Page 16 - IJB-9-1
P. 16

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion

































            Figure 8. Gene expression analysis. There are only two biological replicates in 28-day group, while the number of replicates of other groups is indicated in
            Materials and methods. Note: ****P < 0.0001.
            during culture in the construct; nonetheless, the change   low viscosity provide a cell-friendly environment for longer
            was statistically insignificant.                   culturing periods although their printability is usually
                                                               poor [47,48] . The amplitude sweep test proved that a lower
            4. Discussion                                      gelatin content corresponded with the occurrence of cross-

            This work focused on the formulation of a bioink   over at lower strain rates. Concomitantly, higher G’ values
            composed of alginate, gelatin, and CCNC for meniscal 3D   were observed for bioinks with a higher gelatin content,
            bioprinting. Rheological analysis enabled us to determine   which improves material strength but may result in poor
                                                                        [49]
            the optimal concentration of components.           printability . Taking into account the entire viscosity
                                                               range and the temperature sweep test, the composition of
               Firstly,  the  temperature  sweep  test  was  performed  to   bioink B with a gelatin content of 4.0% has the most suitable
            establish an optimal gelatin content, since gelatin contributes   rheological properties for 3D bioprinting and was chosen
            the most to the temperature-dependent rheological   for further analysis. More precisely, the pivotal impact on
            properties of bioinks [37,39] . The onset of a significant decrease   this selection includes the broad LVE region, the reasonably
            in G’ was observed for all bioinks at 28°C, which is closely   high G’ values, and the cross-over occurrence after a non-
            related to the sol-gel transition temperature of gelatin [40,41] .   rapid decrease of the storage modulus of bioink B.
            Overall, gelatin is suitable for bioprinting at temperatures
            below 28°C [41,42] . These results imply that the bioink should   The amplitude  sweep tests of bioinks with different
            be cooled to at least 25°C before bioprinting.     alginate concentrations (bioinks B, D, and E) revealed the
                                                               complexity of their viscoelastic properties and the inability
               The shear-thinning behavior is another essential   to predict their properties solely from the concentrations
            property of bioinks, which allows for precise and stable   of their  constituents. The optimization of the alginate
            prints [43,44] . Bioink viscosities in the range of 30 mPa·s    concentration is not only crucial for the printability and
                                                         −1
            to over 6·10  mPa·s  are considered compatible for 3D   mechanical properties of the construct, but also for cell
                      7
                            −1
            extrusion bioprinting, and the viscosities of bioinks   viability and proliferation [41,50] . Based on the rheological
            A, B, and C were within this range [45,46] . An increased   tests and the biological properties of alginate, the 0.75%
            concentration of gelatin stiffens the bioinks within the   alginate concentration was selected for further studies.
            tested temperature range and ensures better printability and
            stability of bioprinted constructs. However, an excessive   Lastly, the rheological dissimilarities between bioinks
            gelatin content may negatively affect the printing process   with different CCNC concentrations (bioinks D, F, and G)
            due to nozzle clogging or non-uniform bioink flow. Higher   were assessed. This component has a significant impact
            viscosity also causes cellular damage; hence, bioinks with   on bioink reinforcement and the improvement of shear-


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         8                       https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.621
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21