Page 70 - IJB-9-3
P. 70

International Journal of Bioprinting                    Peritoneal scaffolds for the peritoneal adhesion prevention



            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Krielen P, Stommel MWJ, Pargmae P, et al., 2020, Adhesion-
                                                                  related readmissions after open and laparoscopic surgery: A
            None.                                                 retrospective cohort study (SCAR update). Lancet (British
                                                                  edition), 395(10217):33–41.
            Funding
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32636-4
            This study was supported by the National Natural Science   5.   Wiseman DM, 2008, Disorders of adhesions or adhesion-
            Foundation of China (82270595), Key Research and      related disorder: Monolithic entities or part of something
            Development Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2022823),   bigger--CAPPS? Semin Reprod Med, 26(4):356–368.
            Postdoctoral Innovation Talents Support  Program
            (BX20220393), and Postgraduate Research & Practice    https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082394
            Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJCX22_0031).  6.   Tang J, Xiang Z,  Bernards MT,  et al., 2020, Peritoneal
                                                                  adhesions: Occurrence, prevention  and  experimental
            Conflict of interest                                  models. Acta Biomater, 116:84–104.

            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.036
                                                               7.   Trochsler M, Maddern GJ, 2014, Adhesion barriers
            Author contributions                                  for abdominal surgery: A sticky problem.  Lancet,
                                                                  383(9911):8–10.
            Conceptualization: Xiuwen Wu, Huajian Ren
            Formal analysis: Canwen Chen, Ze Li                   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62002-4
            Investigation: Jianan Ren, Huajian Ren             8.   Ten BR, Stommel M, Strik C, et al., 2014, Benefits and harms
            Methodology: Ziyan Xu, Kang Chen, Sicheng Li          of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: A systematic
            Writing – original draft: Sicheng Li, Ye Liu          review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 383(9911):48–59.
            Writing – review & editing: Jinjian Huang, Sicheng Li  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6

            Ethics approval and consent to participate         9.   Carmichael SP, Shin J, Vaughan JW, et al., 2022, Regenerative
                                                                  medicine therapies for prevention of abdominal adhesions:
            The animal study was approved by the local animal ethics   A scoping review. J Surg Res, 275:252–264.
            committee (approval number: 2022DZGKJDWLS-0069).      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.005

            Consent for publication                            10.  Ito T, Shintani Y, Fields L, et al., 2021, Cell barrier function
                                                                  of resident peritoneal macrophages in post-operative
            Not applicable.                                       adhesions. Nat Commun, 12(1):2232.

            Availability of data                                  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22536-y.
                                                               11.  Inagaki NF, Inagaki FF, Kokudo N, et al., 2015, Use of mouse
            All data used in this work are presented in the paper and/  liver mesothelial cells to prevent postoperative adhesion and
            or the Supplementary File.                            promote liver regeneration after hepatectomy.  J Hepatol,
                                                                  62(5):1141–1147.
            References                                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.010

            1.   Molegraaf MJ, Torensma B, Lange CP, et al., 2017, Twelve-  12.  van Baal JO, Van de Vijver KK, Nieuwland R, et al., 2017, The
               year outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients   histophysiology and pathophysiology of the peritoneum.
               with chronic abdominal pain: A randomized clinical trial.   Tissue Cell, 49(1):95–105.
               Surgery, 161(2):415–421.                           https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2016.11.004
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.014
                                                               13.  Mutsaers SE, Prele CM, Pengelly S, et al., 2016, Mesothelial
            2.   Herrick SE, Allen JE, 2021, Surgical adhesions: A sticky   cells and peritoneal homeostasis.  Fertil Steril, 106(5):
               macrophage problem. Science, 371(6533):993–994.    1018–1024.
               https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5416            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.005
            3.   Ten BR, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ,  et al., 2013, Burden of   14.  Capobianco A, Cottone L, Monno A,  et al., 2017, The
               adhesions in  abdominal  and pelvic  surgery:  Systematic   peritoneum: Healing, immunity, and diseases.  J Pathol,
               review and met-analysis. BMJ, 347(oct03 1):f5588.  243(2):137–147.
               https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5588                  https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4942




            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                         62                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.682
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75