Page 20 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion

32. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2022, Controlling 43. Dimitreli G, Thomareis AS, 2004, Effect of temperature
droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: key factors to and chemical composition on processed cheese apparent
achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based viscosity. J Food Eng, 64:265–271.
bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8:424.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.10.008
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424
44. Li MG, Tian XY, Chen XB, 2009, A brief review of
33. Xiong R, Zhang Z, Chai W, et al., 2017, Study of gelatin as dispensing-based rapid prototyping techniques in tissue
an effective energy absorbing layer for laser bioprinting. scaffold fabrication: Role of modeling on scaffold properties
Biofabrication, 9:024103. prediction. Biofabrication, 1:032001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa74f2 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/3/032001
34. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization- 45. Murphy S V., Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
based bioprinting—process, materials, applications and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–785.
regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12:022001.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
46. Jones N, 2012, Science in three dimensions: The print
35. Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent advances revolution. Nature, 487:22–23.
in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat https://doi.org/10.1038/487022a
polymerization-based 3D printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 9:1–18.
47. Rutz AL, Hyland KE, Jakus AE, et al., 2015, A multimaterial
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156
bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible
36. Pääkkönen T, Dimic-Misic K, Orelma H, et al., 2016, hydrogels. Adv Mater, 27:1607–1614.
Effect of xylan in hardwood pulp on the reaction rate of https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405076
TEMPO-mediated oxidation and the rheology of the final
nanofibrillated cellulose gel. Cellulose, 23:277–293. 48. Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Puster U, et al., 2016,
Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0824-7
to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv
37. Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gardiner MD, et al., 2017, Healthc Mater, 5:326–333.
3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery: Principles, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677
applications and challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg,
70(9):1155–1170. 49. Jin Y, Zhao D, Huang Y, 2018, Study of extrudability and
standoff distance effect during nanoclay-enabled direct
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.001
printing. Bio-Des Manuf, 1:123–134.
38. Giuseppe M di, Law N, Webb B, et al., 2018, Mechanical https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-018-0009-y
behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 79:150–157. 50. Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, et al., 2015, 3D
bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.018
alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
39. Ning L, Gil CJ, Hwang B, et al., 2020, Biomechanical factors Biomacromolecules, 16:1489–1496.
in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting. Appl Phys Rev, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188
7:041319.
51. Athukoralalage SS, Balu R, Dutta NK, et al., 2019, 3D
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023206
bioprinted nanocellulose-based hydrogels for tissue
40. Kawabe S, Seki M, Tabata H, 2014, Investigation of the engineering applications: A brief review. Polymers, 11(5):898.
sol-gel transition of gelatin using terahertz time-domain https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050898
spectroscopy. J Appl Phys, 115:143103.
52. Han C, Wang X, Ni Z, et al., 2020, Effects of nanocellulose on
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870954
alginate/gelatin bio-inks for extrusion-based 3D printing.
41. Liu F, Chen Q, Liu C, et al., 2018, Natural polymers for organ BioResources, 15:7357–7373.
3D bioprinting. Polymers (Basel), 10:1278.
https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.4.7357-7373
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10111278
53. Fakhruddin K, Hamzah MSA, Razak SIA, 2018, Effects of
42. Kačarević ŽP, Rider PM, Alkildani S, et al., 2018, An extrusion pressure and printing speed of 3D bioprinted
introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and construct on the fibroblast cells viability. IOP Conf Ser:
future aspects. Materials, 11:2199. Mater Sci Eng, 440:012042.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112199 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/440/1/012042

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 12 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.621