Page 20 - IJB-8-2

Electrohydrodynamic Printed Sub-microscale Fibrous Architectures Improved Cell Attachment and Collagen Type I Deposition
Cells. Int J Nanomed, 9:4135–43. Adhesion Mechanosensitivity. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 30:68–73.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S65272 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.06.003
26. Ribeiro Neto WA, Pereira IH, Ayres E, et al., 2012, Influence 34. Paluch EK, Aspalter IM, Sixt M, 2016, Focal Adhesion-
of the Microstructure and Mechanical Strength of Nanofibers Independent Cell Migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,
of Biodegradable Polymers with Hydroxyapatite in Stem 32:469–90.
Cells Growth. Electrospinning, Characterization and Cell https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125341
Viability. Polym Degrad Stab, 97:2037–51. 35. Revach OY, Grosheva I, Geiger B, 2020, Biomechanical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.048 Regulation of Focal Adhesion and Invadopodia Formation.
27. Li B, Chen Y, He J, et al., 2020, Biomimetic Membranes of J Cell Sci, 133:jcs244848.
Methacrylated Gelatin/Nanohydroxyapatite/Poly(l-Lactic https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.244848
Acid) for Enhanced Bone Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci 36. Sheets K, Wunsch S, Ng C, et al., 2013, Shape-Dependent
Eng, 6:6737–47. Cell Migration and Focal Adhesion Organization on
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00972 Suspended and Aligned Nanofiber Scaffolds. Acta Biomater,
28. Lei Q, He J, Li D, 2019, Electrohydrodynamic 3D Printing of 9:7169–77.
Layer-Specifically Oriented, Multiscale Conductive Scaffolds https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.042
for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Nanoscale, 11:15195–205. 37. Fu X, Liu G, Halim A, et al., 2019, Mesenchymal Stem Cell
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr04989d Migration and Tissue Repair. Cells, 8:784.
29. Xia J, Yuan Y, Wu H, et al., 2020, Decoupling the Effects https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8080784
of Nanopore Size and Surface Roughness on the Attachment, 38. Abedin E, Lari R, Shahri NM, et al., 2018, Development of
Spreading and Differentiation of Bone Marrow-Derived Stem a Demineralized and Decellularized Human Epiphyseal Bone
Cells. Biomaterials, 248:120014. Scaffold for Tissue Engineering: A Histological Study. Tissue
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120014 Cell, 55:46–52.
30. Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, et al., 2017, Bone Biomaterials and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2018.09.003
Interactions with Stem Cells. Bone Res, 5:17059. 39. Blair HC, Larrouture QC, Li Y, et al., 2017, Osteoblast
https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2017.59 Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In
31. Tian F, Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, et al., 2008, Vitro. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 23:268–80.
Quantitative Analysis of Cell Adhesion on Aligned Micro- https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0454
and Nanofibers. J Biomed Mater Res A, 84:291–9. 40. Oryan A, Kamali A, Moshiri A, et al., 2017, Role of
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31304 Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regenerative Medicine:
32. Huang B, Aslan E, Jiang Z, et al., 2020, Engineered Dual- What Is the Evidence? Cells Tissues Organs, 204:59–83.
Scale Poly (ε-Caprolactone) Scaffolds using 3D Printing and https://doi.org/10.1159/000469704
Rotational Electrospinning for Bone Tissue Regeneration. 41. Iaquinta MR, Mazzoni E, Bononi I, et al., 2019, Adult Stem
Addit Manuf, 36:101452. Cells for Bone Regeneration and Repair. Front Cell Dev Biol,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101452 7:268.
33. Oakes PW, Gardel ML, 2014, Stressing the Limits of Focal https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00268

Publisher’s note
Whioce Publishing remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.

12 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2