Page 34 - IJB-9-2
P. 34
International Journal of Bioprinting Extrusion-based biomaterial inks
170. Li X, Deng Q, Wang S, et al., 2021, Hydroxyethyl cellulose 181. Cheng Y, Zheng F, Lu J, et al., 2014, Bioinspired
as a rheological additive for tuning the extrusion printability multicompartmental microfibers from microfluidics. Adv
and scaffold properties. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 8(2):87–98. Mater, 26(30):5184–5190.
https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0167 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400798
171. Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS, 2014, Guar gum: Processing, 182. Rajput S, Deo KA, Mathur T, et al., 2022, 2D nanosilicate for
properties and food applications—A review. J Food Sci additive manufacturing: Rheological modifier, sacrificial ink
Technol Mysore, 51(3):409–418. and support bath. Bioprinting, 25:e00187.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00187
172. Hahn L, Beudert M, Gutmann M, et al., 2021, From 183. Liu P, Mu Z, Ji M, et al., 2021, Robust carbonated structural
thermogelling hydrogels toward functional bioinks: color barcodes with ultralow ontology fluorescence as
Controlled modification and cytocompatible crosslinking. biomimic culture platform. Research, 2021: 9851609.
Macromol Biosci, 21(10):e2100122.
https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9851609
https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202100122
184. Lee S, Sani ES, Spencer AR, et al., 2020, Human-recombinant-
173. Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting elastin-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting of vascularized soft
of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ tissues. Adv Mater, 32(45):e2003915.
engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 5(18):2353–2362.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003915
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600182
185. Park B-W, Jung S-H, Das S, et al., 2020, In vivo priming
174. Sarker MD, Naghieh S, McInnes AD, et al., 2019, Bio- of human mesenchymal stem cells with hepatocyte
fabrication of peptide-modified alginate scaffolds: growth factor-engineered mesenchymal stem cells
Printability, mechanical stability and neurite outgrowth promotes therapeutic potential for cardiac repair. Sci Adv,
assessments. Bioprinting, 14:e00045. 6(13):eaay6994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00045 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay6994
175. Barrs RW, Jia J, Ward M, et al., 2021, Engineering a 186. Kim W, Kim GH, 2020, An intestinal model with a finger-
chemically defined hydrogel bioink for direct bioprinting of like villus structure fabricated using a bioprinting process
microvasculature. Biomacromolecules, 22(2):275–288. and collagen/SIS-based cell-laden bioink. Theranostics,
10(6):2495–2508.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00947
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.41225
176. Wang Q, Yang X, Wang G, et al., 2020, Osteogenic growth
peptide-loaded 3D-printed PCL scaffolds for the promotion 187. Kim W, Kim G, 2018, Intestinal villi model with blood
of osteogenesis through the ERK pathway. Mater Design, capillaries fabricated using collagen-based bioink and
193:108811. dual-cell-printing process. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,
10(48):41185–41196.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108811
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b17410
177. Guo JL, Diaz-Gomez L, Xie VY, et al., 2021, Three-
dimensional printing of click functionalized, peptide 188. Wang Y, Shi W, Kuss M, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of breast
patterned scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. cancer models for drug resistance study. ACS Biomater Sci
Bioprinting, 22:e00136. Eng, 4(12):4401–4411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00136 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01277
178. Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, et al., 2017, Gelatin-based hydrogels 189. Bhise NS, Manoharan V, Massa S, et al., 2016, A liver-
for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers Basel, 9(9): 401. on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids.
Biofabrication, 8(1):014101.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090401
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101
179. Hauptstein J, Boeck T, Bartolf-Kopp M, et al., 2020,
Hyaluronic acid-based bioink composition enabling 3D 190. Nguyen D, Hagg DA, Forsman A, et al., 2017, Cartilage
bioprinting and improving quality of deposited cartilaginous tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a
extracellular matrix. Adv Healthc Mater, 9(15):2000737. nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep UK, 7:658.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000737 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y
180. Chameettachal S, Sasikumar S, Sethi S, et al., 2019, Tissue/ 191. Li X, Deng Q, Zhuang T, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinted breast
organ-derived bioink formulation for 3D bioprinting. J 3D tumor model for structure-activity relationship study.
Print Med, 3(1):39–54. Biodesign Manuf, 3(4):361–372.
https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2018-0024 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00085-5
Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 26 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649

