Page 33 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Extrusion-based biomaterial inks

3D bioprinted vascularized cardiac patches with oxygen- 158. Veronese FM, Pasut G, 2005, PEGylation, successful
releasing and immunomodulatory potential. ACS Appl approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov Today, 10(21):1451–
Mater Interfaces, 13(43):50744–50759. 1458.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c14118 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6446(05)03575-0
148. Asulin M, Michael I, Shapira A, et al., 2021, One-step 159. Floody MC, Theng BKG, Reyes P, et al., 2009, Natural
3D printing of heart patches with built-in electronics for nanoclays: Applications and future trends—A Chilean
performance regulation. Adv Sci, 8(9):2004205. perspective. Clay Miner, 44(2):161–176.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202004205 https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2009.044.2.161
149. Tian K, Bae J, Bakarich SE, et al., 2017, 3D printing of 160. Xavier JR, Thakur T, Desai P, et al., 2015, Bioactive
transparent and conductive heterogeneous hydrogel- nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: A
elastomer systems. Adv Mater, 29(10):1604827. growth-factor-free approach. ACS Nano, 9(3):3109–3118.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604827 https://doi.org/10.1021/nn507488s
150. Jia J, Richards DJ, Pollard S, et al., 2014, Engineering alginate 161. Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, et al., 2016,
as bioink for bioprinting. Acta Biomater, 10(10):4323–4331. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat Mater, 15(4):413–418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544
151. Kang D, Hong G, An S, et al., 2020, Bioprinting of 162. Liu J, Erol O, Pantula A, et al., 2019, Dual-gel 4D printing
multiscaled hepatic lobules within a highly vascularized of bioinspired tubes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11(8):8492–
construct. Small, 16(13):1905505. 8498.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b17218
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201905505
163. Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, et al., 2017, Development
152. Yegappan R, Selvaprithiviraj V, Amirthalingam S, et al.,
2018, Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal
engineering and wound healing. Carbohydr Polym, 198: application. Biofabrication, 9(3):034103.
385–400. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.086 164. Mulakkal MC, Trask RS, Ting VP, et al., 2018, Responsive
cellulose-hydrogel composite ink for 4D printing. Mater
153. Nadernezhad A, Caliskan OS, Topuz F, et al., 2019, Design, 160:108–118.
Nanocomposite bioinks based on agarose and 2D
nanosilicates with tunable flow properties and bioactivity https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.009
for 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Biomater, 2(2):796–806. 165. Zhang X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, et al., 2021, Effect of water soluble
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00665 polymer on the dispersion stability of cellulose nanofibers in
water. J Cell Sci Technol, 28(1):26–33.
154. Bertassoni LE, Cecconi M, Manoharan V, et al., 2014,
Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for https://doi.org/10.16561/j.cnki.xws.2020.01.07
vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip, 166. Lille M, Nurmela A, Nordlund E, et al., 2018, Applicability
14(13):2202–2211. of protein and fiber-rich food materials in extrusion-based
https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00030g 3D printing. J Food Eng, 220:20–27.
155. Mirdamadi E, Muselimyan N, Koti P, et al., 2019, Agarose https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.034
slurry as a support medium for bioprinting and culturing 167. Wu Y, Lin ZYW, Wenger AC, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of
freestanding cell-laden hydrogel constructs. 3D Print Addit liver-mimetic construct with alginate/cellulose nanocrystal
Manuf, 6(3):158–164. hybrid bioink. Bioprinting, 9:1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.0175 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2017.12.001
156. Fedorovich NE, Swennen I, Girones J, et al., 2009, Evaluation 168. Giachini P, Gupta SS, Wang W, et al., 2020, Additive
of photocrosslinked lutrol hydrogel for tissue printing manufacturing of cellulose-based materials with continuous,
applications. Biomacromolecules, 10(7):1689–1696. multidirectional stiffness gradients. Sci Adv, 6(8):eaay0929.
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm801463q https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay0929
157. Lewis PL, Yan M, Su J, et al., 2019, Directing the growth and 169. Gospodinova A, Nankov V, Tomov S, et al., 2021, Extrusion
alignment of biliary epithelium within extracellular matrix bioprinting of hydroxyethylcellulose-based bioink for
hydrogels. Acta Biomater, 85:84–93. cervical tumor model. Carbohydr Polym, 260:117793.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.039 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117793

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 25 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649