Page 279 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting for vascular system

36. Fazal F, Diaz Sanchez FJ, Waqas M, et al., 2021, A modified https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00947
3D printer as a hybrid bioprinting-electrospinning system 47. Yu H, Gong W, Mei J, 2022, The efficacy of a paeoniflorin-
for use in vascular tissue engineering applications. Med Eng sodium alginate-gelatin skin scaffold for the treatment of
Phys, 94: 52–60.
diabetic wound: An in vivo study in a rat model. Biomed
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.06.005 Pharmacotherap, 151: 113165-113171.
37. Jin Q, Fu Y, Zhang G, 2022, Nanofiber electrospinning https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113165
combined with rotary bioprinting for fabricating small- 48. Cheng F, Cao X, Li H, 2019, Generation of cost-effective
diameter vessels with endothelium and smooth muscle. paper-based tissue models through matrix-assisted
Compos B Eng, 234(1): 109691-109700.
sacrificial 3D printing. Nano Lett, 19(6): 3603–3611.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109691
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00583
38. Größbacher G, Bartolf-Kopp M, Gergely C, 2023, Volumetric
printing across melt electrowritten scaffolds fabricates 49. Zheng J, Liu Y, Hou C, 2022, Ovary-derived decellularized
multi‐material living constructs with tunable architecture extracellular matrix-based bioink for fabricating 3D primary
and mechanics. Adv Mater, 2300756–2300773. ovarian cells-laden structures for mouse ovarian failure
correction. Int J Bioprint, 8(3): 269–282.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202300756
https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.V8I3.597
39. Cao P, Tao L, Gong J, 2021, 4D printing of a sodium alginate
hydrogel with step-wise shape deformation based on 50. Oliveira H, Medina C, Labrunie G, 2022, Cell-assembled
variation of crosslinking density. ACS Appl Polym Mater, extracellular matrix (CAM): A human biopaper for the
3(12): 6167–6175. biofabrication of pre-vascularized tissues able to connect
to the host circulation in vivo. Biofabrication, 14(1):
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.1c01034 015005-015019.
40. Kitana W, Apsite I, Hazur J, et al., 2023, 4D biofabrication https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac2f81
of t-shaped vascular bifurcation. Adv Mater Technol, 8(1):
2200429-2200439. 51. Li S, Wang W, Li W, 2021, Fabrication of thermoresponsive
hydrogel scaffolds with engineered microscale vasculatures.
https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200429 Adv Funct Mater, 31(27): 2102685-2102699.
41. Kirillova A, Maxson R, Stoychev G, et al., 2017, 4D https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102685
biofabrication using shape-morphing hydrogels. Adv Mater,
29(46): 1703443-1703450. 52. Thomas A, Orellano I, Lam T, 2020, Vascular bioprinting
with enzymatically degradable bioinks via multi-material
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703443
projection-based stereolithography. Acta Biomater, 117:
42. Wu Z, Cai H, Ao Z, et al., 2021, Microfluidic printing of 121–132.
tunable hollow microfibers for vascular tissue engineering.
Adv Mater Technol, 6(8): 2000683-2000691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.033
https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202000683 53. Zeng X, Meng Z, He J, 2022, Embedded bioprinting for
designer 3D tissue constructs with complex structural
43. Muthusamy S, Kannan S, Lee M, 2021, 3D bioprinting and organization. Acta Biomater, 140: 1–22.
microscale organization of vascularized tissue constructs using
collagen-based bioink. Biotechnol Bioeng, 118(8): 3150–3163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.048
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27838 54. Zhang S, Qi C, Zhang W, 2022, In‐situ endothelialization of
freeform 3D network of interconnected tubular channels via
44. Cidonio G, Glinka M, Kim Y, 2020, Nanoclay-based interfacial coacervation by aqueous‐in‐aqueous embedded
3D printed scaffolds promote vascular ingrowth ex vivo bioprinting. Adv Mater, 35(7): 2209263–2209269.
and generate bone mineral tissue in vitro and in vivo.
Biofabrication, 12(3): 035010-035025. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209263
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab8753 55. Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko R, 2015, Three-dimensional
printing of complex biological structures by freeform
45. Liu C, Campbell S, Li J, 2022, High throughput reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv,
omnidirectional printing of tubular microstructures from 1(9): e1500758-e1500767.
elastomeric polymers. Adv Healthc Mater, 11(23): 2201346–
2201359. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201346 56. Lee A, Hudson A, Shiwarski D, 2019, 3D bioprinting
of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart.
46. Barrs RW, Jia J, Ward M, 2021, Engineering a chemically
defined hydrogel bioink for direct bioprinting of 365(6452): 482–487.
microvasculature. Biomacromolecules, 22(2): 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav9051

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 271 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0012