Page 74 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting in wound dressing and healing

82. Cheng RY, Eylert G, Gariepy J-M, et al., 2020, Handheld 94. Rees A, Powell LC, Chinga-Carrasco G, et al., 2015, 3D
instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin bioprinting of carboxymethylated-periodate oxidized
precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns. nanocellulose constructs for wound dressing applications.
Biofabrication, 12(2): 025002. BioMed Res Int, 2015: 925757.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6413 https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925757
83. Ma J, Qin C, Wu J, et al., 2021, 3D printing of strontium 95. Barrett-Catton E, Ross ML, Asuri P, 2021, Multifunctional
silicate microcylinder-containing multicellular biomaterial hydrogel nanocomposites for biomedical applications.
inks for vascularized skin regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater, Polymers, 13(6): 856.
10(16): 2100523.
96. Jones LO, Williams L, Boam T, et al., 2021, Cryogels: Recent
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100523 applications in 3D-bioprinting, injectable cryogels, drug
delivery, and wound healing. Beilstein J Org Chem, 17:
84. Ulusu Y, Dura G, Waller H, et al., 2017, Thermal stability and
rheological properties of the ‘non-stick’ Caf1 biomaterial. 2553–2569.
Biomed Mater, 12(5): 051001. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.17.171
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/aa7a89 97. Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A, 2013, Evaluation of
hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res
85. Pitton M, Fiorati A, Buscemi S, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting
of pectin-cellulose nanofibers multicomponent bioinks. A, 101A(1): 272–284.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9: 732689. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34326
86. Boffito M, Gioffredi E, Chiono V, et al., 2016, Novel 98. Devi VKA, Shyam R, Palaniappan A, et al., 2021, Self-healing
polyurethane-based thermosensitive hydrogels as drug hydrogels: Preparation, mechanism and advancement in
release and tissue engineering platforms: Design and in vitro biomedical applications. Polymers, 13(21): 3782.
characterization. Polym Int, 65(7): 756–769.
99. Miguel SP, Cabral CSD, Moreira AF, et al., 2019, Production
https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5080 and characterization of a novel asymmetric 3D printed
construct aimed for skin tissue regeneration. Colloids Surf B
87. Xia S, Weng T, Jin R, et al., 2022, Curcumin-incorporated 3D Biointerfaces, 181: 994–1003.
bioprinting gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel reduces reactive
oxygen species-induced adipose-derived stem cell apoptosis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.06.063
and improves implanting survival in diabetic wounds. Burns 100. Cai L, Liu S, Guo J, et al., 2020, Polypeptide-based self-
Trauma, 10: tkac001.
healing hydrogels: Design and biomedical applications. Acta
https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac001 Biomater, 113: 84–100.
88. de Rutte JM, Koh J, Di Carlo D, 2019, Scalable high- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.001
throughput production of modular microgels for in situ 101. Zhao H, Xu J, Zhang E, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting
assembly of microporous tissue scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater, of polythiophene materials for promoting stem cell
29(25): 1900071.
proliferation in a nutritionally deficient environment. ACS
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900071 Appl Mater Interfaces, 13(22): 25759–25770.
89. Masri S, Fauzi MB, 2021, Current insight of printability https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04967
quality improvement strategies in natural-based bioinks for 102. Chinga-Carrasco G, 2018, Potential and limitations of
skin regeneration and wound healing. Polymers, 13(7): 1011.
nanocelluloses as components in biocomposite inks for
90. Nie M, Takeuchi S, 2018, Bottom-up biofabrication using three-dimensional bioprinting and for biomedical devices.
microfluidic techniques. Biofabrication, 10(4): 044103. Biomacromolecules, 19(3): 701–711.
91. Serban MA, Skardal A, 2019, Hyaluronan chemistries for https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00053
three-dimensional matrix applications. Matrix Biol, 78: 103. Biranje SS, Sun J, Cheng L, et al., 2022, Development of
337–345.
cellulose nanofibril/casein-based 3D composite hemostasis
92. Wan W, Cai F, Huang J, et al., 2019, A skin-inspired 3D scaffold for potential wound-healing application. ACS Appl
bilayer scaffold enhances granulation tissue formation and Mater Interfaces, 14(3): 3792–3808.
anti-infection for diabetic wound healing. J Mater Chem B,
7(18):2954–2961. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c21039
104. Irmak G, Gümüşderelioğlu M, 2020, Photo-activated
93. Andriotis EG, Eleftheriadis GK, Karavasili C, et al., 2020, platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-based patient-specific bio-ink for
Development of bio-active patches based on pectin for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomed Mater, 15(6): 065010.
the treatment of ulcers and wounds using 3D-bioprinting
technology. Pharmaceutics, 12(1): 56. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ab9e46

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 66 http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.653