Page 103 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Progress in bioprinting of bone

magnesium phosphate-based 3D-printed implants induce nanocomposites with high mechanical properties and
bone regeneration in an equine defect model. Biomaterials, excellent osteogenic bioactivity for bone tissue engineering.
261: 120302. Bio Des Manuf, 4: 243–257.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120302 89. Lee CH, Rodeo SA, Fortier LA, et al., 2014, Protein-releasing
polymeric scaffolds induce fibrochondrocytic differentiation
78. Liu D, Nie W, Li D, et al., 2019, 3D Printed PCL/SrHA
scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J, 362: of endogenous cells for knee meniscus regeneration in
269–279. sheep. Sci Transl Med, 6: 266ra171.
79. Sun H, Hu C, Zhou C, et al., 2020, 3D Printing of calcium https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3009696
phosphate scaffolds with controlled release of antibacterial 90. Ding C, Qiao Z, Jiang W, et al., 2013, Regeneration of
functions for jaw bone repair. Mater Des, 189: 108540. a goat femoral head using a tissue-specific, biphasic
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108540 scaffold fabricated with cad/cam technology. Biomaterials,
34: 6706–6716.
80. e Silva EP, Huang B, Helaehil JV, et al., 2021, In Vivo study of
conductive 3D printed pcl/mwcnts scaffolds with electrical https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.038
stimulation for bone tissue engineering. Bio Des Manuf, 4: 91. Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, et al., 2016, A 3D bioprinting
190–202. system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with
81. Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, et al., 2012, structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol, 34: 312–319.
Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3413
printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds.
Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 18: 33–44. 92. Raja N, Yun HS, 2016, A simultaneous 3D printing process
for the fabrication of bioceramic and cell-laden hydrogel
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2011.0060 core/shell scaffolds with potential application in bone tissue
82. Shoichet MS, Li RH, White ML, et al., 1996, Stability of regeneration. J Mater Chem B, 4: 4707–4716.
hydrogels used in cell encapsulation: an in vitro comparison https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB00849F
of alginate and agarose. Biotechnol Bioeng, 50: 374–381.
93. Araldi E, Schipani E, 2010, Hypoxia, HIFs and bone
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960520)50:4<3 development. Bone, 47: 190–196.
74::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO;2-I
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.04.606
83. Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Wei M, 2017, Development of a
novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel 94. Fan W, Crawford R, Xiao Y, 2010, Enhancing In Vivo
for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. vascularized bone formation by cobalt chloride-treated
J Biomed Mater Res A, 105: 1457–1468. bone marrow stromal cells in a tissue engineered periosteum
model. Biomaterials, 31: 3580–3589.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36036
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.083
84. Kim WJ, Yun HS, Kim GH, 2017, An innovative cell-laden
α-tcp/collagen scaffold fabricated using a two-step printing 95. Mamalis AA, Cochran DL, 2011, The therapeutic potential
process for potential application in regenerating hard of oxygen tension manipulation via hypoxia inducible
tissues. Sci Rep, 7: 3181. factors and mimicking agents in guided bone regeneration.
A Review. Arch Oral Biol, 56: 1466–1475.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03455-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.05.001
85. Mishra R, Basu B, Kumar A, 2009, Physical and
cytocompatibility properties of bioactive glass-polyvinyl 96. Boyette LB, Creasey OA, Guzik L, et al., 2014, Human bone
alcohol-sodium alginate biocomposite foams prepared via marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells display enhanced
sol-gel processing for trabecular bone regeneration. J Mater clonogenicity but impaired differentiation with hypoxic
Sci Mater Med, 20: 2493–500. preconditioning. Stem Cells Transl Med, 3: 241–254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3814-1 https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2013-0079
86. Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, Pina S, et al., 2019, Indirect printing 97. Merceron C, Vinatier C, Portron S, et al., 2010, Differential
of hierarchical patient-specific scaffolds for meniscus tissue effects of hypoxia on osteochondrogenic potential of human
engineering. Bio Des Manuf, 2: 225–241. adipose-derived stem cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 298:
C355–C364.
87. Wang Q, Ma Z, Wang Y, et al., 2021, Fabrication and
characterization of 3D printed biocomposite scaffolds based https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00398.2009
on pcl and zirconia nanoparticles. Bio Des Manuf, 4: 60–71. 98. Utting J, Robins S, Brandao-Burch A, et al., 2006, Hypoxia
88. Askari E, Rasouli M, Darghiasi SF, et al., 2021, Reduced inhibits the growth, differentiation and bone-forming
graphene oxide-grafted bovine serum albumin/bredigite capacity of rat osteoblasts. Exp Cell Res, 312: 1693–1702.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 95 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.628