Page 212 - IJB-9-4
P. 212

International Journal of Bioprinting                    b-Ti21S TPMS FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion



































            Figure 18. Finite element simulation of the complete TPMS-FGPS 2.5. (a) The contour mesh of the as-manufactured samples. (b) Loading condition
            resembling the experimental condition, i.e., a fixed constraint on the bottom surface of the specimen and a fixed displacement equal to 0.1 mm in the
            vertical direction on the top surface. (c) Results of the simulation analysis.

                                                               with unit cell sizes of 2.5 and 4.0 mm, and relative density
                                                               gradients of 0.17, 0.34, 0.50, 0.66, and 0.83. Quasi-static
                                                               and cyclic compression tests were carried out to evaluate
                                                               E quasi-elastic , yield stress and E cyclic . Homogenization analysis
                                                               and simple lumped model were conducted, and the
                                                               obtained results were compared with the experimental
                                                               values.  FEA  further  explained  the  discrepancy  observed
                                                               between experimental simulated values in the case
                                                               of TPMS-FGPS 4.0. The main results of the study are
                                                               summarized as follows.

                                                                 (i)  2D metrological characterization by SEM highlights
                                                                    an undersizing of both ligament and pore size with a
                                                                    maximum variation of 16% (TPMS-FGPS 2.5) and 9%
                                                                    (TPMS-FGPS 4.0) and of 66% (TPMS-FGPS 2.5) and
                                                                    64% (TPMS-FGPS 4.0), respectively. The undersizing
                                                                    of the pore and ligament with respect to the CAD can
            Figure 19. Gibson–Ashby fitting equation for TPMS with 2.5 mm of unit   be attributed to an excess of material, a higher amount
            cell size.                                              of unmelted powder in the upper part of the pores,
                                                                    and variations in the diameter of the ligament.
            obtain C  equal to 0.94 and n  equal to 2.13, as found by
                                    1
                   1
            other authors [36,73] . The exponential constants are very close    (ii)  3D  metrological  characterization  by  X-ray  and
            to the pure bending-dominated behavior, as shown by the   m-CT imaging shows an undersizing of both the pore
            comparison with the red curve in Figure 19.             size and ligament thickness, which is lower than 5%
                                                                    in TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and TPMS-FGPS 4.0, confirming
            4. Conclusion                                           the excellent printability of these structures.

            2D and 3D metrological characterizations  were      (iii)  The 3D metrological characterization by means
            performed  on  two  different  3D-printed  TPMS-FGPSs   of m-CT imaging permits a more holistic evaluation


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        204                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.729
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217