Page 36 - IJB-9-2
P. 36

International Journal of Bioprinting                          Scaffolds printed with light sheet stereolithography


            medical applications [1,2] . For instance, scaffolds are   require high-resolution capabilities, limiting the scaling-up
            highly porous structures as they consist of void spaces   possibilities of technology. Investigations on the pore size
            within the material. Due to their high porosity, scaffolds   have shown a positive impact on cellular behavior for
            exhibit high permeability, which allows blood vessel   pore size that ranges from ≈ 20 μm to 150 μm [25,27] , from
            ingrowth, nutrient diffusion, oxygen transport, and waste   which it was pointed out that an average pore size of 100
            removal [2-5] . In addition, the properly selected fabrication   μm may work as a promising size . Although the ideas
                                                                                           [27]
            materials [6-8] , pore size, and distribution promote the   of producing large size items with high precision have not
            adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of cells [9,10]    been integrated in the fabrication of bioengineered wound
            and influence the mechanical properties of scaffolds for   dressing, the achieved progress in tissue engineering allows
            its target applications [4,5,11] . Their structural properties and   for targeting specific scaffold’s designs and fabrication
            fabrication  technologies  are  of  great  research  interest  in   strategies to pave the way on the fabrication of this type of
            today’s tissue engineering.                        scaffolds as requested by medical specialists.
              Bioengineered wound dressing is one of the applications   Many available commercial bioengineered wound
            where scaffolds have been widely implemented in research   dressings result from technologies such as freeze-dry  and
                                                                                                        [28]
            and industry [12-14] . Wound dressings are used to protect the   electrospinning . Both technologies allow for centimeter-
                                                                           [29]
            tissue injury site from further mechanical and microbial   scale scaffold fabrication with highly porous characteristics.
            stress, and maintain proper moisture and temperature at   However, these technologies are constrained in their
                        [15]
            the wound bed . In medical field, the benefits introduced   ability to control the pore size and distribution, leading
            by  bioengineered  wound  dressings  have  contributed   to limited pore distributions with large size deviations
                                                                                                           [25]
            to an accelerated and improved healing process of the   (40 – 150 μm in the same fabrication process) and low pore
            injured tissue , including optimal management and cost   interconnectivity (tubular or superficial) [25,26,29,30] . The latter
                       [8]
            reduction of wound treatments in the health system [16-19] .   is recognized as the key feature for the permeability and
            However, the large surface-to-volume ratio characteristics   migration properties of the scaffolds.
            of wound tissues make the fabrication of engineered   On the other hand, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting
            scaffolds a complex technological challenge [20-22] . The first   has emerged as a fabrication technique, which is highly
            reason is the need of large size wound dressings. In daily   accepted, in the field of tissue engineering due to its free-
            cases, the wounds, for example, ulcers and burns, can   form 3D fabrication framework, high resolution, and
            extend from a few millimeters up to a great extension of the
            human body. Particularly, investigations on burn wound   variety of biocompatible materials. Bioprinting allows
                                                               for complex pore patterning, high repeatability, and
            dressings reported a minimum average area of 872 cm² of   interconnectivity in engineered scaffolds [9,31-33] . At present,
            a functionalized wound dressing used in a sample group   extrusion -  and jetting -based bioprinting play a
                                                                      [34]
                                                                                    [35]
            of 50 patients , requiring multiple applications of wound   major role in tissue substitute fabrication because of their
                       [23]
            dressing substitute. Furthermore, medical specialists have   capabilities to construct cell-laden scaffolds and control
            pointed out the importance of large size wound dressings   cell  density,  location, and model geometries.  Among
            by quoting that a wound dressing size between 50 × 50 mm²
            to 400 × 400 mm² is preferred by medical practitioners ,   3D bioprinting methods, both material extrusion and
                                                        [24]
            suggesting that  new  fabrication approaches  must  be   material jetting methods possess the most versatile and
            developed to reduce the cost of such large bioengineered   low-cost  configurations  to  construct  cell-laden  scaffolds
            wound dressings. The second reason lies in the fine struts   of multiple cells and soft materials (bioinks), making
                                                                                                             .
                                                               these technologies attractive options to researchers
                                                                                                          [34,35]
            that provide the scaffold’s structure with the properties to   Nevertheless, inability to fabricate sub-micron structures,
            closely mimic the native tissue microenvironment. The   their dependence on nozzles, and mechanical translational
            pores within the scaffold consist of void space within the
            material, and its physical characteristics, such as size,   stages hinder bioprinting techniques in rapid fabricating
            geometry, or interconnectivity, are determined by choosing   of large size substitutes with fine structures that mimic the
            the strut position and orientation (in other works, the   native tissue microenvironment.
            word “filament”  or “fiber”  is used to refer to strut, the   Among the 3D bioprinting technologies, vat
                        [11]
                                  [25]
            structuring element of the scaffold). Many studies have   photopolymerization (VP)-based bioprinting is currently
            shown that the pores in a scaffold not only promote the   the only technique that can fabricate with the highest
            migration of nutrients, oxygen, and cells but also influence   resolution and precision [36,37] . VP techniques use light
            the physical properties of the scaffolds, such as mechanical   radiation to harden a liquid material locally using
            properties , absorption , and permeability [3,5] . Thus, in   polymerization. By steering a laser beam or projecting a
                               [26]
                    [5]
            terms of fabrication, the pores in an engineered scaffold   two-dimensional (2D) image on the liquid material, a 3D
            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         28                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.650
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41