Page 218 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting FeS /PCL scaffold for bone regeneration
2

9. Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF, 2006, Bone graft 26. Kikuchi M, Itoh S, Ichinose S, et al., 2001, Self-organization
substitutes. Expert Rev Med Devices, 3(1): 49–57. mechanism in a bone-like hydroxyapatite/collagen
nanocomposite synthesized in vitro and its biological
10. Vacanti JP, Langer R. 1999, Tissue engineering: The design
and fabrication of living replacement devices for surgical reaction in vivo. Biomaterials, 22(13): 1705–1711.
reconstruction and transplantation. Lancet, 354: S32–S34. 27. Rezwan K, Chen Q, Blaker JJ, et al., 2006, Biodegradable and
bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for
11. Chang H-I, Wang Y, 2011, Regenerative Medicine and Tissue bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 27(18): 3413–3431.
Engineering—Cells and Biomaterials, Eberli D editor, UK:
InTech. 28. Place ES, George JH, Williams CK, et al., 2009, Synthetic
polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem Soc Rev,
12. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A, 2012, Recent advances in
bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol, 30(10): 38(4): 1139–1151.
546–554. 29. Liu D, Nie W, Li D, et al., 2019, 3D printed PCL/SrHA scaffold
for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J, 362: 269–279.
13. Saunders RE, Derby B. 2014, Inkjet printing biomaterials for
tissue engineering: Bioprinting. Int Mater Rev, 59(8): 430–448. 30. Cho YS, Quan M, Kang N-U, et al., 2020, Strategy for
enhancing mechanical properties and bone regeneration of
14. Gudapati H, Dey M, Ozbolat I, 2016, A comprehensive
review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and 3D polycaprolactone kagome scaffold: Nano hydroxyapatite
future. Biomaterials, 102: 20–42. composite and its exposure. Eur Polym J, 134: 109814.
31. Zhang Y, Yu W, Ba Z, et al., 2018, 3D-printed scaffolds of
15. Melchels FP, Feijen J, Grijpma DW, 2010, A review on
stereolithography and its applications in biomedical mesoporous bioglass/gliadin/polycaprolactone ternary
engineering. Biomaterials, 31(24): 6121–6130. composite for enhancement of compressive strength,
degradability, cell responses and new bone tissue ingrowth.
16. Skoog SA, Goering PL, Narayan RJ, 2014, Stereolithography Int J Nanomed, 13: 5433.
in tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 25(3):
845–856. 32. Yang GH, Yeo M, Choi E, et al., 2021, Investigating the
physical characteristics and cellular interplay on 3D-printed
17. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and scaffolds depending on the incorporated silica size for hard
future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. tissue regeneration. Mater Des, 207: 109866.
Biomaterials, 76: 321–343.
33. Wu Y-HA, Chiu Y-C, Lin Y-H, et al., 2019, 3D-printed
18. Paxton N, Smolan W, Böck T, et al., 2017, Proposal to assess bioactive calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone bioscaffolds
printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting modified with biomimetic extracellular matrices for bone
and evaluation of rheological properties governing regeneration. Int J Mol Sci, 20(4): 942.
bioprintability. Biofabrication, 9(4): 044107.
34. Kim JA, Yun H-s, Choi Y-A, et al., 2018, Magnesium
19. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of phosphate ceramics incorporating a novel indene
biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120(19): 10793–10833. compound promote osteoblast differentiation in vitro and
20. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization- bone regeneration in vivo. Biomaterials, 157: 51–61.
based bioprinting—Process, materials, applications and 35. Jeon H, Yun S, Choi E, et al., 2019, Proliferation and
regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12(2): 022001. osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells
21. Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, in PCL/silanated silica composite scaffolds for bone tissue
Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging regeneration. J Ind Eng Chem, 79: 41–51.
technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 36. Zhou J, Chen K-M, Zhi D-J, et al., 2015, Effects of pyrite
6(1): 011310. bioleaching solution of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on
22. Du X, Fu S, Zhu Y, 2018, 3D printing of ceramic-based viability, differentiation and mineralization potentials of rat
scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: An overview. J Mater osteoblasts. Arch Pharm Res, 38(12): 2228–2240.
Chem B, 6(27): 4397–4412. 37. Liu L, Zhao G, Gao Q, et al., 2017, Changes of mineralogical
23. Liu X, Ma PX, 2004, Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue characteristics and osteoblast activities of raw and processed
engineering. Ann Biomed Eng, 32(3): 477–486. pyrites. RSC Adv, 7(45): 28373–28382.
24. Eivazzadeh‐Keihan R, Bahojb Noruzi E, Khanmohammadi 38. Zhang L, Zheng Y, Xiong C, 2015, Fabrication and
Chenab K, et al., 2020, Metal‐based nanoparticles for bone characterization of PDLLA/pyrite composite bone scaffold
tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 14(12): 1687–1714. for osteoblast culture. Bull Mater Sci, 38(3): 811–816.
25. Porter JR, Ruckh TT, Popat KC, 2009, Bone tissue 39. Pei Z, Zhang K, Li P, et al., 2020, Zi-Ran-Tong loaded brushite
engineering: A review in bone biomimetics and drug bone cement with enhanced osteoblast mineralization
delivery strategies. Biotechnol Prog, 25(6): 1539–1560. ability in vitro. Mater Lett, 259: 126908.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023)
V 210 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.636