Page 34 - IJB-9-2
P. 34

International Journal of Bioprinting                                      Extrusion-based biomaterial inks



            170. Li X, Deng Q, Wang S, et al., 2021, Hydroxyethyl cellulose   181. Cheng  Y,  Zheng  F,  Lu  J, et al.,  2014,  Bioinspired
               as a rheological additive for tuning the extrusion printability   multicompartmental  microfibers  from  microfluidics. Adv
               and scaffold properties. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 8(2):87–98.  Mater, 26(30):5184–5190.
               https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.0167              https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400798
            171. Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS, 2014, Guar gum: Processing,   182. Rajput S, Deo KA, Mathur T, et al., 2022, 2D nanosilicate for
               properties and food applications—A review.  J Food Sci   additive manufacturing: Rheological modifier, sacrificial ink
               Technol Mysore, 51(3):409–418.                     and support bath. Bioprinting, 25:e00187.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x          https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00187
            172. Hahn L, Beudert M, Gutmann M, et al., 2021, From   183. Liu P, Mu Z, Ji M, et al., 2021, Robust carbonated structural
               thermogelling hydrogels toward functional bioinks:   color  barcodes with  ultralow  ontology fluorescence  as
               Controlled modification  and cytocompatible  crosslinking.   biomimic culture platform. Research, 2021: 9851609.
               Macromol Biosci, 21(10):e2100122.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9851609
               https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202100122
                                                               184. Lee S, Sani ES, Spencer AR, et al., 2020, Human-recombinant-
            173. Daly AC, Cunniffe GM, Sathy BN, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinting   elastin-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting of vascularized soft
               of developmentally inspired templates for whole bone organ   tissues. Adv Mater, 32(45):e2003915.
               engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 5(18):2353–2362.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202003915
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600182
                                                               185. Park B-W, Jung S-H, Das S,  et  al., 2020, In vivo priming
            174. Sarker MD, Naghieh S, McInnes AD,  et  al., 2019, Bio-  of human mesenchymal stem cells with hepatocyte
               fabrication  of  peptide-modified  alginate  scaffolds:  growth factor-engineered mesenchymal stem cells
               Printability, mechanical stability and neurite outgrowth   promotes therapeutic potential for cardiac repair. Sci Adv,
               assessments. Bioprinting, 14:e00045.               6(13):eaay6994.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00045       https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay6994
            175. Barrs RW, Jia J, Ward M,  et  al., 2021, Engineering a   186. Kim W, Kim GH, 2020, An intestinal model with a finger-
               chemically defined hydrogel bioink for direct bioprinting of   like villus structure fabricated using a bioprinting process
               microvasculature. Biomacromolecules, 22(2):275–288.  and collagen/SIS-based cell-laden bioink. Theranostics,
                                                                  10(6):2495–2508.
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00947
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.41225
            176. Wang Q, Yang X, Wang G, et al., 2020, Osteogenic growth
               peptide-loaded 3D-printed PCL scaffolds for the promotion   187. Kim W, Kim G, 2018, Intestinal villi model with blood
               of osteogenesis through the ERK pathway. Mater Design,   capillaries fabricated using collagen-based bioink and
               193:108811.                                        dual-cell-printing process.  ACS  Appl Mater  Interfaces,
                                                                  10(48):41185–41196.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108811
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b17410
            177. Guo JL, Diaz-Gomez L, Xie VY,  et  al., 2021, Three-
               dimensional  printing  of  click  functionalized,  peptide   188. Wang Y, Shi W, Kuss M, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of breast
               patterned  scaffolds  for  osteochondral  tissue  engineering.   cancer models for drug resistance study. ACS Biomater Sci
               Bioprinting, 22:e00136.                            Eng, 4(12):4401–4411.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2021.e00136       https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01277
            178. Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, et al., 2017, Gelatin-based hydrogels   189. Bhise NS, Manoharan V, Massa S, et al., 2016, A liver-
               for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers Basel, 9(9): 401.   on-a-chip platform with bioprinted hepatic spheroids.
                                                                  Biofabrication, 8(1):014101.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090401
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101
            179. Hauptstein J, Boeck T, Bartolf-Kopp M, et al., 2020,
               Hyaluronic acid-based bioink composition enabling 3D   190. Nguyen D, Hagg DA, Forsman A, et al., 2017, Cartilage
               bioprinting and improving quality of deposited cartilaginous   tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a
               extracellular matrix. Adv Healthc Mater, 9(15):2000737.  nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep UK, 7:658.
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000737             https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00690-y
            180. Chameettachal S, Sasikumar S, Sethi S, et al., 2019, Tissue/  191. Li X, Deng Q, Zhuang T, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinted breast
               organ-derived bioink formulation for 3D bioprinting. J 3D   tumor model for structure-activity relationship study.
               Print Med, 3(1):39–54.                             Biodesign Manuf, 3(4):361–372.
               https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2018-0024              https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00085-5


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         26                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39