Page 240 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

7. Sridhar R, Lakshminarayanan R, Madhaiyan K, et al., 18. Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Puster U, et al., 2016,
2015, Electrosprayed nanoparticles and electrospun Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor
nanofibers based on natural materials: Applications in tissue to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv
regeneration, drug delivery and pharmaceuticals. Chem Soc Healthc Mater, 5(3): 326–333.
Rev, 44(3): 790–814.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500677
https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00226a
19. Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang Y , et al., 2018, Bioinks
8. Chen W, Xu Y, Li Y, et al., 2020, 3D printing electrospinning for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomater Sci, 6(5):
fiber-reinforced decellularized extracellular matrix for 915–946.
cartilage regeneration. Chem Eng J, 382: 122986.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00765e
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122986
20. Griffanti G, Rezabeigi E, Li J, et al., 2019, Rapid biofabrication
9. Lai Y, Li Y, Cao H, et al., 2019, Osteogenic magnesium of printable dense collagen bioinks of tunable properties.
incorporated into PLGA/TCP porous scaffold by 3D Adv Funct Mater, 30(4): 1903874.
printing for repairing challenging bone defect. Biomaterials,
197: 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903874
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013 21. Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, et al., 2017, Development
of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal
10. Golzar H, Mohammadrezaei D, Yadegari A, et al., 2020, application. Biofabrication, 9(3): 034103.
Incorporation of functionalized reduced graphene oxide/
magnesium nanohybrid to enhance the osteoinductivity https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa7e96
capability of 3D printed calcium phosphate-based scaffolds. 22. Rastin H, Ormsby RT, Atkins GJ, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinting
Compos Part B Eng, 185: 107749. of methylcellulose/gelatin-methacryloyl (MC/GelMA)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107749 bioink with high shape integrity. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 3(3):
1815–1826.
11. Zhang J, Wu G, Qiu J, 2021, Interactions between cells and
biomaterials in tissue engineering: A review. Sheng Wu Gong https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c00169
Cheng Xue Bao, 37(8): 2668–2677. 23. Williams D, Thayer P, Martinez H, et al., 2018, A perspective
12. Hassan M, Dave K, Chandrawati R, et al., 2019, 3D printing on the physical, mechanical and biological specifications
of biopolymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering: of bioinks and the development of functional tissues in 3D
Nanomaterials, processing and structure-function relation. bioprinting. Bioprinting, 9: 19–36.
Eur Poly J, 121: 109340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2018.02.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109340 24. Garreta E, Oria R, Tarantino C, et al., 2017, Tissue
13. Aljohani W, Ullah MW, Zhang X, et al., 2018, Bioprinting engineering by decellularization and 3D bioprinting. Mater
and its applications in tissue engineering and regenerative Today, 20(4): 166–178.
medicine. Int J Biol Macromol, 107(Pt A): 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.171 25. Deo KA, Singh KA, Peak CW, et al., 2020, Bioprinting
14. Groll J, Burdick JA, Cho D W, et al., 2018, A definition 101: Design, fabrication, and evaluation of cell-laden 3D
of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. bioprinted scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A, 26(5–6): 318–338.
Biofabrication, 11(1): 013001. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2019.0298
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 26. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25th anniversary
15. Hospodiuk M, Dey M, Sosnoski D, et al., 2017, The bioink: A article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater,
comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol 25(36): 5011–5028.
Adv, 35(2): 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006
27. Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al., 2020, Progress in
16. Kabirian F, Mozafari M, 2020, Decellularized ECM-derived 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative
bioinks: Prospects for the future. Methods, 171: 108–118. engineering. Biomaterials, 226: 119536.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
17. Yue K, Trujillo-De Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al., 2015, 28. Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gardiner MD, et al., 2017,
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of 3D bioprinting for reconstructive surgery: Principles,
gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials, 73: applications and challenges. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,
254–271. 70(9): 1155–1170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.001

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 232 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759