Page 63 - IJB-9-6
P. 63

International Journal of Bioprinting                           Sub-regional design of the bionic bone scaffolds



               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.094    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.114602
            24.  Li H, Luo Z, Gao L, et al., 2018, Topology optimization   35.  Zhu L, Liang H, Lv F, et al., 2021, Design and compressive
               for concurrent design of structures with multi-patch   fatigue properties of irregular porous scaffolds for
               microstructures by level sets. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng,   orthopedics fabricated using selective laser melting,  ACS
               331:536–561.                                       Biomater Sci Eng, 7:1663–1672.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.033          https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01392
            25.  Terriault P, Brailovski V, 2018, Modeling and simulation of   36.  Liang H, Yang Y, Xie D, et al., 2019, Trabecular-like Ti-6Al-
               large,  conformal,  porosity-graded  and  lightweight  lattice   4V scaffolds for orthopedic: fabrication by selective laser
               structures made by additive manufacturing.  Finite Elem   melting and in vitro biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Technol,
               Anal Des, 138:1–11.                                35:1284–1297.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.09.005        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2019.01.012
            26.  Radman A, Huang X, Xie YM, 2012, Topology optimization   37.  Li  Y,  2014,  Deformable Geometry Design with Controlled
               of functionally graded cellular materials.  J Mater Sci,   Mechanical Property Based on 3D Printing,  University  of
               48:1503–1510.                                      Southern California, 162.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6905-1       38.  Radman A, 2021, Combination of BESO and harmony
                                                                  search for topology optimization of microstructures for
            27.  Alzahrani M, Choi SK, Rosen DW, 2015, Design of truss-like
               cellular structures using relative density mapping method.   materials. Appl Math Model, 90:650–661.
               Mater Des, 85:349–360.                             https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.09.024
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.180    39.  Hutmacher DW, 2000, Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone
                                                                  and cartilage. Biomaterials, 21:2529–2543.
            28.  Zhao F, 2018, Variable density cellular structure design
               method base on local relative density mapping.  J Mech   https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6
               Eng, 54:121–8.
                                                               40.  Yan QY, Cheng Y, Wang RR, et al., 2022, Recent advances in
               https://doi.org/10.3901/jme.2018.19.121            3D porous MXenes: Structures, properties and applications.
                                                                  J Phys D-Appl Phys, 55:15.
            29.  Wang C, Gu X, Zhu J,  et  al., 2020, Concurrent design
               of  hierarchical  structures  with  three-dimensional  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac2db2
               parameterized  lattice  microstructures  for  additive  41.  Prananingrum W, Naito Y, Galli S, et al., 2016, Bone
               manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip O, 61:869–894.
                                                                  ingrowth of various porous titanium scaffolds produced by
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02408-2         a moldless and space holder technique: an in vivo study in
                                                                  rabbits. Biomed Mater, 11:8.
            30.  Xia L, Xia Q, Huang XD,  et  al., 2018, Bi-directional
               evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures   https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/11/1/015012
               and materials: A comprehensive review.  Arch Comput   42.  Babaie E, Bhaduri SB, 2018, Fabrication aspects of porous
               Method Eng, 25:437–478.
                                                                  biomaterials in orthopedic applications: A review,  ACS
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9203-2          Biomater Sci Eng, 4:1–39.
            31.  Lee TU, Xie YM, 2022, Optimizing load locations and   https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00615
               directions in structural design. Finite Elem Anal Des, 209:8.
                                                               43.  Zheng YH, Han Q, Wang JC, et al., 2020, Promotion of
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2022.103811        osseointegration between implant and bone interface by
                                                                  titanium alloy porous scaffolds prepared by 3D printing.
            32  Bi MH, Tran P, Xia LW, et al., 2022, Topology optimization
               for 3D concrete printing with various manufacturing   ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 6:5181–5190.
               constraints. Addit Manuf, 57:15.                   https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00662
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102982     44.  Zhang S, 2016, Foam metal research and application
                                                                  progress. Powder Metall Technol, 34:222–227.
            33.  Han YS, Xu B, Duan ZY, et al., 2022, Stress-based topology
               optimization of continuum structures for the elastic contact   45.  Qiu SW, Zhang XN, Hao QX, et al., 2015, Research progress
               problems with friction. Struct Multidiscip O, 65:22.  on simulation modeling of metal foams.  Rare Metal Mat
                                                                  Eng, 44:2670–2676.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03169-1
                                                               46.  Gibson LJ, 2003, Cellular solids. MRS Bull, 28:270–271.
            34.  Han YS, Xu B, Duan ZY, et al., 2022, Stress-based multi-
               material structural topology optimization considering   https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2003.79
               graded interfaces. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng, 391:31.



            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                         55                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0222
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68