Page 242 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

52. Yang X, Lu Z, Wu H, et al., 2018, Collagen-alginate as bioink 63. Pati F, Jang J, Ha DH, et al., 2014, Printing three-dimensional
for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue tissue analogues with decellularized extracellular matrix
engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 83: 195–201. bioink. Nat Commun, 5: 3935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002 64. Choi YJ, Park HA-O, Ha DH, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting
53. Hong S, Sycks D, Chan HF, et al., 2015, 3D printing of highly of in vitro models using hydrogel-based bioinks. Polymers
stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized (Basel), 13(3): 366.
structures. Adv Mater, 27(27): 4035–4040. 65. Zhuang T, Li X, Deng Q, et al., 2020, A GelMA/DECM/
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501099 nanoclay composite biomaterial ink for printing 3D scaffolds
for primary hepatocytes cultivation. Mater Lett, 274: 128034.
54. Rg A, Lts A, Ab A, et al., 2022, Development and evaluation
of a multicomponent bioink consisting of alginate, gelatin, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128034
diethylaminoethyl cellulose and collagen peptide for 66. Khati V, Ramachandraiah H, Pati FA-O, et al., 2022,
3D bioprinting of tissue construct for drug screening 3D bioprinting of multi-material decellularized liver
application. Int J Biol Macromol, 207: 278–288. matrix hydrogel at physiological temperatures. Biosensors
55. Gritsch L, Motta FL, Contessi Negrini N, et al., 2018, (Basel),12(7): 521.
Crosslinked gelatin hydrogels as carriers for controlled 67. Veiga A, Silva IV, Duarte MA-O, et al., 2021, Current trends
heparin release. Mater Lett, 228: 375–378. on protein driven bioinks for 3D printing. Pharmaceutics,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.047 13(9): 1444.
56. Contessi Negrini N, Celikkin N, Tarsini P, et al., 2020, Three- 68. Shim JH, Kim JY, Park M, et al., 2011, Development of a hybrid
dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin scaffold with synthetic biomaterials and hydrogel using solid
hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering. Biofabrication, freeform fabrication technology. Biofabrication, 3(3): 034102.
12(2): 025001. 69. Casali DM, Yost MJ, Matthews MA, 2018, Eliminating
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab56f9 glutaraldehyde from crosslinked collagen films using
supercritical CO2. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 106(1): 86–94.
57. Yang G, Xiao Z, Long H, et al., 2018, Assessment of the
characteristics and biocompatibility of gelatin sponge scaffolds https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36209
prepared by various crosslinking methods. Sci Rep, 8(1): 1616. 70. Hwang Y-J, Larsen J, Krasieva TB, et al., 2011, Effect of
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20006-y genipin crosslinking on the optical spectral properties and
structures of collagen hydrogels. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,
58. Contessi Negrini N, Tarsini P, Tanzi MC, et al., 2018, 3(7): 2579–2584.
Chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels as scaffolding
materials for adipose tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci, https://doi.org/10.1021/am200416h
136(8): 47104. 71. Bax DV, Davidenko N, Gullberg D, et al., 2017, Fundamental
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47104 insight into the effect of carbodiimide crosslinking on
cellular recognition of collagen-based scaffolds. Acta
59. Chouhan D, Mandal BB, 2020, Silk biomaterials in wound Biomater, 49: 218–234.
healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to
bedside. Acta Biomater, 103: 24–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.059
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.050 72. Bax DV, Davidenko N, Hamaia SW, et al., 2019, Impact of
UV- and carbodiimide-based crosslinking on the integrin-
60. Xiong S, Zhang X, Lu P, et al., 2017, A gelatin-sulfonated binding properties of collagen-based materials. Acta
silk composite scaffold based on 3D printing technology Biomater, 100: 280–291.
enhances skin regeneration by stimulating epidermal
growth and dermal neovascularization. Sci Rep, 7(1): 4288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.046
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04149-y 73. Serna JA-O, Florez SA-O, Talero VA, et al., 2019, Formulation
and characterization of a SIS-based photocrosslinkable
61. Costa JB, Park J, Jorgensen AM, et al., 2020, 3D bioink. Polymers (Basel), 11(3): 569.
bioprinted highly elastic hybrid constructs for advanced
fibrocartilaginous tissue regeneration. Chem Mater, 32(19): 74. Madaghiele M, Calò E, Salvatore L, et al., 2016, Assessment
8733–8746. of collagen crosslinking and denaturation for the design of
regenerative scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 104(1):
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03556 186–194.
62. Castilho MA-O, Levato RA-O, Bernal PN, et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35554
Hydrogel-based bioinks for cell electrowriting of well-
organized living structures with micrometer-scale 75. Clark CC, Yoo KM, Sivakumar H, et al., 2022, Immersion
resolution. Biomacromolecules, 22(2): 855–866. bioprinting of hyaluronan and collagen bioink-supported

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 234 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759