Page 98 - IJB-9-1
P. 98

International Journal of Bioprinting                                        Progress in bioprinting of bone



            Table 2. Summary of the studies on bone bioprinting using DBB, LBB, and AAB
             Study  Technology  Materials  Cell source Animal   Pore size   Mechanical   Compressive   Viability  Zonal structure
                                                 model  (porosity)  reinforcement modulus
            Duarte   Inkjet   COL-I,    MSCs    ---     ---      ---       18.1, 53.1 and   98% at 21   ---
            Campos            agarose                                      89.1 kPa    days
            et al. [130]
            Anada    SLA      OCP, GelMA HUVECs  ---    ---      ---       ---         ---      Peripheral
            et al. [131]                                                                        OCP-containing
                                                                                                GelMA ring +
                                                                                                central GelMA ring
                                                                                                containing HUVEC
                                                                                                spheroids
            Bernal    VBP     GelMA     ACPCs,   ---    ---      ---          266 kPa    >85%   ---
            et al. [132]                MSCs,
                                        ECFCs
            Heo     AAB       Cell      hMSCs,   ---    ---      ---       ---         >85%     ---
            et al  [133]      spheroid  HUVECs
            SLA: Stereolithography, VBP: Volumetric bioprinting, AAB: Aspiration-assisted bioprinting, COL-I: Collagen type I, GelMA: Gelatin methacrylate,
            OCP: Octacalcium phosphate, MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells, HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, ACPCs: Articular Cartilage-resident
            chondroprogenitor cells, ECFCs: Endothelial colony forming cells, hMSCs: Human MSCs

            Table 3. Summary of the studies on bone bioprinting using hybrid processes
             Study   Technology  Materials    Cell source  Animal   Pore size   Mechanical   Compressive   Zonal structure
                                                       model   (porosity)  reinforcement  modulus
            Cui      Extrusion+ SLA PLA, GelMA,   hMSCs and  ---  260 μm (20%) PLA fibers  Construct: 0.38   Vascularized
            et al. [53]          BMP-2 and VEGF  HUVECs                              GPa; Hydrogel: 10  construct
                                 peptides                                            – 30 kPa     with capillary
                                                                                                  networks
            Rukavina    Extrusion +   Fibrinogen,   HUVECs  SCID mice ---  ---       ---          PCL frame
            et al. [134]  DoD    Gelatin, HA,   ADSCs
                                 Glycerol, VEGF,
                                 bFGF, HAp, PCL
            SLA: Stereolithography, DoD: Drop-on-demand, PLA: Polylactic acid, GelMA: Gelatin methacrylate, BMP-2: Bone morphogenetic protein 2,
            VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor, HA: Hyaluronic acid, bFGF: basic fibroblast growth factor, HAp: Hydroxyapatite, PCL: Polycaprolactone,
            hMSCs: Human mesenchymal stem cells, HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, ADSCs: Adipose-derived stem cells

            spheroids  was  significantly  higher  than  that  in  hMSC-  fibers and GelMA hydrogel to reproduce a vascularized
            only spheroids. The addition of HUVECs also promoted   Haversian system of bone tissue. In the manufacturing
            the osteogenic differentiation of cells. The hMSC/HUVEC   process, the polydopamine (pDA)-coated PLA scaffold
            spheroids showed a higher expression of COL1, ALP, and   (bone region) was immobilized with BMP-2 peptides, and
            bone sialoprotein (BSP) compared to control groups (2D   then, VEGF peptides were conjugated to GelMA chains
            cultured hMSC and hMSC-only spheroids). This strategy   (vascular region). PLA scaffolds were pre-seeded with
            provided a new possibility for printing bone tissue with   hMSCs,  whereas  hMSCs  and  HUVECs  were  embedded
            anatomically-relevant cell density. Table 2 summarizes the   at a 1:1 ratio in the GelMA hydrogel, where the pDA- and
            above-mentioned studies on bone bioprinting using DBB,   BMP-2-modification was found to promote cell growth
            LBB, and AAB and the properties of the bioprinted bone   and spread on the scaffold and the BMP-2 benefited
            constructs.                                        osteogenesis. In a dynamic culture of perfusion, notable

            3.5. Hybrid bioprinting of bone                    osteogenesis and the formation of vascular networks can
                                                               be observed, as indicated by the higher expression of COL-
            To replicate a bone construct with interior vascular   I, Ca deposition, and VEGF than in static culture.
            networks, hybrid bioprinting processes which integrated
            EBB and LBB or DBB have been reported. Cui et al.  used   Combined bioprinting of ADSCs and HUVECs has
                                                    [53]
            a hybrid bioprinting platform composed of FDM and SLA.   also been reported to promote vascularization in bioprinted
            Using this technique, they deposited polylactide (PLA)   bone tissue [134] . ADSCs underwent osteogenic differentiation


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         90                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103