Page 73 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting in wound dressing and healing

58. Milojević M, Harih G, Vihar B, et al., 2021, Hybrid 3D 71. Schmitt T, Katz N, Kishore V, 2021, A feasibility study on 3D
printing of advanced hydrogel-based wound dressings with bioprinting of microfat constructs towards wound healing
tailorable properties. Pharmaceutics, 13(4): 564. applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9: 707098
59. Hartwell R, Chan B, Elliott K, et al., 2016, Polyvinyl alcohol- 72. Lee V, Singh G, Trasatti JP, et al., 2014, Design and fabrication
graft-polyethylene glycol hydrogels improve utility and of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng
biofunctionality of injectable collagen biomaterials. Biomed Part C Methods, 20(6): 473–484.
Mater, 11(3): 035013.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0335
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/3/035013
73. Grijalvo S, Nieto-Díaz M, Maza RM, et al., 2019, Alginate
60. Yegappan R, Selvaprithiviraj V, Amirthalingam S, et al., hydrogels as scaffolds and delivery systems to repair the
2018, Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue damaged spinal cord. Biotechnol J, 14(12): 1900275.
engineering and wound healing. Carbohydr Polym, 198:
385–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201900275
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.086 74. Azadmanesh F, Pourmadadi M, Zavar Reza J, et al., 2021,
Synthesis of a novel nanocomposite containing chitosan
61. Qamar SA, Junaid M, Riasat A, et al., 2022, Carrageenan- as a three-dimensional printed wound dressing technique:
based hybrids with biopolymers and nano-structured Emphasis on gene expression. Biotechnol Prog, 37(4): e3132.
materials for biomimetic applications. Starch - Stärke,
n/a(n/a): 2200018. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.3132
https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202200018 75. Masri S, Zawani M, Zulkiflee I, et al., 2022, Cellular
interaction of human skin cells towards natural bioink
62. Xu J, Liu Y, Hsu S, 2019, Hydrogels based on Schiff base via 3D-bioprinting technologies for chronic wound:
linkages for biomedical applications. Molecules, 24(16):3005. A comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci, 23(1): 476.
63. Graham S, Marina PF, Blencowe A, 2019, Thermoresponsive 76. Ho J, Yue D, Cheema U, et al., 2022, Innovations in stem cell
polysaccharides and their thermoreversible physical therapy for diabetic wound healing. Adv Wound Care, in-press.
hydrogel networks. Carbohydr Polym, 207: 143–159.
https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0104
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.053
77. Maharajan N, Cho GW, Jang CH, 2020, Application
64. Rastin H, Ramezanpour M, Hassan K, et al., 2021, 3D of mesenchymal stem cell for tympanic membrane
bioprinting of a cell-laden antibacterial polysaccharide
hydrogel composite. Carbohydr Polym, 264: 117989. regeneration by tissue engineering approach. Int J Pediatr
Otorhinolaryngol, 133: 109969.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117989
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.109969
65. Nowak JA, Polak L, Pasolli HA, et al., 2008, Hair follicle stem
cells are specified and function in early skin morphogenesis. 78. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck C-T, et al., 2013, Tissue engineered
Cell Stem Cell, 3(1): 33–43. skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form
skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamber in mice.
66. Min D, Lee W, Bae I, et al., 2018, Bioprinting of biomimetic PLoS One, 8(3): e57741.
skin containing melanocytes. Exp Dermatol, 27(5): 453–459.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057741
67. Shi L, Xiong L, Hu Y, et al., 2018, Three-dimensional printing
alginate/gelatin scaffolds as dermal substitutes for skin tissue 79. Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SV, et al., 2019, In situ
engineering. Polym Eng Sci, 58(10): 1782–1790. bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound
healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci
https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24779 Rep, 9(1): 1856.
68. Won J-Y, Lee M-H, Kim M-J, et al., 2019, A potential dermal https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w
substitute using decellularized dermis extracellular matrix
derived bio-ink. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 47(1): 80. Zhao W, Xu T, 2020, Preliminary engineering for in situ in
644–649. vivo bioprinting: A novel micro bioprinting platform for in
situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site. Biofabrication,
69. Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, et al., 2018, Proof-of-concept: 12(4): 045020.
3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs.
Biofabrication, 10(2): 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba4ff
70. Huang S, Yao B, Xie J, et al., 2016, 3D bioprinted extracellular 81. O’Connell CD, Di Bella C, Thompson F, et al., 2016,
matrix mimics facilitate directed differentiation of epithelial Development of the biopen: A handheld device for surgical
progenitors for sweat gland regeneration. Acta Biomater, 32: printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site.
170–177. Biofabrication, 8(1): 015019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.039 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015019

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 65 http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.653