Page 36 - IJB-8-3

Hydrogel based 3D-printing Bioinks for Cartilage Repair
59. Adamiak K, Sionkowska A, 2020, Current Methods of 69. Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB, 2019, 3D
Collagen Cross-linking: Review. Int J Biol Macromol, Bioprinting Using Cross-Linker-Free Silk-Gelatin Bioink for
161:550–60. Cartilage Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.075 11:33684–96.
60. Lee H, Yang GH, Kim M, et al., 2018, Fabrication of Micro/ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11644
Nanoporous Collagen/dECM/Silk-fibroin Biocomposite 70. Vepari C, Kaplan DL, 2007, Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog
Scaffolds Using a Low Temperature 3D Printing Process for Polym Sci, 32:991–1007.
Bone Tissue Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013
84:140–7. 71. Shi W, Sun M, Hu X, et al., 2017, Structurally and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.013 Functionally Optimized Silk-Fibroin-Gelatin Scaffold Using
61. Shim JH, Jang KM, Hahn SK, et al., 2016, Three-dimensional 3D Printing to Repair Cartilage Injury In Vitro and In Vivo.
Bioprinting of Multilayered Constructs Containing Human Adv Mater, 29:1701089.
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Osteochondral Tissue https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701089
Regeneration in the Rabbit Knee Joint. Biofabrication, 72. Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM, et al., 2018, Precisely Printable
8:014102. and Biocompatible Silk Fibroin Bioink for Digital Light
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014102 Processing 3D Printing. Nat Commun, 9:1620.
62. Stratesteffen H, Köpf M, Kreimendahl F, et al., 2017, GelMA- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y
collagen Blends Enable Drop-on-demand 3D Printablility 73. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015,
and Promote Angiogenesis. Biofabrication, 9:045002. Synthesis, Properties, and Biomedical Applications of
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa857c Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels. Biomaterials,
63. Lee J, Yeo M, Kim W, et al., 2018, Development of a Tannic 73:254–71.
Acid Cross-linking Process for Obtaining 3D Porous Cell- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
laden Collagen Structure. Int J Biol Macromol, 110:497–503. 74. Chen YC, Lin RZ, Qi H, et al., 2012, Functional Human
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017 Vascular Network Generated in Photocrosslinkable Gelatin
64. Wang C, Yue H, Huang W, et al., 2020, Cryogenic 3D Methacrylate Hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater, 22:2027–39.
Printing of Heterogeneous Scaffolds with Gradient https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101662
Mechanical Strengths and Spatial Delivery of Osteogenic 75. Koshy ST, Ferrante TC, Lewin SA, et al., 2014, Injectable,
Peptide/TGF-β1 for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration. Porous, and Cell-responsive Gelatin Cryogels. Biomaterials,
Biofabrication, 12:025030. 35:2477–87.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab7ab5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.044
65. Tong X, Pan W, Su T, et al., 2020, Recent Advances in Natural 76. Wei D, Xiao W, Sun J, et al., 2015, A Biocompatible Hydrogel
Polymer-based Drug Delivery Systems. React Funct Polym, with Improved Stiffness and Hydrophilicity for Modular
148:104501. Tissue Engineering Assembly. J Mater Chem B, 3:2753–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104501 https://doi.org/10.1039/c5tb00129c
66. Catoira MC, Fusaro L, Di Francesco D, et al., 2019, 77. Liu Y, Chan-Park MB, 2010, A Biomimetic Hydrogel Based
Overview of Natural Hydrogels for Regenerative Medicine on Methacrylated Dextran-graft-lysine and Gelatin for 3D
Applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 30:115. Smooth Muscle Cell Culture. Biomaterials, 31:1158–70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-019-6318-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009
67. Kim HJ, Kim MK, Lee KH, et al., 2017, Effect of Degumming 78. Wang Y, Ma M, Wang J, et al., 2018, Development of a Photo-
Methods on Structural Characteristics and Properties of Crosslinking, Biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA Hydrogel for
Regenerated Silk. Int J Biol Macromol, 104:294–302. Guided Bone Regeneration Materials. Materials (Basel),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.019 11:1345.
68. Rasheed T, Bilal M, Zhao Y, et al., 2019, Physiochemical https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081345
Characteristics and Bone/Cartilage Tissue Engineering 79. Mobasheri A, Rayman MP, Gualillo O, et al., 2017, The Role
Potentialities of Protein-based Macromolecules a Review. Int of Metabolism in the Pathogenesis of Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev
J Biol Macromol, 121:13–22. Rheumatol, 13:302–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.50

28 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3