Page 233 - IJB-9-4
P. 233

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Agar production residue for 3D printing



            carried out from 0.1 to 50 s . This shear sweep data were   The pores are considered perfect circles when Cr value
                                  −1
            fitted to Cross model, which describes pseudoplastic flow   is 1; meanwhile, perfect square pores present π/4Cr values.
            with asymptotic viscosities at zero and infinite shear rates.   Moreover, a perfect lattice has a Pr value of 1.
            Cross model  is represented by Equation I:
                      [15]
                                                               2.6. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
                         η − η                                 Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of agar production
               ηγ  ()= η +  0  ∞                       (I)
                     ∞        m
                        1 +( λγ )                             residue and SPI-based 3D-printed products were performed
            where  η is apparent viscosity,  η  is the infinite shear   by a Platinum-ATR Alpha II FTIR spectrometer (Bruker). A
                                       ∞
                                                                                                          −1
            viscosity, η  is the zero shear viscosity, λ is characteristic   total of 32 scans were performed at a resolution of 4 cm  in
                     0
                                                                                                 −1
            time, γ˙ is shear rate, and  m is dimensionless cross rate   the wavenumber range from 800 to 4000 cm .
            constant, which is related to the slope.           2.7. Swelling and degradation measurements
               Finally, three-interval thixotropy test was employed   In order to calculate the swelling capacity of the 3D-printed
            to determine the hydrogel recovery. In this sense, it was   products, different preweighed (w ) samples were
                                                                                              p
            considered  the  shear  rate  at  the  syringe  wall,  γ˙ ,  which   immersed into 40 mL of PBS at 37°C and then weighed
                                                   w
            can  be  corrected  using  the  Weissenberg–Rabinowitsch–  again at various time points (w ) until constant values were
                                                                                       t
            Mooney equation :                                  obtained. The swelling (S) was calculated by Equation V:
                          [16]
                                                       (II)       S =  w − w p  ⋅100                      (V)
                                                                      t
                                                                       w
                                                                        p
            where Q is the volume flow rate, r is the radius of the tip,   Additionally,  samples  were  removed  after  24  h,  dried  in
            and n is the flow index calculated using the Cross model   the oven at 105°C for 24 h, and weighed (w ). In order
                                                                                                   1d
            fitting, with -m = n – 1 .                         to  determine  the  3D-printed  product  degradation,
                              [17]
            2.4. 3D printing                                   Equation VI was used:
            First, a cylinder with dimensions of 20 mm in diameter   w −  w
            and 20 mm in height was designed employing a computer-  D =  p  d 1  ⋅100                    (VI)
            aided design (CAD) software (Solid Edge, Siemens,           w p
            Germany) and Ultimaker Cura 4.13.1 (Ultimaker BV, the
            Netherlands) as slicer. Then, hydrogels were 3D-printed by   2.8. Thermo-gravimetric analysis
            a domoBIO 2A bioprinter (Domotek, Gipuzkoa, Spain),   Thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed in a
            employing a syringe extruder, a refrigerated platform   Mettler Toledo TGA SDTA 851 equipment (Mettler Toledo
            and a Teflon sheet substrate. The following processing   S.A.E.) under inert atmosphere conditions (10 mL N /min)
                                                                                                        2
            parameters  were  employed:  nozzle  size,  14  G;  printing   to avoid thermo-oxidative reactions. The samples were
            temperature, 30°C; build plate temperature, 25°C; print   heated from 25°C to 800°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min.
            speed, 10 mm/s; infill density, 50%; flow, 160%; initial layer   2.9. Scanning electron microscopy
            flow, 190%; and layer height, 0.5 mm.              The morphology of the 3D-printed products was

            2.5. Printability test                             visualized  using an  S-4800  field  emission  scanning
            The shape fidelity assessment was carried out by analyzing   electron microscope (SEM; Hitachi High-Technologies
            the images of the 3D-printed products. ImageJ software   Corporation). Prior to observation, samples were mounted
            was used to determine the perimeter and area of pores.   on  a  metal  stub  with  double-sided adhesive  tape  and
            The quality of the 3D-printed product was determined   coated under vacuum with gold (JFC-1100) in an argon
            using shape descriptor parameters: circularity (Cr) and   atmosphere. The 3D-printed products were analyzed
            printability (Pr) . Circularity and printability are defined   employing an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
                        [18]
            according to Equations III and IV:                 2.10. X-ray diffraction
                   4π A                                        X-ray diffraction (XRD) study was carried out using a
              Cr =                                    (III)    diffraction unit (PANalyticXpert PRO). The radiation was
                    P 2                                        generated from a  CuK   (λ  =  1.5418 Å)  source  (40 mA,
                                                                                  α
                    π                                          40 kV). Data were collected from 2θ values from 2º to 50º,
               Pr =                                   (IV)
                   4Cr                                         where θ is the incidence angle of the X-ray beam on the
            where A is the pore area and P is the pore perimeter.  3D-printed products.




            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        225                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.731
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238