Page 237 - IJB-9-4
P. 237

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Agar production residue for 3D printing

































                                    Figure 5. SEM images of 3D-printed products with different residue contents.

            are three main weight loss steps for all the samples,
            regardless of the cellulose content. The first one, which
            occurs at temperatures lower than 100°C, is associated to
            water evaporation  and its value was lower than 10%.
                           [34]
            The second weight loss step appeared around 200°C
            and it is mainly related to the evaporation of glycerol ,
                                                        [35]
            but also to the initial cellulose depolymerization  and
                                                     [36]
            to the unstable chemical bond breaks in soy protein .
                                                        [37]
            The  last  step  appeared  around  310°C  and  corresponds
            to cellulose , SPI , and gelatin  decomposition. As
                                        [38]
                           [37]
                     [36]
            expected, there was no peak around 400°C corresponding
            to the degradation of lignin. Considering thermal
            analysis, it  can be said  that 3D-printed products were
            endowed with thermal stability, which broadens their
            applicability.
            3.3. Morphology and mechanical properties
            In order to study the morphology of 3D-printed products,   Figure 6. XRD patterns of 3D-printed products with different residue
            SEM images were analyzed (Figure 5). All samples   contents.
            featured a porous structure with randomly distributed                     [39-41]
            pores of varying sizes and shapes. The microstructure was   and the cellulose structure  . Interactions between
            more loosened when cellulose was incorporated, but no   biopolymers decreased protein–protein intramolecular
            specific trend was found with increasing cellulose content.   interactions, leading to more  amorphous  structures,  as
            It is worth noting that cellulose-containing 3D-printed   evidenced in SPI8C, which have the highest cellulose
            products did not show aggregates, indicating that cellulose   content employed in this work.
            was well-distributed. This was corroborated by XRD    Regarding mechanical properties, it is worth noting
            patterns (Figure 6), which exhibited two broad peaks at   that 3D-printed products did not display ruptures, even
            9° and 20°. The first peak was associated to the α-helix   at a compression strain of 50%. Both elastic modulus
            of soy protein as well as to the triple-helix of gelatin. The   (Figure  7A)  and force  (Figure 7B)  increased  with the
            second peak was attributed to the β-sheet structure of the   increase of cellulose content (p > 0.05), showing suitable
            soy protein, the single left-handed helix chain of gelatin,   values for applications such as wound healing .
                                                                                                           [42]

            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        229                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.731
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242