Page 32 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Extrusion-based biomaterial inks

125. Hu C, Hahn L, Yang M, et al., 2021, Improving printability 136. Cubo N, Garcia M, CaÃizo JFD, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting
of a thermoresponsive hydrogel biomaterial ink by nanoclay of functional human skin: Production and in vivo analysis.
addition. J Mater Sci, 56(1):691–705. Biofabrication, 9(11):2843–2854.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05190-5 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015006
126. Cidonio 1 G, Glinka M, Kim Y-H, et al., 2020, Nanoclay- 137. Ouyang L, Yao R, Chen X, et al., 2015, 3D printing of HEK
based 3D printed scaffolds promote vascular ingrowth ex 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs
vivo and generate bone mineral tissue in vitro and in vivo. with high cell viability and normal biological functions.
Biofabrication, 12(3):035010. Biofabrication, 7(1): 015010.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8753 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015010
127. Zhu W, Cui H, Boualam B, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting 138. Testa S, Mozetic P, Barbetta A, et al., 2017, Microfluidic-
mesenchymal stem cell-laden construct with core-shell enhanced 3D bioprinting of aligned myoblast-laden
nanospheres for cartilage tissue engineering. Nanotechnology, hydrogels leads to functionally organized myofibers in vitro
29(18): 185101. and in vivo. Biomaterials, 131:98–110.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aaafa1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.03.026
128. Swaminathan S, Hamid Q, Sun W, et al., 2019, Bioprinting 139. Pescosolido L, Schuurman W, Malda J, et al., 2011, Hyaluronic
of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models. acid and dextran-based semi-IPN hydrogels as biomaterials
Biofabrication, 11(2):025003. for bioprinting. Biomacromolecules, 12(5):1831–1838.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200178w
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aafc49
140. Park JY, Choi J-C, Shim J-H, et al., 2014, A comparative
129. Carrow JK, Kerativitayanan P, Jaiswal MK, et al., 2015, study on collagen type I and hyaluronic acid dependent cell
Polymers for bioprinting, in Essentials of 3D Biofabrication behavior for osteochondral tissue bioprinting. Biofabrication,
and Translation, Atala A and Yoo JJ, Academic Press, Boston, 6(3):035004.
229–248.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/6/3/035004
130. Nijenhuis KT, 1997, Thermoreversible Networks: Viscoelastic
Properties and Structure of Gels, 1 edn, Springer, Berlin, 141. Ma L, Li Y, Wu Y, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinted hyaluronic
Heidelberg. acid-based cell-laden scaffold for brain microenvironment
simulation. Biodesign Manuf, 3(3):164–174.
131. Lee VK, Lanzi AM, Ngo H, et al., 2014, Generation of multi-
scale vascular network system within 3D hydrogel using 3D https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00076-6
bio-printing technology. Cell Mol Bioeng, 7(3):460–472. 142. Wibowo A, Vyas C, Cooper G, et al., 2020, 3D printing of
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-014-0340-0. polycaprolactone-polyaniline electroactive scaffolds for
bone tissue engineering. Materials, 13(3):512.
132. Zhao L, Lee VK, Yoo S-S, et al., 2012, The integration of
3-D cell printing and mesoscopic fluorescence molecular https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030512
tomography of vascular constructs within thick hydrogel 143. Zhao H, Xu J, Zhang E, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting
scaffolds. Biomaterials, 33(21):5325–5332. of polythiophene materials for promoting stem cell
proliferation in a nutritionally deficient environment. ACS
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.004
Appl Mater Interfaces, 13(22):25759–25770.
133. Sun Y, Yu K, Nie J, et al., 2021, Modeling the printability https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04967
of photocuring and strength adjustable hydrogel bioink
during projection-based 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 144. Yuk H, Lu B, Lin S, et al., 2020, 3D printing of conducting
13(3):035032. polymers. Nat Commun, 11(1):1604.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba413 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15316-7
134. Iliyana P, Katharina K, Thomas S, et al., 2018, Gelatin- 145. Zhu K, Shin SR, van Kempen T, et al., 2017, Gold
methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels with defined degree of nanocomposite bioink for printing 3D cardiac constructs.
functionalization as a versatile toolkit for 3D cell culture and Adv Funct Mater, 27(12):1605352.
extrusion bioprinting. Bioengineering, 5(3):55. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201605352
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5030055 146. Mannoor MS, Jiang Z, James T, et al., 2013, 3D printed
135. Lee BH, Lum N, Seow LY, et al., 2016, Synthesis and bionic ears. Nano Lett, 13(6):2634–2639.
characterization of types A and B gelatin methacryloyl for https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4007744
bioink applications. Materials, 9(10):797.
147. Mehrotra S, Singh RD, Bandyopadhyay A, et al., 2021,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9100797 Engineering microsphere-loaded non-mulberry silk-based

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 24 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649