Page 29 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Extrusion-based biomaterial inks

62. England S, Rajaram A, Schreyer DJ, et al., 2017, Bioprinted 73. Mouser VHM, Melchels FPW, Visser J, et al., 2016, Yield
fibrin-factor XIII-hyaluronate hydrogel scaffolds stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based
with encapsulated Schwann cells and their in vitro on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage
characterization for use in nerve regeneration. Bioprinting, bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8(3):035003.
5:1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2016.12.001
74. Cleymand F, Poerio A, Mamanov A, et al., 2021, Development
63. Lee C, Abelseth E, de la Vega L, et al., 2019, Bioprinting a of novel chitosan/guar gum inks for extrusion-based 3D
novel glioblastoma tumor model using a fibrin-based bioink bioprinting: Process, printability and properties. Bioprinting,
for drug screening. Mater Today Chem, 12:78–84. 21:e00122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00122
64. Ning L, Zhu N, Mohabatpour F, et al., 2019, Bioprinting 75. Indurkar A, Bangde P, Gore M, et al., 2020, Optimization
Schwann cell-laden scaffolds from low-viscosity hydrogel of guar gum-gelatin bioink for 3D printing of mammalian
compositions. J Mater Chem B, 7(29):4538–4551. cells. Bioprinting, 20:e00101.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb00669a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00101
65. Anil Kumar S, Alonzo M, Allen SC, et al., 2019, A visible 76. Muthulakshmi L, Pavithra U, Sivaranjani V, et al.,
light-cross-linkable, fibrin-gelatin-based bioprinted 2021, A novel Ag/carrageenan–gelatin hybrid hydrogel
construct with human cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. ACS nanocomposite and its biological applications: Preparation
Biomater Sci Eng, 5(9):4551–4563. and characterization. J Mech Behav Biomed, 115:104257.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00505 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104257
66. Rodriguez MJ, Dixon TA, Cohen E, et al., 2018, 3D freeform 77. Li H, Tan YJ, Liu S, et al., 2018, Three-dimensional bioprinting
printing of silk fibroin. Acta Biomater, 71:379–387. of oppositely charged hydrogels with super strong interface
bonding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10(13):11164–11174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.035
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b19730
67. Ni T, Liu M, Zhang Y, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinting of bone
marrow mesenchymal stem cell-laden silk fibroin double 78. Lim W, Kim GJ, Kim HW, et al., 2020, Kappa-carrageenan-
network scaffolds for cartilage tissue repair. Bioconjug Chem, based dual crosslinkable bioink for extrusion type
31(8):1938–1947. bioprinting. Polymers Basel, 12(10):2377.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00298 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102377
68. Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of self- 79. Gong C, Kong Z, Wang X, 2021, The effect of agarose on 3D
standing silk-based bioink. Adv Healthc Mater, 7(6):1701026. bioprinting. Polymers Basel, 13(22):4028.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701026 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13224028
69. Wu D, Yu Y, Tan J, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting of gellan gum 80. Tan YJ, Tan X, Yeong WY, et al., 2016, Hybrid microscaffold-
and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to based 3D bioprinting of multi-cellular constructs with high
produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity. Mater compressive strength: A new biofabrication strategy. Sci Rep
Design, 160:486–495. UK, 6(1):39140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.040 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39140
70. Chen Y, Xiong X, Liu X, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinting of shear- 81. Massa S, Sakr MA, Seo J, et al., 2017, Bioprinted 3D
thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived vascularized tissue model for drug toxicity analysis.
from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate- Biomicrofluidics, 11(4):044109.
based gels. J Mater Chem B, 8(25):5500–5514.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994708
https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00060d
82. Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB, 2019, 3D
71. Zhu S, Yao L, Pan C, et al., 2021, 3D printed gellan gum/ bioprinting using cross-linker-free silk–gelatin bioink for
graphene oxide scaffold for tumor therapy and bone cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,
reconstruction. Compos Sci Technol, 208:108763. 11(37):33684–33696.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108763 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11644
72. Lozano R, Stevens L, Thompson BC, et al., 2015, 3D printing 83. Schwartz R, Malpica M, Thompson GL, et al., 2020, Cell
of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified encapsulation in gelatin bioink impairs 3D bioprinting
gellan gum substrates. Biomaterials, 67:264-273. resolution. J Mech Behav Biomed, 103:103524.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103524

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 21 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.649