Page 31 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Extrusion-based biomaterial inks

104. Hu D, Wu D, Huang L, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of cell- hydrogel bioink containing human adipose-derived stem
laden scaffolds for intervertebral disc regeneration. Mater cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2(10):1732–1742.
Lett, 223:219–222.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.204
115. Kolan KCR, Semon JA, Bindbeutel AT, et al., 2020, Bioprinting
105. Shin YJ, Shafranek RT, Tsui JH, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting with bioactive glass loaded polylactic acid composite and
of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac human adipose stem cells. Bioprinting, 18:e00075.
decellularized extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater, 119:75–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00075
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.006 116. Aydogdu MO, Oner ET, Ekren N, et al., 2019, Comparative
106. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al., 2014, 3D characterization of the hydrogel added PLA/β-TCP scaffolds
bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue produced by 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting, 13:e00046.
constructs. Adv Mater, 26(19):3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00046
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305506 117. Zamani Y, Mohammadi J, Amoabediny G, et al., 2020,
107. Gori M, Giannitelli SM, Torre M, et al., 2020, Biofabrication Bioprinting of alginate-encapsulated pre-osteoblasts in
of hepatic constructs by 3D bioprinting of a cell-laden PLGA/β-TCP scaffolds enhances cell retention but impairs
thermogel: An effective tool to assess drug-induced osteogenic differentiation compared to cell seeding after
hepatotoxic response. Adv Healthc Mater, 9(21):e2001163. 3D-printing. Regen Eng Transl Med, 7(4):485–493.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001163 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-020-00163-1
108. Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, et al., 2017, A highly 118. Naseri E, Butler H, Macnevin W, et al., 2020, Low-temperature
printable and biocompatible hydrogel composite for direct solvent-based 3D printing of PLGA: A parametric printability
printing of soft and perfusable vasculature-like structures. study. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 46(2):173–178.
Sci Rep UK, 7(1):16902. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2019.1711389
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17198-0 119. Huang J, Huang Z, Liang Y, et al., 2021, 3D printed gelatin/
109. Suntornnond R, Tan EYS, An J, et al., 2016, A mathematical hydroxyapatite scaffolds for stem cell chondrogenic
model on the resolution of extrusion bioprinting for the differentiation and articular cartilage repair. Biomater Sci,
development of new bioinks. Materials, 9(9):756. 9(7):2620–2630.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9090756 https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM02103B
110. Lee J, Kim G, 2018, Three-dimensional hierarchical 120. Wenz A, Borchers K, Tovar GEM, et al., 2017, Bone matrix
nanofibrous collagen scaffold fabricated using fibrillated production in hydroxyapatite-modified hydrogels suitable
collagen and Pluronic F-127 for regenerating bone tissue. for bone bioprinting. Biofabrication, 9(4):044103.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10(42):35801–35811. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa91ec
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b14088 121. Bendtsen ST, Quinnell SP, Wei M, 2017, Development of a
111. Kundu J, Shim J-H, Jang J, et al., 2015, An additive novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel
manufacturing-based PCL–alginate–chondrocyte for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J
bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Biomed Mater Res A, 105(5):1457–1468.
Eng Regen Med, 9(11):1286–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36036
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1682 122. Adhikari J, Perwez MS, Das A, et al., 2021, Development of
112. Vijayavenkataraman S, Vialli N, Fuh JYH, et al., 2019, hydroxyapatite reinforced alginate–chitosan based printable
Conductive collagen/polypyrrole-b-polycaprolactone hydrogel biomaterial-ink. Nanostruct Nanoobjects, 25:100630.
for bioprinting of neural tissue constructs. Int J Bioprint, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100630
5(2.1):31–43.
123. Lin K-F, He S, Song Y, et al., 2016, Low-temperature
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.229 additive manufacturing of biomimic three-dimensional
113. Kim BS, Jang J, Chae S, et al., 2016, Three-dimensional hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration.
bioprinting of cell-laden constructs with polycaprolactone ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 8(11):6905–6916.
protective layers for using various thermoplastic polymers. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b00815
Biofabrication, 8(3):035013.
124. Gao Q, Niu X, Shao L, et al., 2019, 3D printing of complex
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035013 GelMA-based scaffolds with nanoclay. Biofabrication,
114. Narayanan LK, Huebner P, Fisher MB, et al., 2016, 11(3):035006.
3D-bioprinting of polylactic acid (PLA) nanofiber–alginate https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 23 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649