Page 75 - IJB-9-2

International Journal of Bioprinting Bioprinting in wound dressing and healing

105. Reddy KLV, Murugan D, Mullick M, et al., 2020, Recent 116. Li J, Chi J, Liu J, et al., 2017, 3D printed gelatin-alginate
approaches for angiogenesis in search of successful tissue bioactive scaffolds combined with mice bone marrow
engineering and regeneration. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther, mesenchymal stem cells: A biocompatibility study. Int J Clin
15(2): 111–134. Exp Pathol, 10(6): 6299–6307.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888X14666191104151928 117. López-Iglesias C, Quílez C, Barros J, et al., 2020, Lidocaine-
loaded solid lipid microparticles (SLMPs) produced
106. Deng Y, Shavandi A, Okoro OV, et al., 2021, Alginate
modification via click chemistry for biomedical applications. from gas-saturated solutions for wound applications.
Carbohydr Polym, 270: 118360. Pharmaceutics, 12(9): 870.
118. Das AK, Gavel PK, 2020, Low molecular weight self-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118360
assembling peptide-based materials for cell culture,
107. Wang M, Li H, Yang Y, et al., 2021, A 3D-bioprinted antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, wound healing,
scaffold with doxycycline-controlled BMP2-expressing cells anticancer, drug delivery, bioimaging and 3D bioprinting
for inducing bone regeneration and inhibiting bacterial applications. Soft Matter, 16(44): 10065–10095.
infection. Bioact Mater, 6(5): 1318–1329.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SM01136C
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.022
119. Tan CT, Liang K, Ngo ZH, et al., 2020, Application of 3D
108. Bom S, Martins AM, Ribeiro HM, et al., 2021, Diving into bioprinting technologies to the management and treatment
3D (bio)printing: A revolutionary tool to customize the of diabetic foot ulcers. Biomedicines, 8(10): 441.
production of drug and cell-based systems for skin delivery.
Int J Pharm, 605: 120794. 120. Jorgensen AM, Varkey M, Gorkun A, et al., 2020, Bioprinted
skin recapitulates normal collagen remodeling in full-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120794 thickness wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26(9–10): 512–526.
109. Datta S, Sarkar R, Vyas V, et al., 2018, Alginate-honey https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0319
bioinks with improved cell responses for applications as
bioprinted tissue engineered constructs. J Mater Res, 33(14): 121. Ishack S, Khachemoune A, 2022, Future prospects in
2029–2039. 3-dimensional (3D) technology and Mohs micrographic
surgery. J Dermatol Treat, 33(6): 2810–2812.
https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.202
https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2022.2080171
110. McKay TB, Hutcheon AEK, Guo X, et al., 2020, Modeling the
cornea in 3-dimensions: Current and future perspectives. 122. Wang Q, Xia Q, Wu Y, et al., 2015, 3D-printed atsttrin-
Exp Eye Res, 197: 108127. incorporated alginate/hydroxyapatite scaffold promotes
bone defect regeneration with TNF/TNFR signaling
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108127 involvement. Adv Healthc Mater, 4(11): 1701–1708.
111. Si H, Xing T, Ding Y, et al., 2019, 3D bioprinting of the sustained https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500211
drug release wound dressing with double-crosslinked 123. Kuo C-Y, Eranki A, Placone JK, et al., 2016, Development of
hyaluronic-acid-based hydrogels. Polymers, 11(10): 1584.
a 3D printed, bioengineered placenta model to evaluate the
112. Kostenko A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ, 2022, Alginate in role of trophoblast migration in preeclampsia. ACS Biomater
corneal tissue engineering. Biomed Mater, 17: 022004. Sci Eng, 2(10): 1817–1826.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac4d7b https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00031
113. Miranda-Nieves D, Chaikof EL, 2017, Collagen and elastin 124. Moakes RJA, Senior JJ, Robinson TE, et al., 2021, A
biomaterials for the fabrication of engineered living tissues. suspended layer additive manufacturing approach to the
ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 3(5): 694–711. bioprinting of tri-layered skin equivalents. APL Bioeng, 5(4):
046103.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00250
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061361
114. Chouhan D, Dey N, Bhardwaj N, et al., 2019, Emerging
and innovative approaches for wound healing and skin 125. Antezana PE, Municoy S, Álvarez-Echazú MI, et al.,
regeneration: Current status and advances. Biomaterials, 2022, The 3D bioprinted scaffolds for wound healing.
216: 119267. Pharmaceutics, 14(2): 464.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119267 126. Kotlarz M, Ferreira AM, Gentile P, et al., 2022, Droplet-
based bioprinting enables the fabrication of cell–hydrogel–
115. Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for skin microfibre composite tissue precursors. Bio-Des Manuf, 5:
tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue 512–528.
Eng, 12: 20417314211028576.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00192-5
https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314211028574

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023) 67 http://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.653