Page 56 - IJB-9-1
P. 56

International Journal of Bioprinting                     In situ defect detection and feedback control with P-OCT


            and  photocuring-based  bioprinting.  Extrusion-based   monitoring and 3D imaging detection of internal defects
            bioprinting employs pneumatic, mechanical or ram   in 3D bioprinting. Simeunović and Hoelzle developed
            extruders to dispense materials, and other biological   non-linear and linearized models of extrusion-based
            molecules. Using extrusion-based bioprinters, various   printing dynamics to avoid adversely impacting flow
            biopolymers and multiple cell types encapsulated in   rate and achieve accurate material delivery at start-stop
            hydrogels can be deposited in a defined trajectory to   points .  Armstrong  et al.  presented  an  iteration-to-
                                                                    [13]
            fabricate constructs with specific biological features .   iteration process monitoring system that enabled direct
                                                        [7]
            Extrusion-based bioprinting has been widely used with the   process feedback in material deposition based on the
            main advantages of a wide selection of biomaterials, low-  laser displacement scanner integrated to the printing
            cost equipment, and the ability to maintain great control of   platform [6,18] . They modified the spatial material placement
            porosity and pore interconnectivity, which are important   error and the material width error, and developed process
            for proper cell growth in scaffolds . Tissue scaffolds play   control strategies based on the measured errors to adjust
                                       [8]
            an very important role in the process of tissue engineering   control inputs and ultimately eliminate material deposition
            for the growth of new or repairs of defected tissue .   errors. However, the laser displacement scanner can only
                                                        [7]
            However, researchers face some challenges in maintaining   provide surface profile information without penetration
            the desired 3D structure due to the system assembly error,   and  3D  structural  reconstruction;  quantification  and
            nozzle calibration error, unstable material rheological   overall  fidelity  evaluation  of  large  constructs  were  not
            properties, and unstable environmental control errors. In   provided. With 3D-DIC, Holzmond et al. monitored the
            this study, we focus on the material deposition error due to   surface geometry of a printed part to detect and locate
            the lack of online monitoring and feedback control, which   defects in parts produced by a fused filament fabrication
            limits the implementation of high-fidelity structures.  3D printer . They produced a point cloud model using
                                                                        [17]
              Material deposition errors result in deviations in the   a visualization toolkit based on GCode originally sent to
            material path, filament size (FS), layer thickness (LT), pore   the printer. Errors were detected and located by comparing
            size (PS), volume porosity (VP), and porosity connectivity   the 3D-DIC measurement data with the reference point
            (PC) between the printed structure and design model. In   cloud model. The measured errors and defect locations are
            tissue-engineering scaffolds, specific PS values are required   prerequisites for subsequent feedback control and defect
            to accommodate cell growth and tissue regeneration [8,9] . 3D   repair.  In situ defect detection and quantitative analysis,
            porous interconnected structures can facilitate cell growth   feedback control, and defect repair are the main challenges
            and the transport of nutrients and metabolic waste, which   in high-fidelity 3D printing.
            is  beneficial  for  large-size  tissue  repair [9,10] .  High-fidelity   In the previous work, 3D extrusion-based bioprinter-
            structures can ensure that the constructs perfectly match   associated optical coherence tomography (3D P-OCT) has
            the tissue defect site and provide sufficient mechanical   been proposed . OCT is a non-destructive, label-free,
                                                                           [19]
                                               [11]
            support, particularly for bone defect repair . Moreover,   high-resolution, and fast tomographic imaging technique
            low fidelity can affect the consistency between drug   that are widely used in the biomedical and industrial
            screening and disease models . Insufficient product quality   testing fields [20,21] . OCT enables 3D volumetric imaging
                                  [12]
            assurance could lead to increased lead-times, operational   with micron-scale resolution over centimeter length scales
            costs, and part waste. Therefore, an increasing number of   and 3D P-OCT enables large-field full-depth imaging to
            researchers have become aware of the significance of high-  meet the imaging requirements of large structures. 3D
            fidelity structures and the importance of precise material   P-OCT can provide in situ process monitoring and multi-
            deposition . Material deposition errors usually lead to   parameter evaluation layer by layer during extrusion-
                    [13]
            low structural fidelity, poor consistency of constructs, and   based bioprinting including LT, FS, layer fidelity, and 3D
            insufficient functional characteristics, which are mainly   structure quantitative analysis, including material volume,
            caused  by  the  mismatch  between  the  material  extrusion   VP, and PC . This study mainly focuses on in situ defect
                                                                        [19]
            and the three-axis mechanical movement.            detection and timely feedback control for print parameter
              The incorporation of sensing and feedback control   compensation and defect repair.
            in extrusion bioprinting is one way to reduce material   In this study, three types of defects related to material
            deposition errors and improve the fidelity of the   deposition were considered, including material deposition
            constructs. At present, X-ray CT [14,15] , MRI , industrial   path, FS, and LT. Moreover, the improved quantification
                                               [16]
            camera , and 3D digital image correlation (3D-DIC)    methods using 3D P-OCT reconstructed results were
                                                        [17]
                  [13]
            are the main detection technologies commonly used in 3D   proposed for defect detection and location. On this basis,
            printing; however, there are some limitations for  in situ   a pre-built feedback mechanism was developed for timely

            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         48                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.624
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61