Page 313 - IJB-9-2
P. 313
International Journal of Bioprinting Zn-doped coatings with osteogenic and antibacterial properties
hybrid capacitors. Nanomicro Lett, 14: 106. and insight of the emergence of hydroxyapatite-ZnO
nanocomposite. Mater Charact, 176: 111107.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00839-z
35. Khan MU, Razak SI, Ansari MN, et al., 2021, Development https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111107
of biodegradable bio-based composite for bone tissue 44. Chen X, Zhang L, Liu X, et al., 2012, Preparation
engineering: Synthesis, characterization and in vitro and properties of biodegradable composites derived
biocompatible evaluation. Polymers (Basel), 13: 3611. from poly(lactide-co-glycolide), poly(L-lactide), and
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213611 nanohydroxyapatite. J Macromol Sci B, 52: 462–475.
36. Li D, Liu P, Hao F, et al., 2022, Preparation and application https://doi.org/10.1080/00222348.2012.712007
of silver/chitosan-sepiolite materials with antimicrobial 45. Mohajernia S, Hejazi S, Eslami A, et al., 2015, Modified
activities and low cytotoxicity. Int J Biol Macromol, nanostructured hydroxyapatite coating to control the
210: 337–349. degradation of magnesium alloy AZ31 in simulated body
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.015 fluid. Surf Coat Tech, 263: 54–60.
37. Ding H, Peng X, Yu X, et al., 2022, The construction of a self- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.059
assembled coating with chitosan-grafted reduced graphene 46. Shen Y, Liu W, Wen C, et al., 2012, Bone regeneration:
oxide on porous calcium polyphosphate scaffolds for bone Importance of local pH-strontium-doped borosilicate
tissue engineering. Biomed Mater, 17: 045016. scaffold. J Mater Chem, 22: 8662–8670.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ac6eab
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm16141a
38. Zhang R, Liu X, Xiong Z, et al., 2018, Novel micro/ 47. Rokusek D, Davitt C, Bandyopadhyay A, et al., 2005,
nanostructured TiO2/ZnO coating with antibacterial Interaction of human osteoblasts with bioinert and bioactive
capacity and cytocompatibility. Ceram Int, 44: 9711–9719.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.202 ceramic substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A, 75: 588–594.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30459
39. Aljohani W, Ullah MW, Zhang X, et al., 2018, Bioprinting
and its applications in tissue engineering and regenerative 48. Lian JB, Stein GS, 1992, Concepts of osteoblast growth
medicine. Int J Biol Macromol, 107: 261–275. and differentiation: basis for modulation of bone cell
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.171 development and tissue formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med,
3: 269–305.
40. Bian T, Wang L, Xing H, 2021, Preparation and biological
assessment of a ZrO2-based bone scaffold coated with https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411920030030501
hydroxyapatite and bioactive glass composite. Mater Chem 49. Silva AS, Santos LF, Mendes MC, et al., 2020, Multi-layer
Phys, 267: 124616. pre-vascularized magnetic cell sheets for bone regeneration.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124616 Biomaterials, 231: 119664.
41. Khosrowshahi A, Khoshfetrat AB, Khosrowshahi YB, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119664
et al., 2021, Cobalt content modulates characteristics and 50. Gregory CA, Gunn WG, Peister A, et al., 2004, An Alizarin
osteogenic properties of cobalt-containing hydroxyapatite red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture:
in in-vitro milieu. Mater Today Commun, 27: 102392. Comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Anal
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102392 Biochem, 329: 77–84.
42. Wang S, Liu L, Zhou X, et al., 2019, Effect of strontium- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.02.002
containing on the properties of Mg-doped wollastonite 51. Wang X, Liu S, Li M, et al., 2016, The synergistic antibacterial
bioceramic scaffolds. Biomed Eng Online, 18: 119. activity and mechanism of multicomponent metal ions-
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0739-x containing aqueous solutions against Staphylococcus aureus.
J Inorg Biochem, 163: 214–220.
43. Rajkumar P, Sarma BK, 2021, Role of Zn and Mg substitutions
on the mechanical behaviour of biomimetic hydroxyapatite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.07.019
Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 305 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.668

