Page 208 - IJB-9-4
P. 208

International Journal of Bioprinting                    b-Ti21S TPMS FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion





























                      Figure 14. Comparison between 2D and 3D characterizations in the case of (a) TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and (b) TPMS-FGPS 4.0.
            manufactured thickness values were used to calculate   A more accurate analysis was obtained, considering the
            the homogenized properties for each cell dimension and   as-manufactured ligament thickness (E hom ).
                                                                                              real
            density  level  using  the  software  nTopology  (nTopology
            Inc., USA). Since the design of the TPMS unit cell size   To define the overall elastic modulus of both TPMS-
            was  done  by  means  of  the  implicit  Equation  V,  the   FGPSs, the stiffness values reported in Table 8 were input
            calculation of the real level constant “t” by means of the as-  into Equation III, and the obtained numerical values are
            manufactured ligament thickness is necessary. Equations   summarized in Table 9 along with the experimental E cyclic .
            XIII and XIV, obtained by CAD data, were used to      The theoretical values obtained by means of the
            calculate the corresponding level constant “t” in the case   homogenization method and Equation III lead to a
            of as-manufactured ligament thickness of TPMS-FGPS 2.5   discrepancy from the experimental values of around 10% and
            and TPMS-FGPS 4.0, respectively.                   −8% considering the as-designed and the as-manufactured
               t  = -0.7572 + 0.1842l  + 0.4998l  - 0.1365l       ligament thickness of TPMS-FGPS 2.5. Good correlation
                                                   3
                                          2
               2.5
                                 t
                                                   t
                                         t
                                 Adj R  = 0.99982X     XIII    in both conditions, namely using CAD and as-printed
                                      2
                                                               values, was resulted owing to the small geometric deviation
               t  = -1.1454 - 0.8071l  + 1.0483l  - 0.1723l
                                                   3
                                          2
               4.0                t       t        t           from as-manufactured sample and CAD shown through
                                 Adj R  = 0.99995      XIV     3D metrological characterization. In addition, a result
                                      2
               The results are summarized in  Table 7. Lower level   close to the experimental values was obtained, highlighting
            constants  were  achieved  in  the  case  of  as-manufactured   the promising ability of the homogenization simulation to
            samples due to the undersizing effect caused by the 3D   reduce the number of experimental trials and consequently
            printing process. Finite element analysis was performed   the time consumption to evaluate the elastic modulus of
            to compute the homogenized material properties [64,65] .   a designed and printed cellular structure. Different results
            Table 8 shows the elastic modulus obtained by the   were observed in the case of TPMS-FGPS 4 where a large
            homogenization in the case of as-designed (E hom ) and as-  significant  undersizing (−61%  and −79%) was  obtained,
                                                 nom
                          hom
            manufactured (E real )  samples.  Elastic  modulus  values  of   considering both the as-designed and as-manufactured
            the different relative density levels in the case of 2.5 mm   ligament thickness with respect to the experimental results.
            and 4.0 mm unit cell size are obtained as demonstrated by   The homogenization method relies on the hypothesis of
            the Gibson–Ashby equation, i.e., Equation I. Therefore,   an infinite cell repetition in space. In the TPMS 4.0, the
            no influence of the unit cell size was detected for the same   specimen has a limited number of unit cells: 3 × 3 unit cells
            relative density level. In other words, the elastic modulus   on the normal area with respect to the load, meaning along
            of a porous structure is affected by the type of cellular   x and  y directions. This deeply influences the degree of
            structure, the bulk material, and the relative density. As   accuracy the homogenized model is able to achieve, since
            shown in Equation I, an increased relative density leads to   the effect given by the edge effect is non-negligible [64,69,70] .
            an increased elastic modulus.                      In order to highlight the importance of the number of unit
            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        200                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.729
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213