Page 140 - IJB-7-4
P. 140

3D-Printed  Anti-Tumor Scaffolds
           such  as  hydrogels,  polymer  micelles,  and  stimulus-  on tumor tissues and the toxicity to normal tissues and
           responsive  materials [10-12] .  Three-dimensional  (3D)   organs.
           printing  technology,  known  as  additive  manufacturing
           (AM), has great potential in fabricating the personalized   2. Materials and methods
           scaffolds [13-15] .  Based  on  the  patient’s  computed   2.1. Materials
           tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),
           3D  models  can  be  quickly  and  accurately  established,   PLA (MW: 500 kDa) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
           making it possible to accurately print irregular models [16,17] .   (Darmstadt, Germany), and MTX was purchased from Bio
           Moreover, the drug-loaded scaffolds made by 3D printing   Basic Inc. (Markham, Ontario, Canada). Cell counting kit-
           technology  have  unique  advantages  in  personalization,   8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Dojindo (Japan). LIVE/
           spatial structure, drug components diversity, drug loading   DEAD®  Viability/Cytotoxicity  Kit  (Live/Dead)  was
           accuracy, and drug release sustainability [18-22] .  purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (L-3224). The
               Among  various  3D  printing  technologies,  fused   fetal  bovine  serum  (FBS),  Dulbecco’s  Modified  Eagle
           deposition  modeling  (FDM),  which  was  launched  by   Medium (DMEM), RPMI-1640, penicillin-streptomycin,
           Stratasys in 1992, has become one of the most popular   and  trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic  acid  (EDTA)
           technologies .  The  technical  advantages  of  FDM   were purchased from Grand Island (New York, USA). All
                     [23]
           include the selectivity of a variety of applicable materials,   the reagents were used without further treatment.
           customized high precision, and low cost . As a typical
                                             [18]
           heat dissipation technology for scaffolding, FDM uses a   2.2. Preparation of the PLA and PLA/MTX
           thermoplastic polymer filament, which is heated to the   composite filaments
           melting  point,  and  then  extruded  from  the  nozzle,  and   The mixture of PLA and MTX was melted and extruded
           deposited layer by layer to create a scaffold [20,24-27] . The   using  granulators.  PLA/MTX  and  PLA  filament  were
           thermoplastic materials used in FDM technology include   prepared by the 3D printing consumable extruder (SHSJ,
           polylactic acid (PLA), poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), poly   Songhu Machinery Co., Ltd., Dongguan, China) with a
           (methyl  methacrylate)  (PMMA),  polycarbonate  (PC),   1.75 ± 0.05 mm constant diameter at 220°C and cooled
           and  acrylonitrile  butadiene  styrene  (ABS) [28-35] . Among   by water, and the screw speed was 45 rpm.
           these  thermoplastic  materials,  PLA  has  been  approved
           by the FDA as biomedical material due to its excellent   2.3. Fabrication of PLA/MTX scaffolds
           biocompatibility [36,37] .  Studies  demonstrated  that  3D
           printing is a powerful tool for manufacturing personalized   The  3D  printing  bracket  was  designed  using  Mimics
           scaffolds  with  specific  geometries.  Fouladian  et  al.   software and SolidWorks2015 software. STL files were
           reported that 3D-printed stents loaded with 5-fluorouracil   converted  to  a  format  (gcode)  recognizable  by  3D
           (5-FU)  drug  were  used  to  treat  esophageal  cancer.   printer (ShanRui DK2, Guangzhou, China) using CURA
           Incorporating anti-cancer drugs into endoluminal stents   software. An ink cartridge was added to the 3D printer
           can provide a sustained release of drugs to esophageal   to transport the PLA/MTX composite filaments, and the
           malignant tissues while prolonging the retention of the   filaments were drawn and melted (210°C) and extruded
           stent and relieving dysphagia .                     through a nozzle (0.4 mm) to print layer by layer.
                                   [38]
               The purpose of this research is to prepare porous   2.4. Characterization of PLA/MTX scaffolds
           PLA/MTX  scaffold  with  a  controllable  MTX  release.
           PLA/MTX filaments with different MTX concentrations   The structures and aperture sizes of PLA/MTX scaffold
           (MTX mass fraction: 0.5 wt%, 1.5 wt%, and 2.5 wt%)   were  characterized  using  field  emission  SEM  (SEM,
           were  prepared  by  melt  mixing  and  extruding  method.   Zeiss_Supra55,  Germany).  Energy-dispersive  X-ray
           PLA/MTX scaffolds were printed by FDM using prepared   analysis  (JXA-8230,  JEOL,  Japan)  was  then  used  to
           PLA/MTX filament. The morphology, composition, and   perform  elemental  analysis  of  the  PLA/MTX  scaffold
           structure of printed PLA/MTX scaffold were investigated   surfaces to assess  the distribution of MTX  in the PLA
           by  scanning  electron  microscopy  (SEM)  and  energy-  matrix.
           dispersive  spectrometer  (EDS).  The  biocompatibility   The high-precision digital density meter (ED-1000,
           of  printed  PLA/MTX  scaffolds  and  the  inhibitory   Shanghai  Tuxin  Electronic  Technology  Co.,  Ltd.)  was
           effect on tumor cells were evaluated in vitro by mouse   used  to  measure  the  porosity.  The  porosity  calculation
           embryo osteoblast precursor cells (MC3T3-E1), human   formula is as follows:
           osteosarcoma cells (MG-63), human breast cancer cells
           (MCF-7), human lung cancer cell lines (A549), and mouse    Porosity (%) = (1-(m/ρ)/V) × 100%
           breast cancer cells (4T1). In addition, the subcutaneous
           xenograft model was used to explore the inhibitory effect   Where, V: outer volume, m: mass, and ρ: density.

           136                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 4
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145