Page 157 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printed bioactive dressings for burn wound treatment

35. Jung S, 2013, Treatment of Chronic Wounds With Bioactive boron‐containing bioactive glass scaffolds. Int J Appl Glass
Borate Glass Fibers. An Introduction to Bioceramics, World Sci, 7(2): 206–215.
Scientific, Tuck Link, Singapore, 487–493.
50. Chai Q, Jiao Y, Yu X, 2017, Hydrogels for biomedical
36. Hu H, Tang Y, Pang L, et al., 2018, Angiogenesis and full- applications: Their characteristics and the mechanisms
thickness wound healing efficiency of a copper-doped behind them. Gels, 3(1): 6.
borate bioactive glass/poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) dressing 51. Fayyazbakhsh F, Amato M, Khayat MJ, et al., editors, 2022,
loaded with vitamin E in vivo and in vitro. ACS Appl Mater In-vivo evaluation of 3D printed hydrogel wound dressings
Interfaces, 10(27): 22939–22950.
for burn wound healing. Tissue Eng Part A, 28(S1):S527–S538.
37. Zhou J, Wang H, Zhao S, et al., 2016, In vivo and in vitro 52. Zhu Y, Ma Z, Kong L, et al., 2020, Modulation of macrophages
studies of borate based glass micro-fibers for dermal by bioactive glass/sodium alginate hydrogel is crucial in skin
repairing. Mater Sci Eng, C, 60: 437–445.
regeneration enhancement. Biomaterials, 256: 120216.
38. Ottomeyer M, Mohammadkah A, Day D, et al., 2016, Broad- 53. Manning JH, Stark JH, 1977, Diester crosslinked polyglucan
spectrum antibacterial characteristics of four novel borate- hydrogels and reticulated sponges thereof. Google Patents.
based bioactive glasses. Adv Microbiol, 6(10): 776–787.
54. Kamoun EA, Kenawy E-RS, Chen X, 2017, A review
39. Thyparambil NJ, Gutgesell LC, Bromet BA, et al., 2020, on polymeric hydrogel membranes for wound dressing
Bioactive borate glass triggers phenotypic changes in applications: PVA-based hydrogel dressings. J Adv Res, 8(3):
adipose stem cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 31(4): 1–15.
217–233.
40. Mouriño V, Vidotto R, Cattalini J, et al., 2019, Enhancing 55. Li J, Mooney DJ, 2016, Designing hydrogels for controlled
biological activity of bioactive glass scaffolds by inorganic drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater, 1(12): 1–17.
ion delivery for bone tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biomed
Eng, 10: 23–34. 56. Bruggeman KF, Williams RJ, Nisbet DR, 2018, Dynamic
and responsive growth factor delivery from electrospun and
41. Ramos Rivera C, 2020, Development of HIF-Mimicking hydrogel tissue engineering materials. Adv Healthc Mater,
Materials for Chronic Wound Healing, University College 7(1): 1700836.
London, London, United Kingdom.
57. Zhu J, Jiang G, Song G, et al., 2019, Incorporation of
42. Schuhladen K, Stich L, Schmidt J, et al., 2020, Cu, Zn doped ZnO/bioactive glass nanoparticles into alginate/chitosan
borate bioactive glasses: Antibacterial efficacy and dose- composite hydrogels for wound closure. ACS Appl Biol
dependent in vitro modulation of murine dendritic cells. Mater, 2(11): 5042–5052.
Biomater Sci, 8(8): 2143–2155.
58. Mehrabi A, Karimi A, Mashayekhan S, et al., 2022, In-
43. Chebassier N, Ouijja EH, Viegas I, et al., 2004, Stimulatory situ forming hydrogel based on thiolated chitosan/
effect of boron and manganese salts on keratinocyte carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) containing borate
migration. Acta Dermatovenereol, 84(3): 191–194.
bioactive glass for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol, 222:
44. Ege D, Zheng K, Boccaccini AR, 2022, Borate bioactive 620–635.
glasses (BBG): Bone regeneration, wound healing 59. Yang Z, Ren X, Liu Y, 2021, Multifunctional 3D printed porous
applications, and future directions. ACS Appl Biol Mater, GelMA/xanthan gum based dressing with biofilm control and
5(8): 3608–3622.
wound healing activity. Mater Sci Eng C, 131: 112493.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00384
60. Pirayavaraporn C, Rades T, Tucker IG, 2012, Determination
45. Salvo J, Sandoval C, 2022, Role of copper nanoparticles in of moisture content in relation to thermal behaviour and
wound healing for chronic wounds: Literature review. Burns plasticization of Eudragit RLPO. Int J Pharmaceut, 422(1-2):
Trauma, 10: tkab047 (1–9). 68–74.
46. Mutlu N, Kurtuldu F, Unalan I, et al., 2022, Effect of Zn and 61. Martineau L, Shek PN, 2006, Evaluation of a bi-layer wound
Ga doping on bioactivity, degradation, and antibacterial dressing for burn care: I. Cooling and wound healing
properties of borate 1393-B3 bioactive glass. Ceram Int, properties. Burns, 32(1): 70–76.
48(11): 16404–16417.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.08.009.
47. Kermani F, Nazarnezhad S, Mollaei Z, et al., 2023, Zinc- 62. Rice P, Orgill DP, 2008, Emergency care of moderate and
and copper-doped mesoporous borate bioactive glasses: severe thermal burns in adults. UpToDate, Wolters Kluwer
Promising additives for potential use in skin wound healing Marx JA, Grayzel J, eds.
applications. Int J Mol Sci, 24(2): 1304.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/emergency-care-of-
48. Lin P-H, Sermersheim M, Li H, et al., 2017, Zinc in wound moderate-and-severe-thermal-burns-in-adults
healing modulation. Nutrients, 10(1): 16.
63. Schaefer TJ, Lopez ON, 2020, Burn resuscitation and
49. Balasubramanian P, Grünewald A, Detsch R, et al., 2016, management. StatPearls [Internet].
Ion release, hydroxyapatite conversion, and cytotoxicity of

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 149 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0118