Page 246 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

145. Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, et al., 2016, 157. Adams F, Qiu T, Mark A, et al., 2017, Soft 3D-printed
Bioprinting of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on phantom of the human kidney with collecting system. Ann
perfusable chips. Sci Rep, 6(1). Biomed Eng, 45(4): 963–972.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34845 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1757-5
146. Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting of urethra with 158. Albanna M, Binder KW, Murphy SA-O, et al., 2019, In
PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound
An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds. Sci
cell growth environment. Acta Biomater, 50: 154–164. Rep, 9(1): 1856.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.008 159. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, et al., 2019, 3D printing of
147. Ke D, Yi H, Est-Witte S, et al., 2019, Bioprinted trachea personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and
constructs with patient-matched design, mechanical and hearts. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6(11): 1900344.
biological properties. Biofabrication, 12(1): 015022. 160. Adams F, Qiu T, Mark A, et al., 2017, Soft 3D-printed
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5354 phantom of the human kidney with collecting system. Ann
Biomed Eng, 45(4): 963–972.
148. Ha D-H, Chae S, Lee JY, et al., 2021, Therapeutic effect
of decellularized extracellular matrix-based hydrogel for 161. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al., 2016, Research on the printability
radiation esophagitis by 3D printed esophageal stent. of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep, 6(1): 29977.
Biomaterials, 266: 120477. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29977
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120477 162. Datta P, Ayan B, Ozbolat IT, 2017, Bioprinting for vascular
149. Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J, et al., 2017, Direct 3D bioprinting and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater, 51:
of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex 1–20.
microarchitecture. Biomaterials, 124: 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.035
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042 163. Ouyang L, Yao R, Zhao Y, et al., 2016, Effect of bioink
properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting
150. Góra A, Pliszka D, Mukherjee S, et al., 2016, Tubular tissues
and organs of human body—challenges in regenerative of embryonic stem cells. Biofabrication, 8(3): 035020.
medicine. J Nanosci Nanotechnol, 16(1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020
https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2016.11604 164. Lee JM, Yeong WY, 2016, Design and printing strategies
151. Virk JS, Zhang H, Nouraei R, et al., 2017, Prosthetic in 3D bioprinting of cell-hydrogels: A review. Adv Healthc
reconstruction of the trachea: A historical perspective. Mater, 5(22): 2856–2865.
World J Clin Cases, 5(4): 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600435
https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v5.i4.128 165. Holzl K, Lin S, Tytgat L, et al., 2016, Bioink properties
before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8(3):
152. Lei D, Luo B, Guo Y, et al., 2019, 4-Axis printing microfibrous
tubular scaffold and tracheal cartilage application. Sci China 032002.
Mater, 62(12): 1910–1920. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-019-9498-5 166. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
153. Huo Y, Xu Y, Wu X, et al., 2022, Functional trachea organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32(8): 773–785.
reconstruction using 3D-bioprinted native-like tissue https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
architecture based on designable tissue-specific bioinks. Adv 167. Chimene D, Kaunas R, Gaharwar AK, 2020, Hydrogel
Sci (Weinh), 9(29): e2202181. bioink reinforcement for additive manufacturing: A focused
154. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al., 2017, Heart review of emerging strategies. Adv Mater, 32(1): e1902026.
disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: A report from https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902026
the American Heart Association. Circulation, 135(10):
168. Rana D, Ramasamy K, Leena M, et al., 2016, Surface
https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000485
functionalization of nanobiomaterials for application in
155. Noor N, Shapira A, Edri R, et al., 2019, 3D printing of stem cell culture, tissue engineering, and regenerative
personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and medicine. Biotechnol Prog, 32(3): 554–567.
hearts. Adv Sci, 6(11): 1900344.
https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.2262
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344
156. Shapira A, Noor N, Asulin M, et al., 2018, Stabilization
strategies in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting for tissue
engineering. Appl Phys Rev, 5(4): 041112.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055659
Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 238 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759