Page 388 - IJB-9-2
P. 388

International Journal of Bioprinting


                                        RESEARCH ARTICLE
                                        Commercial articulated collaborative in situ 3D

                                        bioprinter for skin wound healing



                                                                                                1
                                                        1†
                                        Aleksandr A. Levin *, Pavel A. Karalkin 2,3† *, Elizaveta V. Koudan ,
                                                                           4
                                                       1
                                        Fedor S. Senatov , Vladislav A. Parfenov , Vladislav A. Lvov ,
                                                                                           1
                                                        1
                                        Stanislav V. Petrov , Frederico D. A. S. Pereira , Alexey V. Kovalev ,
                                                                                                6
                                                                               5
                                        Egor O. Osidak , Sergey P. Domogatsky , Natalya E. Manturova ,
                                                                           7
                                                                                                9
                                                     7,8
                                        Vladimir A. Kasyanov , Natalia S. Sergeeva , Vadim L. Zorin 11,12 ,
                                                           10
                                                                              2
                                        Yusef D. Khesuani , Vladimir A. Mironov 1,6
                                                       5
                                        1 Center for Biomedical Engineering, National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Moscow,
                                        Russia
                                        2 National Medical Research Radiological Center, P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Center,
                                        Moscow, Russia
                                        3 L. L. Levshin Institute of Cluster Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University,
                                        Moscow, Russia
                                        4 A. A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Material Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow,
                                        Russia
                                        5 Laboratory for Biotechnological Research “3D Bioprinting Solutions”, Moscow, Russia
                                        6 Priorov Central National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, Russia
                                        7 Imtek Ltd., Moscow, Russia
                                        8 Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Paediatric Haematology, Oncology and
            † These authors contributed equally   Immunology, Moscow, Russia
            to this work.               9 JSC Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology Institute, Moscow, Russia
            *Corresponding authors:     10 Joint Laboratory of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
            Aleksandr A. Levin
            (levin.alexandr.stankin@gmail.com)   11 Human Stem Cells Institute, Moscow, Russia
            Pavel A. Karalkin           12 SKINCELL LLC, Skolkovo, Moscow, Russia
            (pkaralkin@gmail.com)
            Citation: Levin AA, Karalkin PA,
            Koudan EV, 2023, Commercial
            articulated collaborative in situ 3D   Abstract
            bioprinter for skin wound healing.
            Int J Bioprint. 9(2): 675.
            https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.675   In situ bioprinting is one of the most clinically relevant techniques in the emerging
                                        bioprinting technology because it could be performed directly on the human body
            Received: December 1, 2022
                                        in the operating room and it does not require bioreactors for post-printing tissue
            Accepted: December 13, 2022  maturation. However, commercial  in situ bioprinters are still not available on the
            Published Online: January 31, 2023  market.  In  this study,  we  demonstrated  the benefit  of the  originally  developed
                                        first commercial articulated collaborative  in situ bioprinter for the treatment of
            Copyright: © 2023 Author(s).
            This is an Open Access article   full-thickness wounds in rat and porcine models.  We used an articulated and
            distributed under the terms of the   collaborative robotic arm from company KUKA and developed original printhead
            Creative Commons Attribution   and correspondence software enabling  in situ bioprinting on curve and moving
            License, permitting distribution,
            and reproduction in any medium,   surfaces. The results of in vitro and in vivo experiments show that in situ bioprinting of
            provided the original work is   bioink induces a strong hydrogel adhesion and enables printing on curved surfaces
            properly cited.             of wet tissues with a high level of fidelity. The in situ bioprinter was convenient to use
            Publisher’s Note: Whioce    in the operating room. Additional in vitro experiments (in vitro collagen contraction
            Publishing remains neutral with   assay and in vitro 3D angiogenesis assay) and histological analyses demonstrated
            regard to jurisdictional claims in
            published maps and institutional   that in situ bioprinting improves the quality of wound healing in rat and porcine skin
            affiliations.               wounds. The absence of interference with the normal process of wound healing and



            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        380                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.675
   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393