Page 56 - IJB-7-3
        P. 56
     3D Bioprinting Photo-crosslinkable Hydrogels for Bone and Cartilage Repair
               and Osteogenesis Both In Vitro and In Vivo. Adv Sci (Weinh),      https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b18496
               5:1700550.                                      70.  Cui  H,  Zhu  W,  Nowicki  M, et al., 2016, Hierarchical
               https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700550              Fabrication  of Engineered  Vascularized  Bone Biphasic
           59.  Wenz  A,  Tjoeng  I,  Schneider  I,  et  al.,  2018,  Improved   Constructs  Via  Dual  3D  Bioprinting:  Integrating  Regional
               Vasculogenesis  and  Bone  Matrix  Formation  through   Bioactive  Factors  into  Architectural  Design.  Adv  Healthc
               Coculture  of Endothelial  Cells and Stem Cells in  Tissue-  Mater, 5:2174–81.
               specific Methacryloyl Gelatin-Based Hydrogels. Biotechnol      https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600505
               Bioeng, 115:2643–53.                            71.  Boere  KW, Visser  J,  Seyednejad  H,  et  al.,  2014,  Covalent
               https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26792                   Attachment  of  a  Three-dimensionally  Printed  Thermoplast
           60.  Doschak MR, Kucharski CM, Wright JE, et al., 2009, Improved   to a Gelatin Hydrogel for Mechanically Enhanced Cartilage
               Bone  Delivery  of  Osteoprotegerin  by  Bisphosphonate   Constructs. Acta Biomater, 10:2602–11.
               Conjugation in a Rat Model of Osteoarthritis. Mol Pharm,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.041
               6:634–40.                                       72.  Dhawan  A,  Kennedy  PM,  Rizk  EB, et al.,  2019,  Three-
               https://doi.org/10.1021/mp8002368                   dimensional Bioprinting for Bone and Cartilage Restoration in
           61.  Park  D,  Park  CW,  Choi  Y, et al.,  2016,  A  Novel  Small-  Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 27:e215–26.
               molecule PPI Inhibitor Targeting Integrin αvβ3-osteopontin      https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00632
               Interface Blocks Bone Resorption In Vitro and Prevents Bone   73.  Duchi S, Onofrillo C, O’Connell CD, et al., 2017, Handheld
               Loss in Mice. Biomaterials, 98:131–42.              Co-axial Bioprinting: Application to In Situ Surgical Cartilage
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.007  Repair. Scientific Reports, 7:1–12.
           62.  Teno N, Masuya K, Ehara T, et al., 2008, Effect of Cathepsin      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05699-x
               K Inhibitors on Bone Resorption. J Med Chem, 51:5459–62.  74.  Galarraga JH, Kwon MY, Burdick JA, 2019, 3D Bioprinting
           63.  Arrighi  I,  Mark  S,  Alvisi  M, et al.,  2009,  Bone  Healing   Via an In Situ Crosslinking Technique towards Engineering
               Induced by Local Delivery of an Engineered  Parathyroid   Cartilage Tissue. Sci Rep, 9:1–12.
               Hormone Prodrug. Biomaterials, 30:1763–71.          https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56117-3
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.023  75.  Lam T, Dehne T, Krüger JP, et al., 2019, Photopolymerizable
           64.  Rodan  GA,  Martin  TJ,  2000,  Therapeutic  Approaches  to   Gelatin  and  Hyaluronic  Acid  for  Stereolithographic 3D
               Bone Diseases. Science, 289:1508–14.                Bioprinting of Tissue-engineered Cartilage. J Biomed Mater
           65.  Zhang Gand Suggs L J J A d d r, 2007, Matrices and scaffolds   Res, 107:2649–57.
               for drug delivery in vascular tissue engineering. Adv Drug      https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34354
               Deliv Rev, 59:360–73.                           76.  Abdollahiyan P, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A, et al., 2020,
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.08.002          Hydrogel-Based  3D Bioprinting  for Bone  and  Cartilage
           66.  Nomi  M, Atala A,  De  Coppi  P, et al., 2002, Principals of   Tissue Engineering. 15:2000095.
               Neovascularization  for  Tissue  Engineering.  Mol  Aspects      https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000095
               Med, 23:463–83.                                 77.  Askari M, Naniz MA, Kouhi M, et al., 2021, Recent Progress
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-2997(02)00008-0       in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting of Hydrogel Biomaterials for
           67.  An Y, Hubbell JA, 2000, Intraarterial Protein Delivery Via   Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review with Focus on
               Intimally-adherent  Bilayer  Hydrogels.  J  Control Release,   Advanced Fabrication Techniques. Biomater Sci, 9:535–73.
               64:205–15.                                          https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00973c
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00143-1   78.  Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn M, et al., 2012, Direct Human
           68.  Kim HD, Lee EA, An YH, et al., 2017, Chondroitin Sulfate-  Cartilage  Repair Using  Three-dimensional  Bioprinting
               based  Biomineralizing  Surface  Hydrogels  for Bone  Tissue   Technology. Tissue Eng Part A, 18:1304–12.
               Engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9:21639–50.     https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0543
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04114          79.  Gao  F,  Xu  Z,  Liang  Q, et  al.,  2019,  Osteochondral
           69.  Xin T,  Mao  J,  Liu  L, et  al., 2020, Programmed  Sustained   Regeneration with 3D-Printed Biodegradable High-strength
               Release  of  Recombinant  Human  Bone  Morphogenetic   Supramolecular  Polymer Reinforced-gelatin  Hydrogel
               Protein-2 and Inorganic ion Composite Hydrogel as Artificial   Scaffolds. Adv Sci., 6:1900867.
               Periosteum. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12:6840–51.     https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900867
           52                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3
     	
