Page 215 - IJB-9-4
P. 215

International Journal of Bioprinting                    b-Ti21S TPMS FGPs produced by laser powder bed fusion



            32.  Yánez A, Cuadrado A, Martel O, et al., 2018, Gyroid porous   43.  Yadroitsava I, du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I, 2019, Bone
               titanium structures: A versatile solution to be used as scaffolds   regeneration on implants of titanium alloys produced by
               in bone defect reconstruction. Mater Des, 140:21–29.  laser powder bed fusion: A review, in Titanium for Consumer
                                                                  Applications: Real World Use of Titanium, 197–233.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.050
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815820-3.00016-2
            33.  Jin Y, Kong H, Zhou X,  et  al., 2020, Design and
               characterization of sheet-based gyroid porous structures   44.  Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, et al., 1980, The optimum
               with bioinspired functional gradients. Materials (Basel), 13:   pore size for the fixation of porous surfaced metal implants by
               108971.                                            the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 150:263–270.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173844                 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198007000-00045
            34.  Yuan L, Ding S, Wen C, 2019, Additive manufacturing   45.  Wang Z, Zhang M, Liu Z, et al., 2022, Biomimetic design
               technology for porous metal implant applications and triple   strategy of complex porous structure based on 3D printing
               minimal surface structures: A review. Bioact Mater, 4:56–70.  Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds for enhanced osseointegration.  Mater
                                                                  Des, 218:110721.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.12.003
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110721
            35.  Soro N, Saintier N, Merzeau J, et al., 2021, Quasi-static and
               fatigue properties of graded Ti–6Al–4V lattices produced by   46.  Taniguchi N, Fujibayashi S, Takemoto M,  et al., 2016,
               laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Addit Manuf, 37:101653.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium
                                                                  implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101653        experiment. Mater Sci Eng C, 59:690–701.
            36.  Yang L, Yan C, Han C,  et al., 2018, Mechanical response   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
               of a triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures
               manufactured by selective laser melting.  Int J Mech Sci,   47.  Mahmoud D, Elbestawi MA, 2019, Selective laser melting
               148:149–157.                                       of porosity graded lattice structures for bone implants. Int J
                                                                  Adv Manuf Technol, 100:2915–2927.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.08.039
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2886-9
            37.  Shi J, Zhu L, Li L,  et al., 2018, A TPMS-based method
               for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue   48.  Surmeneva MA, Surmenev RA, Chudinova EA, et al., 2017,
               engineering. Sci Rep, 8:7395.                      Fabrication of multiple-layered gradient cellular metal
                                                                  scaffold via electron beam melting for segmental bone
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25750-9         reconstruction. Mater Des, 133:195–204.
            38.  Zadpoor AA, 2019, Mechanical performance of additively   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.059
               manufactured meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomater, 85:41–59.
                                                               49.  Tüzemen MÇ, Salamcı E, Ünal R, 2022, Additive
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.038       manufacturing design approach to strut-based functionally
                                                                  graded porous structures for personalized implants. J Manuf
            39.  Kapfer SC, Hyde ST, Mecke K, et al., 2011, Minimal surface   Process, 84:1526–1540.
               scaffold designs for tissue engineering.  Biomaterials,
               32:6875–6882.                                      https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2022.10.045
               https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2011.06.012  50.  Tüzemen MÇ, Salamcı E, Ünal R, 2022, Investigation of
                                                                  the relationship between flexural modulus of elasticity and
            40.  Zhao S, Li SJ, Wang SG,  et al., 2018, Compressive and   functionally graded porous structures manufactured by
               fatigue behavior of functionally graded Ti-6Al-4V meshes   AM. Mater Today Commun, 31:103592.
               fabricated by electron beam melting. Acta Mater, 150:1–15.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103592
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.060
                                                               51.  Murat Dursun A, Çağrı Tüzemen M, Salamci E,  et al.,
            41.  Dong Z, Zhao X, 2021, Application of TPMS structure in   2022, Investigation of compatibility between design and
               bone regeneration. Eng Regen, 2:154–162.           additively manufactured parts of functionally graded porous
               https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGREG.2021.09.004       structures. J Polytech, 25:1069–1082.
            42.  Liu F, Ran Q, Zhao M, et al., 2020, Additively manufactured   https://doi.org/10.2339/POLITEKNIK.891080
               continuous cell-size gradient porous scaffolds: Pore   52.  Kelly CN, Wang T, Crowley J, et al., 2021, High-strength,
               characteristics, mechanical properties and biological   porous additively manufactured implants with optimized
               responses in vitro. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 13:2589.  mechanical osseointegration. Biomaterials, 279:121206.
               https://doi.org/10.3390/MA13112589                 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2021.121206




            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        207                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.729
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220