Page 101 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Progress in bioprinting of bone

ti-6al-4v implant to treat bone Cancer. Bio Des Manuf, 4: analysis of peripheral blood-and bone marrow-derived
879–888. endothelial progenitor cells for enhanced vascularization in
bone tissue engineering. J Orthop Res, 30: 1507–1515.
33. Li X, Yuan Y, Liu L, et al., 2020, 3D printing of hydroxyapatite/
tricalcium phosphate scaffold with hierarchical porous https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22097
structure for bone regeneration. Bio Des Manuf, 3: 15–29. 46. Samorezov JE, Alsberg E, 2015, Spatial regulation of
34. Dong Y, Duan H, Zhao N, et al., 2018, Three-dimensional controlled bioactive factor delivery for bone tissue
printing of β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium silicate engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 84: 45–67.
composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bio Des https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.018
Manuf, 1: 146–156.
47. Santos MI, Reis RL, 2010, Vascularization in bone tissue
35. Zhang B, Sun H, Wu L, et al., 2019, 3D printing of calcium engineering: Physiology, current strategies, major hurdles
phosphate bioceramic with tailored biodegradation rate for and future challenges. Macromol Biosci, 10: 12–27.
skull bone tissue reconstruction. Bio Des Manuf, 2: 161–171.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200900107
36. Oladapo BI, Zahedi SA, Ismail SO, et al., 2021, 3D printing
of peek-chap scaffold for medical bone implant. Bio Des 48. Kirkpatrick CJ, Fuchs S, Unger RE, 2011, Co-culture systems
Manuf, 4: 44–59. for vascularization-learning from nature. Adv Drug Deliv
Rev, 63: 291–299.
37. Wang X, Schröder HC, Wang K, et al., 2012, Genetic,
biological and structural hierarchies during sponge spicule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.01.009
formation: From soft sol-gels to solid 3d silica composite 49. Brennan MA, Davaine JM, Layrolle P, 2013, Pre-
structures. Soft Matter, 8: 9501–9518. vascularization of bone tissue-engineered constructs. Stem
38. Wiens M, Wang X, Schröder HC, et al., 2010, The role Cell Res Ther, 4: 1–3.
of biosilica in the osteoprotegerin/rankl ratio in human https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt307
osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials, 31: 7716–7725.
50. Mishra R, Roux BM, Posukonis M, et al., 2016, Effect
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.002 of prevascularization on in vivo vascularization of poly
39. Nguyen LH, Annabi N, Nikkhah M, et al., 2012, Vascularized (propylene fumarate)/fibrin scaffolds. Biomaterials, 77:
bone tissue engineering: Approaches for potential 255–266.
improvement. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 18: 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.026
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0012 51. Wüst S, Godla ME, Müller R, et al., 2014, Tunable hydrogel
40. Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, et al., 2014, Bone regenerative composite with two-step processing in combination
medicine: Classic options, novel strategies, and future with innovative hardware upgrade for cell-based three-
directions. J Orthop Surg Res, 9: 18. dimensional bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10: 630–640.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-9-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.016
41. Wang J, Yang M, Zhu Y, et al., 2014, Phage nanofibers induce 52. Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, et al., 2017, Bioprinted
vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds. Adv osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D
Mater, 26: 4961–4966. bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 1700015.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400154 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700015
42. Wang MO, Vorwald CE, Dreher ML, et al., 2015, Evaluating 53. Cui H, Zhu W, Nowicki M, et al., 2016, Hierarchical
3D-printed biomaterials as scaffolds for vascularized bone fabrication of engineered vascularized bone biphasic
tissue engineering. Adv Mater, 27: 138–144. constructs via dual 3D bioprinting: Integrating regional
bioactive factors into architectural design. Adv Healthc
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201403943 Mater, 5: 2174–2181.
43. Whang K, Healy K, Elenz D, et al., 1999, Engineering https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600505
bone regeneration with bioabsorbable scaffolds with novel
microarchitecture. Tissue Eng, 5: 35–51. 54. Rodan SB, Imai Y, Thiede MA, et al., 1987, Characterization
of a human osteosarcoma cell line (saos-2) with osteoblastic
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.1999.5.35 properties. Cancer Res, 47: 4961–4966.
44. Lee H, Ahn S, Bonassar LJ, et al., 2013, Cell (MC3T3-E1)- 55. Hausser HJ, Brenner RE, 2005, Phenotypic instability of
printed poly (∈-caprolactone)/alginate hybrid scaffolds for saos-2 cells in long-term culture. Biochem Biophys Res
tissue regeneration. Macromol Rapid Commun, 34: 142–149. Commun, 333: 216–222.
https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.201200524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.097
45. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP, 2012, Differential 56. Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ, et al., 2015, Bioprintable, cell-laden

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 93 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628