Page 49 - IJB-9-1
P. 49

International Journal of Bioprinting                        Effect of ionic crosslinking on composite membranes


            area of alginate-based composite bioscaffolds exhibited   The penetration of Ca   ions would be increased with
                                                                                  2+
            a sheet shape microstructure similar to that for alginate   soaking time. After a relative long soaking time, a large
            bioscaffold. The degree of sheet shape microstructure   amount of Ca ion would penetrate into the microstructure
                                                                         2+
            would increase with ionic crosslinking time as shown in   of the alginate-based composite bioscaffolds with SFDDS
            Figures 4A and B. Some area of composite bioscaffolds   to form a strong ionic crosslinking structure containing
            would  show  a mixed  shape  containing  block  shape and   microstructures (I), (II), (III), and (IV) (Figure 7C).
            fibrous shape in the microstructure, which might be due to
            the mixed association among ALG segments and SFDDS   3.3. Structural stability and thermal stability
            segments (Figure 4B-F).                            of alginate-based composite bioscaffolds with
                                                               decellularized SFDDS
              When a large amount of SFDDS was introduced into
                                                                         2+
            the alginate-based composite bioscaffolds with 0.5 wt%   Effect of Ca ion penetration on structural stability and
            CaCl , some interactions would build up a complicated   thermal stability of alginate-based composite bioscaffolds
                2
            microstructure, as shown in Figure 6. These interactions   containing  decellularized  SFDDS  was  discussed.  TGA
            would contribute to ionic interaction between acidic group   and  difference  thermogravimetry  (DTG)  results  were
            of ALG and ammonium group of SFDDS, ionic interaction   employed to study the structural stability and thermal
            among Ca  ions, acidic groups of ALG molecules, and
                    2+
            acidic groups of SFDDS, and ionic interaction between   A
            Ca  ions and acidic groups of SFDDS. Most area of
              2+
            composite bioscaffolds would show a block shape in
            the microstructure, which might be due to the mixed
            interaction among ALG and SFDDS in the existence of
            Ca  ions, such as ADDS1T5, ADDS2T5, and AddS3T5,
              2+
            as shown in  Figures 4E,  4F,  5B,  5C, 6B,  and  6C. As the
            incorporation of SFDDS increasing, the fibrous shape and
            block  shape  microstructure  would  be  increased.  In  the
            morphology of ADDS3T5, a relative remarkable block
            shape microstructure in comparison with ADDS2T5 was
            observed which would be contributed to the complicated
            microstructure. Before penetration of Ca  ions, the non-  B
                                             2+
            ionic crosslinking structure containing microstructures
            (I), (II), and (III) was formed (Figure 7A). When the
            soaking time increased, penetration of Ca   ions would
                                               2+
            be increased to form weak ionic crosslinking structure
            containing microstructures (I), (II), and (III) (Figure 7B).

            A                      B






                                                               C

                        C










            Figure 6.  Morphology of the alginate-based composite bioscaffolds.   Figure 7.  (A) Non-ionic crosslinking structure, (B) weak ionic
            (A) ADDS3T1 (300×), (B) ADDS3T5 (300×), and (C) ADDS3T5 (100×).  crosslinking structure, and (C) strong ionic crosslinking structure.


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         41                       http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.625
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54