Page 241 - IJB-9-5
P. 241
International Journal of Bioprinting Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting
29. Jentsch S, Nasehi R, Kuckelkorn C, et al., 2021, Multiscale 41. Ouyang L, Armstrong JPK, Lin Y, et al., 2020, Expanding and
3D bioprinting by nozzle-free acoustic droplet ejection. optimizing 3D bioprinting capabilities using complementary
Small Methods, 5(6): e2000971. network bioinks. Sci Adv, 6(38).
30. Adine C, Ng KK, Rungarunlert S, et al., 2018, Engineering 42. Kesti M, Muller M, Becher J, et al., 2015, A versatile bioink
innervated secretory epithelial organoids by magnetic three- for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based
dimensional bioprinting for stimulating epithelial growth in on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta
salivary glands. Biomaterials, 180: 52–66. Biomater, 11: 162–172.
31. Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, Gao N, et al., 2019, Printability of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033
pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate
bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 11(4): 43. Kim W, Kim G, 2019, Collagen/bioceramic-based composite
045006. bioink to fabricate a porous 3D hASCs-laden structure for
bone tissue regeneration. Biofabrication, 12(1): 015007.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab0631
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab436d
32. Pan W, Wallin TJ, Odent J, et al., 2019, Optical
stereolithography of antifouling zwitterionic hydrogels. 44. Alexander FA, Jr., Johnson L, Williams K, et al., 2019, A
J Mater Chem B, 7(17): 2855–2864. parameter study for 3D-printing organized nanofibrous
collagen scaffolds using direct-write electrospinning.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tb00278b Materials (Basel), 12(24): 4131.
33. You S, Li J, Zhu W, et al., 2018, Nanoscale 3D printing of https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244131
hydrogels for cellular tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B,
6(15): 2187–2197. 45. Axpe E, Oyen M, 2016, Applications of alginate-based
bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int J Mol Sci, 17(12): 1976.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB00301G
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17121976
34. Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY, et al., 2020, Digital light
processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage 46. Kyle S, Jessop ZM, Al-Sabah A, et al., 2017, ‘Printability’
tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 232: 119679. of candidate biomaterials for extrusion based 3D printing:
State-of-the-art. Adv Healthc Mater, 6(16).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700264
35. Ying GL, Jiang N, Maharjan S, et al., 2018, Aqueous two-
phase emulsion bioink-enabled 3D bioprinting of porous 47. Cattelan G, Guerrero Gerbolés A, Foresti R, et al., 2020,
hydrogels. Adv Mater, 30(50): e1805460. Alginate formulations: Current developments in the race
for hydrogel-based cardiac regeneration. Front Bioeng
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805460 Biotechnol, 8: 00414.
36. Heo DN, Castro NJ, Lee SJ, et al., 2017, Enhanced bone https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00414
tissue regeneration using a 3D printed microstructure
incorporated with a hybrid nano hydrogel. Nanoscale, 9(16): 48. Freeman FE, Kelly DJ, 2017, Tuning alginate bioink stiffness
5055–5062. and composition for controlled growth factor delivery
and to spatially direct MSC fate within bioprinted tissues.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr09652b Sci Rep, 7(1): 17042.
37. Miri AK, Nieto D, Iglesias L, et al., 2018, Microfluidics- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17286-1
enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic
bioprinting. Adv Mater, 30(27): e1800242. 49. Trachsel L, Johnbosco C, Lang T, et al., 2019, Double-
network hydrogels including enzymatically crosslinked
38. Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H, et al., 2019, Volumetric poly-(2-alkyl-2-oxazoline)s for 3D bioprinting of cartilage-
additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. engineering constructs. Biomacromolecules, 20(12):
Science, 363(6431): 1045–1079. 4502–4511.
39. Morris VB, Nimbalkar S, Younesi M, et al., 2017, Mechanical https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01266
properties, cytocompatibility and manufacturability of
chitosan:PEGDA hybrid-gel scaffolds by stereolithography. 50. Liu C, Qin W, Wang Y, et al., 2021, 3D printed gelatin/
Ann Biomed Eng, 45(1): 286–296. sodium alginate hydrogel scaffolds doped with nano-
attapulgite for bone tissue repair. Int J Nanomedicine, 16:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1643-1 8417–8432.
40. Shen Y, Tang H, Huang X, et al., 2020, DLP printing 51. Chen Q, Tian X, Fan J, et al., 2020, An interpenetrating
photocurable chitosan to build bio-constructs for tissue alginate/gelatin network for three-dimensional (3D) cell
engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 235: 115970. cultures and organ bioprinting. Molecules, 25(3): 756.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115970 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25030756
Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 233 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759

