Page 53 - IJB-7-3

Mei, et al.
on-a-chip devices. The microfluidics technique can and Bioinspired Bone Tissue Engineering. Small, 12:4611–32.
manipulate and regulate fluid at a small scale, and it https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201600626
can combine the geometry of channels (controlled by 3. Bai X, Gao M, Syed S, et al., 2018, Bioactive Hydrogels For
3D printing) and cell confinement with fluid flow to Bone Regeneration. Bioact Mater, 3:401–17.
reconstruct a physiological environment , which will 4. Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al., 2016, 3D Bioprinting for
[96]
reconstruct a structure similar to that of a natural bone and
investigate the biological responses of cells in specific Engineering Complex Tissues. Biotechnol Adv, 34:422–34.
microenvironment. Moreover, as a new emerging concept, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
4D bioprinting has attracted significant attention for 5. Allen MR, Burr DB, 2014, Bone Modeling and Remodeling.
constructing a smart and multi-functional bone scaffold. In: Basic and Applied Bone Biology. Amsterdam,
With “time” as a fourth dimension, this bone scaffold will Netherlands: Elsevier. p75-90.
respond and adjust its structure and function to the disease https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-416015-6.00004-6
development process as well as mimic the dynamics of
the native tissues . To achieve 4D bioprinting, both bio- 6. Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, et al., 2017, Bioprinted
[97]
inks and related technologies should be further explored. Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D
Bio-inks should be sensitive to physical, chemical, or Bone Tissue. Adv Healthc Mater, 6:1700015.
biological changes in microenvironment, necessitating https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015
the design of smart or stimuli-responsive materials. 7. Groll J, Boland T, Blunk T, et al., 2016, Biofabrication:
Meanwhile, advanced scanning system, updated model Reappraising the Definition of an Evolving Field.
processing software, and improved printing technologies
(such as lithography, femtosecond et al.) can simplify Biofabrication, 8:013001.
the operation process and optimize printed bone tissues. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001
By investigating bio-inks combined with other advanced 8. Ashammakhi N, Hasan A, Kaarela O, et al., 2019, Advancing
technologies and transitioning to 4D printing, scientists Frontiers in Bone Bioprinting. Adv Healthc Mater, 8:1801048.
could construct scaffolds more similar to natural tissues https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201801048
for bone engineering. 9. Keriquel V, Oliveira H, Rémy M, et al., 2017, In Situ
In conclusion, 3D bioprinting is a rapidly advancing
research field for bone engineering. With the advance of Printing of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, by Laser-assisted
new technologies and biomaterials, we believe that this Bioprinting, for In Vivo Bone Regeneration Applications. Sci
technique may be the key to giving patients with bone or Rep, 7:1–10.
cartilage defects a chance to improve their quality of life. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x
Acknowledgments 10. Yang Y, Zhang Q, Xu T, et al., 2020, Photocrosslinkable
Nanocomposite Ink for Printing Strong, Biodegradable and
This work was supported by the grant from the Guangdong Bioactive Bone Graft. Biomaterials, 263:120378.
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120378
(2020B1515130002).
11. Nguyen QV, Park JH, Lee DS, 2015, Injectable Polymeric
Conflict of interest Hydrogels for the Delivery of Therapeutic Agents: A Review.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Eur Polym J, 72:602–619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.016
Author contributions 12. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015,
X.Z. supervised the entire writing process of the review. Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications of
Q.M., J.R., and H.P.B. wrote the manuscript. Y.L. edited Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials,
the manuscript. All the authors approved the review for 73:254–271.
publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
References 13. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, et al., 2018, 3D
Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs for Regenerative Medicine.
1. Midha S, Dalela M, Sybil D, et al., 2019, Advances in Three- Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:296–332.
dimensional Bioprinting of Bone: Progress and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.004
J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 13:925–45. 14. Li X, Chen S, Li J, et al., 2016, 3D Culture of Chondrocytes
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2847 in Gelatin Hydrogels with Different Stiffness. Polymers
2. Liu Y, Luo D, Wang T, 2016, Hierarchical Structures of Bone (Basel), 8:269.

International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3 49