Page 55 - IJB-7-3

Mei, et al.
based Photo-Sensitive Hydrogel and its Biocompatibility and https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01708-5
Biodegradability. Carbohydr Polym, 166:228–35. 49. Zhang K, Feng Q, Xu J, et al., 2017, Self-assembled
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.072 Injectable Nanocomposite Hydrogels Stabilized by
38. Pei M, Mao J, Xu W, et al., 2019, Photocrosslinkable Chitosan Bisphosphonate-magnesium (Mg +) Coordination Regulates
2
Hydrogels and their Biomedical Applications. J Polym Sci, the Differentiation of Encapsulated Stem Cells Via Dual
57:1862–71. Crosslinking. Adv Funct Mater, 27:1701642.
39. Elizalde-Peña E, Flores-Ramirez N, Luna-Barcenas G, et al., https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201701642
2007, Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-g-glycidyl 50. Zuo Y, Liu X, Wei D, et al., 2015, Photo-cross-linkable
Methacrylate with Methyl Methacrylate. Eur Polym J, Methacrylated Gelatin and Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Hydrogel
43:3963–9. for Modularly Engineering Biomimetic Osteon. 7:10386–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.06.004 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01433
40. Lin CC, Raza A, Shih HJ, 2011, PEG Hydrogels Formed 51. Shi D, Xu X, Ye Y, et al., 2016, Photo-cross-linked Scaffold
by Thiol-ene Photo-Click Chemistry and their Effect on the with Kartogenin-encapsulated Nanoparticles for Cartilage
Formation and Recovery of Insulin-Secreting Cell Spheroids. Regeneration. ACS Nano, 10:1292–9.
Biomaterials, 32:9685–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b06663.s001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.083 52. de Windt TS, Vonk LA, Slaper-Cortenbach IC, et al., 2017,
41. Hockaday L, Kang K, Colangelo N, et al., 2012, Rapid Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Stimulate Cartilage
3D Printing of Anatomically Accurate and Mechanically Regeneration and are Safe for Single-stage Cartilage Repair
Heterogeneous Aortic Valve Hydrogel Scaffolds. in Humans Upon Mixture with Recycled Autologous
Biofabricatio, 4:035005. Chondrons. Stem Cells, 35:256–64.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/4/3/035005 https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2475
42. Lim WS, Chen K, Chong TW, et al., 2018, A Bilayer Swellable 53. Levato R, Webb WR, Otto IA, et al., 2017, The Bio in the
Drug-eluting Ureteric Stent: Localized Drug Delivery to Ink: Cartilage Regeneration with Bioprintable Hydrogels and
Treat Urothelial Diseases. Biomaterials, 165:25–38. Articular Cartilage-derived Progenitor Cells. Acta Biomater,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.035 61:41–53.
43. Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A, 2012, The Mechanical https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.005
Properties and Cytotoxicity of Cell-laden Double-network 54. Yan S, Wang T, Feng L, et al., 2014, Injectable In Situ
Hydrogels Based on Photocrosslinkable Gelatin and Gellan Self-cross-linking Hydrogels Based on Poly (L-glutamic
Gum Biomacromolecules. Biomaterials, 33:3143–52. Acid) and Alginate for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.050 Biomacromolecules, 15:4495–508.
44. Kaur M, Srivastava A, 2002, Photopolymerization: A review. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501313t
J Macromol Sci Part C Polym Rev, 42:481–512. 55. Gao G, Schilling AF, Hubbell K, et al., 2015, Improved
45. Yan Q, Dong H, Su J, et al., 2018, A Review of 3D Printing Properties of Bone and Cartilage Tissue from 3D Inkjet-
Technology for Medical Applications. Engineering, 4:729–42. bioprinted Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Simultaneous
46. Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V, et al., 2016, Microfluidic Deposition and Photocrosslinking in PEG-GelMA.
Bioprinting of Heterogeneous 3D Tissue Constructs Using 37:2349–55.
Low-viscosity Bioink. Adv Mater, 28:677–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1921-2
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503310 56. Rao RR, Stegemann JP, 2013, Cell-based Approaches to
47. Wadnap S, Krishnamoorthy S, Zhang Z, et al., 2019, the Engineering of Vascularized Bone Tissue. Cytotherapy,
Biofabrication of 3D Cell-encapsulated Tubular Constructs 15:1309–22.
Using Dynamic Optical Projection Stereolithography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.06.005
J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30:1–10. 57. Peters EB, 2018, Endothelial Progenitor Cells for the
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6239-5 Vascularization of Engineered Tissues. Tissue Eng Part B
48. Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J, et al., 2020, Prediction of Cell Rev, 24:1–24.
Viability in Dynamic Optical Projection Stereolithography- 58. Zhai X, Ruan C, Ma Y, et al., 2018, 3D-bioprinted Osteoblast-
based Bioprinting Using Machine Learning. J Intell Manuf, laden Nanocomposite Hydrogel Constructs with Induced
2020:1–11. Microenvironments Promote Cell Viability, Differentiation,

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3 51