Page 62 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Sub-regional design of the bionic bone scaffolds

2. Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, et al., 2009, Ti Voronoi-tessellation and for additive manufacturing. ACS
based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic Biomater Sci Eng, 4:719–727.
implants—A review. Prog Mater Sci, 54:397–425.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00916
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004
13. Du Y, Liang H, Xie D, et al., 2020, Design and statistical
3. Choi K, Kuhn JL, Ciarelli MJ, et al., 1990, The elastic-moduli analysis of irregular porous scaffolds for orthopedic
of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone reconstruction based on Voronoi tessellation and fabricated
tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J via selective laser melting (SLM). Mater Chem Phys,
Biomech, 23:1103–1113. 239:121968.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90003-l https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121968
4. Melancon D, Bagheri ZS, Johnston RB, et al., 2017, 14. Van Bael S, Chai YC, Truscello S, et al., 2012, The effect of
Mechanical characterization of structurally porous pore geometry on the in vitro biological behavior of human
biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, periosteum-derived cells seeded on selective laser-melted
predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone Ti6Al4V bone scaffolds. Acta Biomater, 8:2824–2834.
replacement implants. Acta Biomater, 63:350–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.013 15. Gongyi H, 2007, Characteristics of osteoporosis-related
5. Kantaros A, Chatzidai N, Karalekas D, 2016, 3D printing- fracture and clinical study. Basic Clin Med, 27:1088–1092.
assisted design of scaffold structures. Int J Adv Manuf 16. Barbaros I, Yang YM, Safaei B, et al., 2022, State-of-the-art
Technol, 82:559–571. review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7386-6 of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials.
Nanotechnol Rev, 11:321–371.
6. Tshephe TS, Akinwamide SO, Olevsky E, et al., 2022,
Additive manufacturing of titanium-based alloys—A review https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0017
of methods, properties, challenges, and prospects. Heliyon, 17. Liu B, Chen H, Cao W, 2019, A novel method for tailoring
8:20. elasticity distributions of functionally graded porous
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09041 materials. Int J Mech Sci, 157–158:457–470.
7. Zhao D, Huang Y, Ao Y, et al., 2018, Effect of pore geometry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.002
on the fatigue properties and cell affinity of porous titanium 18. George SM, Nayak C, Singh I, et al., 2022, Multifunctional
scaffolds fabricated by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav hydroxyapatite composites for orthopedic applications: A
Biomed Mater, 88:478–487. review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 8:3162–3186.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.048 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00140
8. Yan X, Li Q, Yin S, et al., 2019, Mechanical and in vitro study 19. Deering J, Dowling KI, DiCecco LA, et al., 2021, Selective
of an isotropic Ti6Al4V lattice structure fabricated using Voronoi tessellation as a method to design anisotropic
selective laser melting, J Alloy Compd, 782:209–223. and biomimetic implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.220 116:104361.
9. Gomez S, Vlad MD, Lopez J, et al., 2016, Design and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104361
properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Acta 20. Liu B, Cao W, Zhang L, et al., 2021, A design method of
Biomater, 42:341–350. Voronoi porous structures with graded relative elasticity
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 distribution for functionally gradient porous materials. Int
J Mech Mater Des, 17:863–883.
10. Rumpler M, Woesz A, Dunlop JWC, et al., 2008, The effect
of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth, J R Soc https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-021-09558-6
Interface, 5:1173–1180. 21. Davoodi E, Montazerian H, Mirhakimi AS, et al., 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0064 Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials, Bioact
Mater, 15:214–249.
11. Biemond JE, Aquarius R, Verdonschot N, et al., 2011,
Frictional and bone ingrowth properties of engineered https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.027
surface topographies produced by electron beam technology. 22. Zhou J, Xia L, Huang K, 2022, Design-oriented topology
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 131:711–718. optimization of structures. J Ship Mech, 26:538–546.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1218-9 23. Xu FX, Zhang X, Zhang H, 2018, A review on functionally
12. Wang G, Shen L, Zhao J, et al., 2018, Design and compressive graded structures and materials for energy absorption. Eng
behavior of controllable irregular porous scaffolds: Based on Struct, 171:309–325.

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 54 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0222