Page 99 - IJB-9-1
P. 99
International Journal of Bioprinting Progress in bioprinting of bone
for 7 days before being added into the hydrogel composite Acknowledgment
(containing fibrinogen, gelatin, HA, glycerol, HAp, VEGF,
basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF], and aprotinin), which None.
was subsequently extruded. An array of droplets was deposited Funding
through drop-on-demand bioprinting of HUVECs-loaded
hydrogel composite (including fibrinogen, VEGF, bFGF, and This work was funded by the National Natural Science
aprotinin) after every second layer of ADSC-laden bioink Foundation of China (grant number 52205305), the
was printed. The bioprinted construct was enclosed by a GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
PCL frame to ease transportation and was, then, implanted (grant number 2020A1515110724), and the Open
subcutaneously into mice. On 12-day implantation, large Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and
volumes of calcified ECM, as well as blood vessels with lumens, Mechatronic Systems (grant number: GZKF-202004).
were observed. Table 3 summarizes the above-mentioned
studies on bone bioprinting using hybrid processes and the Conflict of interest
properties of the bioprinted bone constructs. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest
concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of
4. Conclusion and future prospects this article.
The advancement of bone bioprinting with the use of
various hydrogels, cell types, and other osteoconductive Author contributions
components has recently been remarkable, with several Conceptualization: Yang Wu
studies presenting mineralized structures with the Funding acquisition: Yang Wu
vascularized network. It takes a considerable period (until Visualization: Yang Wu, Ming Li
the healing and remodeling process is complete) to create Writing - original draft: Yang Wu, Ming Li, Hao Su
a durable structure with appropriate mechanical properties Writing - review & editing: Yang Wu, Ming Li, Hao Su,
and physiological functions, which requires a balance Huaying Chen, Yonggang Zhu
between bioink degradation and tissue regeneration [135] .
It is also challenging to develop large-scale vascularized References
bone grafts that meet the requirements of the clinical 1. Eliaz N, Metoki N, 2017, Calcium phosphate bioceramics:
setting and easy integration with host tissue [136] . As a review of their history, structure, properties, coating
discussed herein, researchers are striving to provide technologies and biomedical applications. Materials (Basel),
solutions to tackle the limitations in bone bioprinting, 10: 334.
and it is recommended that constant efforts are made to
integrate acellular scaffolds with cellular bioinks to modify https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040334
the mechanical properties of bioprinted bone . It is 2. Fratzl P, Weinkamer R, 2007, Nature’s hierarchical materials.
[13]
anticipated that more advanced processes and bioprinters Prog Mater Sci, 52: 1263–1334.
will be developed that can deposit both cellular and non- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.06.001
cellular biomaterials with high efficiency, biocompatibility, 3. Koester KJ, Ager J, Ritchie R, 2008, The true toughness
and control over printing conditions (e.g., temperature, of human cortical bone measured with realistically short
oxygen tension, and humidity). The piezoelectric nature of Cracks. Nat Mater, 7: 672–677.
bone aids in promoting bone adaptation and remodeling
by electromechanical mechanisms [137] . Hence, the addition https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2221
of electromagnetic materials as a means of controlling 4. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P, 1998, Mechanical
the microenvironment of bioprinted bone might prove properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med Eng
to be an effective avenue in the future when it comes Phys, 20: 92–102.
to discovering new bioinks for bone bioprinting. For https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00007-1
instance, currently available bioinks can be incorporated
with conduction polymers, such as carbon nanotubes 5. Ke P, Jiao XN, Ge XH, et al., 2014, From macro to micro:
Structural biomimetic materials by electrospinning. RSC
and graphene, to provide structural stability, guide cell Adv, 4: 39704–39724.
growth, as well as stimulate bone formation [138] . A large
number of biomaterials are expected to be developed in the https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA05098C
future to achieve functional 3D bone bioprinting, which 6. Vallet-Regí M, Navarrete DA, Arcos D, 2008, Biomimetic
can be achieved with the integration of multidisciplinary nanoceramics in clinical use: from materials to applications.
knowledge and continuous financial support. London, UK: Royal society of chemistry.
Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 91 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628

