Page 102 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Progress in bioprinting of bone

silk fibroin-gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage Med, 9: 1–10.
differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three- 67. Fratzl P, Gupta H, Paschalis E, et al., 2004, Structure and
dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater, 11: 233–246.
mechanical quality of the collagen-mineral nano-composite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.023 in bone. J Mater Chem, 14: 2115–2123.
57. Sabapathy V, Kumar S, 2016, hiPSC-derived iMSCs: https://doi.org/10.1039/B402005G
NextGen MSCs as an advanced therapeutically active cell 68. Kreimendahl F, Köpf M, Thiebes AL, et al., 2017, Three-
resource for regenerative medicine. J Cell Mol Med, 20: dimensional printing and angiogenesis: tailored agarose-
1571–1588.
type i collagen blends comprise three-dimensional
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12839 printability and angiogenesis potential for tissue-engineered
substitutes. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 23: 604–615.
58. Fedorovich NE, Wijnberg HM, Dhert WJ, et al., 2011,
Distinct tissue formation by heterogeneous printing of https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0234
osteo-and endothelial progenitor cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 69. Karageorgiou V, Meinel L, Hofmann S, et al., 2004, Bone
17: 2113–2121.
morphogenetic protein-2 decorated silk fibroin films induce
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0019 osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal
cells. J Biomed Mater Res A, 71: 528–537.
59. Gruene M, Pflaum M, Hess C, et al., 2011, Laser printing
of three-dimensional multicellular arrays for studies of cell- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30186
cell and cell-environment interactions. Tissue Eng Part C 70. Zhao L, Jiang S, Hantash BM, 2010, Transforming growth
Methods, 17: 973–982.
factor β1 induces osteogenic differentiation of murine bone
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0185 marrow stromal cells. Tissue Eng Part A, 16: 725–733.
60. Merfeld-Clauss S, Gollahalli N, March KL, et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2009.0495
Adipose tissue progenitor cells directly interact with 71. Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, et al., 2008, Three-
endothelial cells to induce vascular network formation. dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned
Tissue Eng Part A, 16: 2953–2966.
constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng Part A, 14:
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0635 127–133.
61. Wu Y, Chen L, Scott PG, et al., 2007, Mesenchymal stem https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.a.2007.0158
cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and 72. Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, De Ruijter M, et al., 2017,
angiogenesis. Stem cells, 25: 2648–2659.
3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA)
https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0226 hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One, 12:
e0177628.
62. Pederson L, Ruan M, Westendorf JJ, et al., 2008, Regulation
of bone formation by osteoclasts involves wnt/bmp signaling https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628
and the chemokine sphingosine-1-phosphate. Proc Natl 73. McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting
Acad Sci U S A, 105: 20764–20769.
of gelma scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805133106 human osteoblasts. Biofabrication, 9: 015009.
63. Guihard P, Danger Y, Brounais B, et al., 2012, Induction https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bd
of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated 74. Demirtaş TT, Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M, 2017, A
monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin m bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue
signaling. Stem cells, 30: 762–772.
engineering. Biofabrication, 9: 035003.
https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1040
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1d
64. Albrektsson T, Johansson C, 2001, Osteoinduction, 75. Neufurth M, Wang X, Schröder HC, et al., 2014, Engineering
osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J, 10: a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of
S96–S101.
bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like
https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100282 saos-2 cells. Biomaterials, 35: 8810–8819.
65. Brydone A, Meek D, Maclaine S, 2010, Bone grafting, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.002
orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone 76. Pan Q, Gao C, Wang Y, et al., 2020, Investigation of bone
engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 224: 1329–1343.
reconstruction using an attenuated immunogenicity
https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM770 xenogenic composite scaffold fabricated by 3D printing. Bio
Des Manuf, 3: 396–409.
66. Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, et al., 2011, Bone
regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC 77. Golafshan N, Vorndran E, Zaharievski S, et al., 2020, Tough

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 94 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628