Page 277 - IJB-9-6
P. 277

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     3D bioprinting for vascular system




            vascular grafts. Along with further  improvement  of   https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac0963
            existing biomaterials and molding processes, bioreactors   2.   Nienaber  C, Clough R, Sakalihasan N, 2016, Aortic
            can effectively promote the maturation of printed blood   dissection. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2: 16053-16070.
            vessel, and fabrication of blood vessel grafts as well as thick,   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.53
            vascularized tissues and organs with complete biological
            functions will become possible.                    3.   Devillard CD, Marquette CA, 2021, Vascular tissue
                                                                  engineering: Challenges and requirements for an ideal large
            Acknowledgments                                       scale blood vessel. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9(October): 1–21.
            We are very grateful to Professor Wen Zeng for her careful   https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.721843
            guidance.                                          4.   Stout KK, Otto CM, 2007, Indications for aortic valve
                                                                  replacement in aortic stenosis. J Intens Care Med, 22(1): 14–25.
            Funding                                               https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066606295298

            This work was supported by the National Key Research   5.   Maselli D, Minzioni G, 2006, A technique to reposition
            and Development Plan Young Scientists Program (No.    sinotubular junction in aortic valve reimplantation
            2021YFA1102100), the National Defense Fund for        procedures with the  de Paulis Valsalva graft.  Eur J
            Outstanding Scholars (No. 2021‐JCJQ‐Z0‐003), the      Cardiothorac Surg, 29(1): 107–109.
            Chongqing Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.028
            (No. cstc2020jcyj‐jqX0023), and the Chongqing University   6.   Kehl D, Weber B, Hoerstrup SP, 2016, Bioengineered living
            Innovation Research Group Project (No. CXQT21010).    cardiac and venous valve replacements: Current status and
            Figures were made with Adobe Illustrator 2021.        future prospects. Cardiovasc Pathol, 25(4): 300–305.

            Conflict of interest                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2016.03.001
                                                               7.   Mallis P, Kostakis A, Stavropoulos-giokas C, 2020, Future
            The authors declare no conflict of interest.          perspectives in small-diameter vascular graft engineering.
                                                                  Bioengineering, 7(4): 1–40.
            Author contributions:
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7040160
            Conceptualization: Wen Zeng                        8.   Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Butler PE, et al., 2005, Current
            Funding acquisition: Wen Zeng                         status of prosthetic bypass grafts: A review. J Biomed Mater
            Project administration: Wen Zeng                      Res - Part B Appl Biomater, 74(1): 570–581.
            Supervision: Wen Zeng
            Visualization: Junpeng Zhu                            https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30247
            Writing – original draft: Junpeng Zhu, Xinwang Wang, Lin Lin  9.   Gemelli M, Gallo M, Addonizio M, 2023, Venous external
            Writing – review & editing: Junpeng Zhu, Xinwang Wang,   support in coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic
               Lin Lin                                            review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol, 101687.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101687
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         10.  Pashneh-Tala S, MacNeil S, Claeyssens F, 2016, The tissue-

            Not applicable.                                       engineered vascular graft - Past, present, and future. Tissue
                                                                  Eng - Part B: Rev, 22(1): 68–100.
            Consent for publication                               https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0100

            Not applicable.                                    11.  Weekes A, Bartnikowski N, Pinto N, et al., Biofabrication
                                                                  of small diameter tissue-engineered vascular grafts.  Acta
            Availability of data                                  Biomater, 138(15): 92–111.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.012
            Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new
            data were created or analyzed in this study.       12.  Barrs RW, Jia J, Silver SE,  et al., 2020, Biomaterials for
                                                                  bioprinting microvasculature.  Chem Rev, 120(19): 10887–
            References                                            10949.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00027
            1.   Fazal F, Raghav S, Callanan A,  et al., 2021, Recent   13.  Li X, Liu L, Zhang X, et al., 2018, Research and development
               advancements in the bioprinting of vascular grafts.   of 3D printed vasculature constructs.  Biofabrication,
               Biofabrication, 13(032003): 032003–032021.         10(032002): 032002–032014.



            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        269                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0012
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282