Page 204 - IJB-9-4
P. 204

International Journal of Bioprinting                    b-Ti21S TPMS FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion


















































            Figure 9. Detail of excess of material on pore surfaces for (a) TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and (b) TPMS-FGPS 4.0. Detail of the unmelted powder and of surface
            irregularity in the (c) upper and (d) lower parts of the pore.


            ligament thickness obtained by comparing CAD with as-  Figure 14 shows the percentage variation to CAD
            manufactured samples in the different relative density   in the case of 2D (SEM) and 3D (m-CT) metrological
            levels for both TPMS-FGPSs. Percentage variations of   investigations. In both cases, an undersizing effect was
            the as-manufactured sample to CAD underline a small   detected in pore size and ligament thickness. Nevertheless,
            undersizing of  the  ligament  thickness  and  of  the  pore   closer results were obtained in the case of the 3D
            size after the printing. A maximum undersizing of the   characterization which gives more precise results thanks to
            pore size of 5% and 2% and of the ligament of 4% and   the same method of analysis used in the as-designed and
            3% was detected in TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and TPMS-FGPS     as-manufactured sample characterization (wall thickness
            4.0, respectively, confirming the excellent overall quality   method) and to the characterization of the entire volume.
            of the AM process. To further justify the undersizing of   This did not occur in the case of 2D investigations, where
            both pore and ligament, overlap of as-designed (black) and   only a portion of the sample was characterized.
            as-manufactured (gray) samples in a simplified 2D view is
            shown in Figure 13. Surface irregularity, unmelted powder,   3.2. Microstructural characterization
            and excess of material in the upper part of the pore lead to   SEM micrograph details of the TPMS-FGPS  2.5 and
            a lower pore size estimation with wall thickness method   TPMS-FGPS 4 are shown in Figure 15. Low magnification
            and to an overall reduced ligament thickness, as shown in   micrographs (Figure 15a for TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and
            Figure 13a and  b for TPMS-FGPS 2.5 and TPMS-FGPS   Figure 15c for TPMS-FGPS 4.0) highlight the achievement
            4.0, respectively.                                 of a near fully dense material and a columnar  b grain


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        196                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.729
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209