China   11.  Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic
           (2017YFC1103400).
                                                                   Bioprinting  of Heterogeneous  3D  Tissue Constructs  Using
           Conflict of interest                                    Low-Viscosity Bioink. Adv Mater, 28:677–84.

           All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.     https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310
                                                               12.  Singh  YP, Bandyopadhyay  A, Mandal BB, 2019, 3D
           Author contributions                                    Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for

           Y. Z. designed the experiments. Y. Z. and Y. C. performed   Cartilage  Tissue  Engineering.  ACS  Appl Mater Interfaces,
           the experiments and analyzed the results. Y. Z. wrote the   11:33684–96.
           manuscript. L. W. supervised the work and revised the      https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11644
           manuscript.                                         13.  Schacht K, Jungst T, Schweinlin M, et al., 2015, Biofabrication

           References                                              of Cell-Loaded 3D Spider Silk Constructs. Angew Chem Int
                                                                   Ed, 54:2816–20.
           1.   Noor N, Shapira  A, Edri R,  et al., 2019, 3D Printing of      https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409846
               Personalized  Thick and Perfusable Cardiac Patches and   14.  Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al., 2018, Precisely Printable
               Hearts. Adv Sci, 6:1900344.                         and Biocompatible  Silk Fibroin Bioink  for Digital  Light
               https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344              Processing 3D Printing. Nat Commun, 9:1620.
           2.   Kang HW, Lee  SJ, Ko IK,  et  al., 2016, A 3D Bioprinting      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04517-w
               System  to  Produce  Human-scale  Tissue  Constructs  with   15.  Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA, 2015, Direct 3D Printing
               Structural Integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34:312–9.     of Shear-Thinning  Hydrogels into Self-Healing  Hydrogels.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413                    Adv Mater, 27:5075–9.
           3.   Grigoryan  B,  Paulsen  SJ, Corbett  DC,  et  al.,  2019,      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501234
               Multivascular  Networks  and  Functional  Intravascular   16.  Petta  D,  Armiento  A R, Grijpma  D,  et  al., 2018, 3D
               Topologies within Biocompatible Hydrogels.  Science,   Bioprinting of a Hyaluronan Bioink through Enzymatic-and
               364:458–64.                                         Visible Light-Crosslinking. Biofabrication, 10:044104.

           150                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159