Page 178 - IJB-8-3
P. 178

Composite Scaffolds for Skin Repair

                        A                                          B












                        C




















           Figure 6. Skin tissue repair in deep burn wound models in vivo. (A) Gross photos of wound areas on days 0, 2, 5, 8, 11, and 14 after
           different treatments. Scale bar: 1 cm. (B) Statistics of wound closure rates of Blank, Gel, and 5DE-Gel groups at all-time points (n = 5).
           (C)  Microscopic photos of H&E stained sections of skin samples on day 14. The red arrows marked several newly formed hair follicles in
           the regenerated skin tissue after treated with 5DE-Gel scaffolds. Scale bar: 500 μm. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.

           Although GelMA is well known for its good degradability   Gel  group,  while  the  wound-healing  progress  was
           and  biocompatibility,  there  are  still  endotoxins  inside   postponed  without  positive  intervention  in  the  other
           the material that could initiate inflammatory response .   two groups.
                                                        [52]
           Fortunately,  the  microenvironment  of  enriched  Si  ions   Subsequently,   further   histological   analysis
           established by silica particles might inhibit the expression   was  conducted  through  Masson’s  Trichrome  and
           of  pro-inflammatory-related  genes  including  TNF-α,   immunofluorescence staining for skin samples. As shown
           IL-6,  IL-1β,  and  IL-12b  in  macrophages .  Therefore,   in Figure 7A, the area occupied by collagen fibers (blue)
                                              [53]
           the inflammation of burn wound was prevented in 5DE-  in the dermis tissue of 5DE-Gel group was significantly
           Gel  group  probably  due  to  the  inflammation  reduced   larger than that of Blank and Gel groups. Accordingly,
           effect of silica. In addition, DE microparticles endowed   the  statistics  of  collagen  content  visually  displayed
           the  composite  scaffolds  enhanced  protein  adsorption,   that  the  3D-printed  5DE-Gel  composite  scaffolds  were
           water absorption, and enzymatic degradation , leading   of great benefit to collagen deposition (Figure 7C). In
                                                 [20]
           to satisfactory wound healing.                      addition, CD31, a specific protein involved in modulating
               H&E staining was performed on the skin samples for   angiogenesis , was stained to assess vascularization in
                                                                         [56]
           subsequent histological analysis. Obviously, continuous   the newly formed skin tissue (Figure 7B). The enhanced
           dermal tissue, accomplished epithelialization, and hair   expression  of  CD31  protein  in  the  immunofluorescent
           follicles morphogenesis (red arrows) could be revealed   staining  images  of  the  5DE-Gel  group  marked  denser
           in the regenerated skin of 5DE-Gel group (Figure 6C).   blood vessel formation in dermis, which was consistent
           In contrast, the burn wounds in Blank and Gel groups   with the statistical results of the number of blood vessels
           were covered by scars without intact structure of dermis   (Figure  7D).  Based  on  above,  the  availability  of  DE
           and  epidermis.  The  previous  studies  have  presented   microparticles  in  promoting  collagen  formation  and
           that  the  re-epithelialization  strongly  associated  to  the   angiogenesis was proved.
           formation  of  granulation  tissue [54,55] .  Therefore,  rapid   For  the  treatment  of  burn  wounds,  the  high
           filling of granulation tissue in the wound sites probably   repair efficiency of the 3D-printed 5DE-Gel scaffolds
           contributed  to  timely  tissue  regeneration  in  the  5DE-  was revealed. On the one hand, the bioactive Si ions

           170                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183