Page 44 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Comparison of different 3D printing technologies

(POCTEP) 2014–2020 program, project number 0633_ 5. Zhu Y, Joralmon D, Shan W, et al., 2021, 3D printing
BIOIMPACE_4_A. biomimetic materials and structures for biomedical
applications. Biodes Manuf, 4(2):405–428.
Funding https://doi.org/10.1007/S42242-020-00117-0
This research was financed by the European Regional 6. Ma PX, 2008, Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering.
Development Fund (ERDF) within the framework of Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 60(2):184.
the Interreg VA Spain – Portugal (POCTEP) 2014–2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDR.2007.08.041
program, project number 0633_BIOIMPACE_4_A.
7. Ghorbani F, Li D, Zhong Z, et al., 2021, Bioprinting a cell-
laden matrix for bone regeneration: A focused review. J Appl
Conflict of interest Polym Sci, 138(8):49888.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.49888
Author contributions 8. Rodríguez JM, Rodríguez JM, Sánchez R, et al., 2021,
Development of a device for the control of variables in the
Investigation: Jesús Manuel Rodríguez Rego, Laura bioprinting of hydrogels. 6–9.
Mendoza Cerezo, Antonio Macías García, 9. Lauzurica S, Rocío S, Simón C, 2020, Lucía González Yeguas.
Methodology, Writing-original draft [Online]. Available.
Methodology: Jesús Manuel Rodríguez Rego, Laura https://oa.upm.es/65708/
Mendoza Cerezo
Writing – original draft: Jesús Manuel Rodríguez Rego, 10. Vijayavenkataraman S, Yan WC, Lu WF, et al., 2018, 3D
bioprinting of tissues and organs for regenerative medicine.
Laura Mendoza Cerezo, Antonio Macías García Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 132:296–332.
Writing – review & editing: Antonio Macías García, Juan
Pablo Carrasco Amador https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDR.2018.07.004
Funding acquisition: Alfonso Carlos Marcos Romero 11. Noohi P, Mahdavi SS, Abdekhodaie MJ, et al., 2023,
Project administration: Alfonso Carlos Marcos Romero Photoreactive hydrogels based on type I collagen extracted
Supervision: Alfonso Carlos Marcos Romero from different sources as scaffolds for tissue engineering
applications: A comparative study. Materialia (Oxf),
Ethics approval and consent to participate 27:101651.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTLA.2022.101651
12. Nguyen AK, Goering PL, Elespuru RK, et al., 2020, The
Consent for publication photoinitiator lithium phenyl (2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)
phosphinate with exposure to 405 nm light is cytotoxic to
Not applicable. mammalian cells but not mutagenic in bacterial reverse
mutation assays. Polymers (Basel), 12(7):1–13.
Availability of data
https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12071489
Not applicable.
13. Huang J, Chen L, Gu Z, et al., 2019, Red jujube-incorporated
gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels with anti-oxidation
References and immunoregulation activity for wound healing. J Biomed
Nanotechnol, 15:1357–1370.
1. Derby B, 2012, Printing and prototyping of tissues and
scaffolds. Science (1979), 338(6109):921–926. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbn.2019.2815
https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1226340 14. Komez A, Baran ET, Erdem U, et al., 2016, Construction of
a patterned hydrogel-fibrous mat bilayer structure to mimic
2. Robson AJ, 2005, Complex evolutionary systems and the choroid and Bruch’s membrane layers of retina. J Biomed
Red Queen. Econ J, 115(504):211–224. Mater Res A, 104( 9):2166–2177.
https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0297.2005.01002.X https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.A.35756
3. Yang Y, Song X, li X, et al., 2018, Recent progress in biomimetic 15. Griffanti G, Nazhat SN, 2020, Dense fibrillar collagen-based
additive manufacturing technology: From materials to hydrogels as functional osteoid-mimicking scaffolds. Int
functional structures. Adv Mater, 30(36):1706539. Mater Rev, 65(8):502–521.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.201706539 https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2020.1735828
4. López RA, 2018, Impresión 3D y sus aplicaciones en Medicina. 16. Zhang Q, Tang Q, Yang Y, et al., 2021, Wound dressing
[Online]. Available: www.timetoast.com/timelines/linea-del- gel with resisted bacterial penetration and enhanced

Volume 9 Issue3 (2023) 36 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.680