Page 244 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting

98. Zheng X, Zhang X, Wang Y, et al., 2021, Hypoxia-mimicking 110. Nie C, Ma L, Li S, et al., 2019, Recent progresses in graphene
3D bioglass-nanoclay scaffolds promote endogenous bone based bio-functional nanostructures for advanced biological
regeneration. Bioact Mater, 6(10): 3485–3495. and cellular interfaces. Nano Today, 26: 57–97.
99. Ding Y, Liu X, Zhang J, et al., 2022, 3D printing polylactic https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.03.003
acid polymer-bioactive glass loaded with bone cement for 111. Jo H, Sim M, Kim S, et al., 2017, Electrically conductive
bone defect in weight-bearing area. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, graphene/polyacrylamide hydrogels produced by mild
10: 947521.
chemical reduction for enhanced myoblast growth and
100. Gao F, Xu Z, Liang Q, et al., 2019, Osteochondral differentiation. Acta Biomater, 48: 100–109.
regeneration with 3D-printed biodegradable high-strength https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.035
supramolecular polymer reinforced-gelatin hydrogel
scaffolds. Adv Sci (Weinh), 6(15): 1900867. 112. Park J, Choi JH, Kim S, et al., 2019, Micropatterned conductive
hydrogels as multifunctional muscle-mimicking biomaterials:
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900867 Graphene-incorporated hydrogels directly patterned with
101. Aihemaiti P, Jiang H, Aiyiti W, et al., Optimization of femtosecond laser ablation. Acta Biomater, 97: 141–153.
3D printing parameters of biodegradable polylactic acid/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.044
hydroxyapatite composite bone plates. Int J Bioprint,
8(1): 490. 113. Hu Y, Han W, Huang G, et al., 2016, Highly stretchable,
mechanically strong, tough, and self-recoverable nanocomposite
102. Ergul NM, Unal S, Kartal I, et al., 2019, 3D printing hydrogels by introducing strong ionic coordination interactions.
of chitosan/ poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel containing Macromol Chem Phys, 217(24): 2717–2725.
synthesized hydroxyapatite scaffolds for hard-tissue
engineering. Polymer Testing, 79: 106006. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201600398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106006 114. Li J, Liu X, Crook J M, et al., 2022, Development of 3D
printable graphene oxide based bio-ink for cell support and
103. Tomás H, Alves CS, Rodrigues J, 2018, Laponite®: A key tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 994776.
nanoplatform for biomedical applications? Nanomedicine,
14(7): 2407–2420. 115. Cheng Z, Landish B, Chi Z, et al., 2018, 3D printing hydrogel
with graphene oxide is functional in cartilage protection by
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2017.04.016 influencing the signal pathway of Rank/Rankl/OPG. Mater
104. Afewerki S, Magalhaes L, Silva A D R, et al., 2019, Bioprinting Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 82: 244–252.
a synthetic smectic clay for orthopedic applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.069
Adv Healthc Mater, 8(13): e1900158.
116. Choe G, Oh S, Seok JM, et al., 2019, Graphene oxide/
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201900158 alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional
105. Cheng Z, Landish B, Chi Z, et al., 2018, 3D printing hydrogel mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration
with graphene oxide is functional in cartilage protection by applications. Nanoscale, 11(48): 23275–23285.
influencing the signal pathway of Rank/Rankl/OPG. Mater https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr07643c
Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 82: 244–252.
117. Huang CT, Kumar Shrestha L, Ariga K, et al., 2017, A
106. Li L, Qin S, Peng J, et al., 2020, Engineering gelatin-based graphene-polyurethane composite hydrogel as a potential
alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D printing bioink for 3D bioprinting and differentiation of neural stem
of vessel constructs. Int J Biol Macromol, 145: 262–271. cells. J Mater Chem B, 5(44): 8854–8864.
107. Dasari Shareena TP, Mcshan D, Dasmahapatra AK, et https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tb01594a
al., 2018, A review on graphene-based nanomaterials in
biomedical applications and risks in environment and 118. Lee SJ, Zhu W, Nowicki M, et al., 2018, 3D printing nano
health. Nanomicro Lett, 10(3): 53. conductive multi-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds for
nerve regeneration. J Neural Eng, 15(1): 016018.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0206-4
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa95a5
108. Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL, et al., 2016, Graphene-based 119. Sanjuan-Alberte P, Whitehead C, Jones J N, et al., 2022,
materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 105(Pt Printing biohybrid materials for bioelectronic cardio-3D-
B): 255–274.
cellular constructs. iScience, 25(7): 104552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.007 120. Li L, Qin S, Peng J, et al., 2020, Engineering gelatin-based
109. Syama S, Mohanan PV, 2019, Comprehensive application of alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D
graphene: Emphasis on biomedical concerns. Nano-Micro printing of vessel constructs. Int J Biol Macromol, 145:
Lett, 11(1): 6. 262–271.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0237-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.174

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 236 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759